In this major theoretical and methodological statement on the history of religions, Jonathan Z. Smith shows how convert apologetic agendas can dictate the course of comparative religious studies. As his example, Smith reviews four centuries of scholarship comparing early Christianities with religions of late Antiquity (especially the so-called mystery cults) and shows how this scholarship has been based upon an underlying Protestant-Catholic polemic. The result is a devastating critique of traditional New Testament scholarship, a redescription of early Christianities as religious traditions amenable to comparison, and a milestone in Smith's controversial approach to comparative religious studies. "An important book, and certainly one of the most significant in the career of Jonathan Z. Smith, whom one may venture to call the greatest pathologist in the history of religions. As in many precedent cases, Smith follows a standard procedure: he carefully selects his victim, and then dissects with artistic finesse and unequaled acumen. The operation is always necessary, and a deconstructor of Smith's caliber is hard to find."--Ioan P. Coulianu, "Journal of Religion "
具体描述
读后感
很推荐这本书，算是让我重新找到自己进入圣经研究的动力。虽然并非认同史密斯所引用的新约研究的成果，但是想必看完这本书的人，视野会开阔很多，而且也提醒自己，做比较研究的，心要放宽。 另外值得注意的是，在SBL和AAR回应史密斯的学者，基本上都是被正统基督教视为大敌的...
评分很推荐这本书，算是让我重新找到自己进入圣经研究的动力。虽然并非认同史密斯所引用的新约研究的成果，但是想必看完这本书的人，视野会开阔很多，而且也提醒自己，做比较研究的，心要放宽。 另外值得注意的是，在SBL和AAR回应史密斯的学者，基本上都是被正统基督教视为大敌的...
评分很推荐这本书，算是让我重新找到自己进入圣经研究的动力。虽然并非认同史密斯所引用的新约研究的成果，但是想必看完这本书的人，视野会开阔很多，而且也提醒自己，做比较研究的，心要放宽。 另外值得注意的是，在SBL和AAR回应史密斯的学者，基本上都是被正统基督教视为大敌的...
评分很推荐这本书，算是让我重新找到自己进入圣经研究的动力。虽然并非认同史密斯所引用的新约研究的成果，但是想必看完这本书的人，视野会开阔很多，而且也提醒自己，做比较研究的，心要放宽。 另外值得注意的是，在SBL和AAR回应史密斯的学者，基本上都是被正统基督教视为大敌的...
评分很推荐这本书，算是让我重新找到自己进入圣经研究的动力。虽然并非认同史密斯所引用的新约研究的成果，但是想必看完这本书的人，视野会开阔很多，而且也提醒自己，做比较研究的，心要放宽。 另外值得注意的是，在SBL和AAR回应史密斯的学者，基本上都是被正统基督教视为大敌的...
用户评价
How should we go about the comparative approach? Why were certain paths chosen and certain stories told, whereas others forsaken? What are some of the deeply seated prejudices behind widely recognized, and apparently convincing, narratives? Smith's work is methodologically instructive.
评分How should we go about the comparative approach? Why were certain paths chosen and certain stories told, whereas others forsaken? What are some of the deeply seated prejudices behind widely recognized, and apparently convincing, narratives? Smith's work is methodologically instructive.
评分How should we go about the comparative approach? Why were certain paths chosen and certain stories told, whereas others forsaken? What are some of the deeply seated prejudices behind widely recognized, and apparently convincing, narratives? Smith's work is methodologically instructive.
评分How should we go about the comparative approach? Why were certain paths chosen and certain stories told, whereas others forsaken? What are some of the deeply seated prejudices behind widely recognized, and apparently convincing, narratives? Smith's work is methodologically instructive.
评分How should we go about the comparative approach? Why were certain paths chosen and certain stories told, whereas others forsaken? What are some of the deeply seated prejudices behind widely recognized, and apparently convincing, narratives? Smith's work is methodologically instructive.
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有