圖書標籤: Habermas  批判方法  sphere  public.sphere  public  society  politics  habermas   

喜歡 The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere 的讀者還喜歡

好想找一找探討祁剋果和哈貝馬斯對公共領域不同考慮的文章，now that the modern public sphere is radically different from the ancient polis or republic, understanding itself as being outside political power, should we deem mediated public sphere a site of elitist communicative ideal or a dangerous producer of nihilism and detached reflection?

好想找一找探討祁剋果和哈貝馬斯對公共領域不同考慮的文章，now that the modern public sphere is radically different from the ancient polis or republic, understanding itself as being outside political power, should we deem mediated public sphere a site of elitist communicative ideal or a dangerous producer of nihilism and detached reflection?

好想找一找探討祁剋果和哈貝馬斯對公共領域不同考慮的文章，now that the modern public sphere is radically different from the ancient polis or republic, understanding itself as being outside political power, should we deem mediated public sphere a site of elitist communicative ideal or a dangerous producer of nihilism and detached reflection?

Brilliant!

好想找一找探討祁剋果和哈貝馬斯對公共領域不同考慮的文章，now that the modern public sphere is radically different from the ancient polis or republic, understanding itself as being outside political power, should we deem mediated public sphere a site of elitist communicative ideal or a dangerous producer of nihilism and detached reflection?

本文试图从哈贝马斯所述的，资产阶级公共领域自诞生至消亡的发展过程中，捉出贯穿全程的两条线索，即自由主义“需要统治”和“寻求消灭统治”之间的冲突，以及资产阶级公共领域“普遍开放原则”与其对“理性”的需要之间的矛盾。这两个问题对于典型的资产阶级公共领域来说，既...  

以资本主义由自由主义阶段向国家干预阶段发展为背景，哈贝马斯的《公共领域的结构转型》一书重点探讨了资本主义公共领域的产生、发展到、变化的动态过程。它是一本半理论，半实证的著作。不幸的是，其晦涩难度并不亚于其纯理论的著作。 但读完这本书后，当我们在回到理论上，...

我认为哈贝马斯对于公共领域理论的探讨对研究舆论问题、民主等问题有非常重要的借鉴意义，但是不得不承认从这本书中我仍然能感受到一些局限性。哈贝马斯将公共领域化为四个发展阶段其中不乏理想主义的色彩，将公共权力的合法性仅限于由公共领域发展起来的市民社会的意见，同时...