Periodization and Sovereignty How Ideas of Feudalism and Secularization Govern the Politics of Time Kathleen Davis "Everyone should read this book. There are at least two reasons I think so. The first is the sheer intellectual pleasure ot be had in grappling with its challenging and complex argument. The second is the exciting way the book models the kind of comparative, cross-field, interdisciplinary projects that everyone values but that few of us are trained to do. "--Criticism "Kathleen Davis, a skilled scholar of Anglo-Saxon and medieval English literature, and a courageously committed dialogist of medieval and postcolonial studies, has crafted a critical analysis of the political-theology of periodization. Her study is as dynamically precise as the structure of a protein. Composed in two parts, it intentionally folds in on itself in order to mark performatively the double bind of periodization--a mimesis of temporality and a Western juridical concept of sovereignty. Her aim is to explicate how the time of periodization is the time of sovereignty, or, put another way, sovereignty is a mode of temporality." --TMR Despite all recent challenges to stage-oriented histories, the idea of a division between a "medieval" and a "modern" period has survived, even flourished, in academia. Periodization and Sovereignty demonstrates that this survival is no innocent affair. By examining periodization together with the two controversial categories of feudalism and secularization, Kathleen Davis exposes the relationship between the constitution of "the Middle Ages" and the history of sovereignty, slavery, and colonialism. This book's groundbreaking investigation of feudal historiography finds that the historical formation of "feudalism" mediated the theorization of sovereignty and a social contract, even as it provided a rationale for colonialism and facilitated the disavowal of slavery. Sovereignty is also at the heart of today's often violent struggles over secular and religious politics, and Davis traces the relationship between these struggles and the narrative of "secularization," which grounds itself in a period divide between a "modern" historical consciousness and a theologically entrapped "Middle Ages" incapable of history. This alignment of sovereignty, the secular, and the conceptualization of historical time, which relies essentially upon a medieval/modern divide, both underlies and regulates today's volatile debates over world politics. The problem of defining the limits of our most fundamental political concepts cannot be extricated, Davis argues, from the periodizing operations that constituted them, and that continue today to obscure the process by which "feudalism" and "secularization" govern the politics of time. Kathleen Davisis the author of Deconstruction and Translation. She has taught in the Department of English at Princeton University and is currently on the faculty of the University of Rhode Island. The Middle Ages Series 2008 | 200 pages | 6 x 9 ISBN 978-0-8122-4083-2 | Cloth | $49.95s | GBP32.50 World Rights | History Short copy: By examining periodization together with the two controversial categories of feudalism and secularization, Kathleen Davis exposes the relationship between the constitution of "the Middle Ages" and the history of sovereignty, slavery, and colonialism.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的语言风格非常独特,它混合了一种十九世纪古典主义的庄重和当代后结构主义的解构倾向。初读时,我有些许不适应,因为它很少使用当代流行的那种快节奏、碎片化的表达,而是偏爱使用冗长但结构严谨的长句,每一个从句都像是为前面的主句做了最恰当的注脚。这种写作方式要求读者必须保持高度的专注,一旦走神,就很容易迷失在复杂的语法结构中。但一旦适应了这种节奏,就会发现其强大的内在逻辑美感。作者在处理复杂概念时,习惯性地引入大量的隐喻和典故,这些比喻不仅服务于说明,本身也构成了文本意义的重要组成部分。比如他对“界限的消融”的描述,用了‘湿润的沙滩上的潮汐线’这一意象,瞬间将一个抽象的政治哲学概念具象化了,那种画面感和震撼力,是直白的论述所无法企及的。
评分这本书的装帧设计本身就带有一种古典的厚重感,拿到手里沉甸甸的,封面的排版很简洁,但字体选择和墨色的搭配却透露出一种不容置疑的权威性。我一翻开序言,就被作者那种娓娓道来却又字字珠玑的叙事方式所吸引。他似乎总能找到一个恰到好处的切入点,将一个宏大而抽象的概念,通过一系列看似毫不相干的历史碎片巧妙地串联起来。比如,他谈到古代祭祀仪式的空间布局如何预示着后世的政治权力结构,那种论证的严谨性和跨学科的视野,实在令人叹服。我特别喜欢他处理时间维度的方式,不是简单地线性叙事,而是像一个技艺高超的织工,将不同时代的经纬线交织在一起,织出意义的图案。读完第一章,我感觉自己像是站在一个高耸的瞭望塔上,对整个历史的脉络有了一种全新的、俯瞰式的理解。这本书的文字密度很高,需要反复咀嚼,但每一次重读,都会发现新的层次感,就像在解读一幅精美的巴洛克壁画,细节丰富到让人目眩神迷。
评分作为一名对历史变迁抱有浓厚兴趣的普通读者,我发现这本书最大的挑战性在于其对“时间观”的重塑。作者似乎并不接受我们日常生活中那种线性的、不可逆的时间概念,而是倾向于展示时间如何以循环、嵌套、甚至断裂的方式存在于人类的集体记忆和社会结构之中。书中对一些关键历史转折点的分析,完全颠覆了我原有的认知框架。例如,他对某个特定王朝中“朝会”仪式的详细描摹,与其说是记录历史事件,不如说是在重建一种被遗忘的“时间体验”。这种体验是仪式化的、周期性的,与现代社会所追求的效率和进步观形成了鲜明的张力。阅读过程中,我常常需要停下来,进行深度的自我反思,思考我们当前所处的“时刻”是如何被过去的“时刻”所塑造和限定的。这本书不是提供答案的,它更像是一把精密的钥匙,打开了理解世界复杂性的全新视角。
评分这本书的学术功底毋庸置疑,但更令人惊喜的是其叙事上的“戏剧性”。作者似乎深谙如何通过人物的侧面描写和对关键行动的聚焦来推动论点。他笔下的人物,无论是古代的统治者还是早期的思想家,都不是扁平的符号,而是充满了内在矛盾和挣扎的个体。这种对个体经验的关注,巧妙地平衡了宏大理论的抽象性,使得理论的阐释变得有血有肉。我尤其欣赏作者在总结陈词时所展现出的那种克制的情感张力——他不会直接下定论,而是将所有论证的重量都放在了前文的铺陈之上,让结论如同重磅炸弹般,在读者心中炸开。读完最后一页,我合上书本,一种强烈的知识满足感和对现实世界运作机制更深层次的理解油然而生,这绝对是一部值得反复研读的重量级作品。
评分这本书的行文节奏把握得极其精妙,简直就像一部精心编排的交响乐。开头部分,作者用一种近乎诗意的散文笔调,勾勒出一种关于“秩序”与“边界”的哲学冥想,那语言的流动性极佳,读起来非常顺畅,仿佛被一种无形的力量牵引着向前。然而,一旦进入到具体案例的分析,笔锋立刻变得如同手术刀般精准和犀利。他不会沉溺于繁琐的史料堆砌,而是像一个高明的辩论家,总能在关键的历史节点抛出一个挑战性的疑问,然后用极具穿透力的逻辑链条予以解答。我注意到他经常使用对比和反讽的手法来凸显论点的张力,比如将某一特定时期的法律条文与同时代的民间谚语并置,这种“高雅”与“世俗”的碰撞,极大地丰富了文本的内涵。我个人认为,这本书最大的魅力在于其内在的张力——它既有学者的严谨,又不失思想家的浪漫想象力。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有