The Critique of Svatantra Reasoning by Candrakirti and Tsong-kha-pa. A Study of philosophical proof pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2026
- 佛教
- religious-studies
- Madhyamaka
- Prasangika
- Buddhist Philosophy
- Candrakirti
- Tsong-kha-pa
- Indo-Tibetan Studies
- Philosophical Proof
- Logic
- Epistemology
- German Philosophy
具体描述
作者简介
目录信息
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
The title itself, "The Critique of Svatantra Reasoning by Candrakirti and Tsong-kha-pa. A Study of philosophical proof according to two Prasangika Madhyamaka Traditions of ... and Indo-Tibetan Studies) (German Edition)," immediately signals a scholarly and in-depth examination of a core issue within Madhyamaka philosophy. My immediate thought is on Candrakirti's renowned critique of "Svatantra Reasoning." Candrakirti, as a leading exponent of the Prasangika Madhyamaka school, fundamentally rejected any form of argument that establishes itself as inherently valid. His core argument is that such self-established reasoning leads to conceptual entanglements and fails to reveal the ultimate nature of reality. Instead, he advocated for the "prasanga" method, which demonstrates the logical contradictions of an opponent's thesis without positing one's own independent reasoning. The inclusion of Tsong-kha-pa, the influential founder of the Gelug school in Tibet, brings a crucial comparative perspective. Tsong-kha-pa was a profound scholar who meticulously studied and systematized Indian Buddhist thought. The book's exploration of "two Prasangika Madhyamaka Traditions" likely delves into how Tsong-kha-pa interpreted Candrakirti's critique and whether his own philosophical framework, while adhering to Prasangika principles, presented a modified or distinct understanding of "philosophical proof." This suggests a rigorous analysis of their respective epistemological frameworks, the logical tools they employed, and the criteria they used to validate philosophical claims. The title promises to illuminate the intricate intellectual history and potential variations in reasoning strategies within the Prasangika lineage, as represented by these two pivotal figures in Indo-Tibetan Buddhist studies.
评分这本书的题目，《The Critique of Svatantra Reasoning by Candrakirti and Tsong-kha-pa. A Study of philosophical proof according to two Prasangika Madhyamaka Traditions of ... and Indo-Tibetan Studies) (German Edition)》，让我联想到中观哲学内部关于“自立论证”（Svatantra Reasoning）的旷日持久的争论。Candrakirti，作为应成派中观的奠基人之一，他极力批判一切形式的“自立论证”，认为其最终都会陷入自相矛盾，无法真正揭示空性。他提出的“应成”方法，即通过反驳对方的论点来达到目的，不建立自己的任何“自立”观点。这一点，对于理解Candrakirti哲学体系的“负面”或“破除性”特征至关重要。然而，Tsong-kha-pa，作为藏传佛教格鲁派的集大成者，他对Candrakirti思想的继承与发展，尤其是在论证逻辑上的阐释，常常是复杂且具有争议的。我想，这本书的核心议题很可能就是探讨Tsong-kha-pa如何理解和实践Candrakirti的“应成”原则，以及他是否在其哲学体系中，以某种方式“重新引入”了某些被Candrakirti所批判的“自立”的论证元素，即使只是在辩论的策略层面。这种“二元”的视角，即“two Prasangika Madhyamaka Traditions”，暗示着书中会对比分析Candrakirti和Tsong-kha-pa在理解“应成”和“自立”上的细微差别，甚至可能是方法论上的创新。对我而言，最吸引人的地方在于，作者将如何通过对“哲学证明”（philosophical proof）的深入研究，来揭示这两位思想家各自的论证策略和理论建构。在一个强调逻辑严谨性的哲学领域，对“证明”的理解本身就包含了对真理、知识以及如何获得知识的深刻洞察。这本书，从书名来看，无疑是要挖掘这些深层的东西。
评分The title itself, "The Critique of Svatantra Reasoning by Candrakirti and Tsong-kha-pa. A Study of philosophical proof according to two Prasangika Madhyamaka Traditions of ... and Indo-Tibetan Studies) (German Edition)," immediately signals a deeply specialized and academic endeavor. My initial thought gravitates towards the historical and philosophical significance of Candrakirti's critique of Svatantra Reasoning. Candrakirti, a pivotal figure in the Prasangika Madhyamaka tradition, famously argued against any positing of inherent existence or self-established validity in arguments. His method of reductio ad absurdum, the "consequence argument," aimed to expose the logical inconsistencies of opposing views without establishing an independent philosophical position of his own. This radical approach has been both lauded and debated for centuries. Now, introducing Tsong-kha-pa into this intellectual dialogue adds a fascinating layer. Tsong-kha-pa, the revered founder of the Gelug school, synthesized and systematized Buddhist philosophy in Tibet. His engagement with Candrakirti's works is a cornerstone of Tibetan scholasticism. The question that immediately arises is: how did Tsong-kha-pa interpret and apply Candrakirti's critique of Svatantra Reasoning? Did he adhere strictly to Candrakirti's radical interpretation, or did he introduce subtle modifications or perhaps a more nuanced understanding of what constitutes a valid "philosophical proof" within the Madhyamaka framework? The mention of "two Prasangika Madhyamaka Traditions" strongly suggests that the book will delineate distinct interpretative lineages or methodological approaches stemming from these two monumental thinkers. This implies a scholarly dissection of their respective philosophical methodologies, focusing on the very architecture of their arguments and the criteria they employed to establish or refute philosophical claims. The German Edition aspect, while not directly impacting the content, hints at a meticulously researched and rigorously presented work, likely drawing on extensive scholarship and possibly original textual analysis.
评分The title, "The Critique of Svatantra Reasoning by Candrakirti and Tsong-kha-pa. A Study of philosophical proof according to two Prasangika Madhyamaka Traditions of ... and Indo-Tibetan Studies) (German Edition)," immediately draws my attention to the sophisticated logical apparatus employed in Madhyamaka philosophy. Candrakirti's critique of "Svatantra Reasoning" is a pivotal moment in the development of this school. His assertion that any self-established argument, which posits its own inherent validity, ultimately fails to deconstruct the conventional and ultimate realities as understood by Madhyamaka, is a profound challenge to traditional philosophical methods. His emphasis on the "prasanga" or consequence argument, which demonstrates the logical contradictions of an opponent's position without positing one's own, is a hallmark of his approach. The inclusion of Tsong-kha-pa, who systematized and elaborated upon Candrakirti's teachings, is key. Tsong-kha-pa's meticulous analysis and reordering of Buddhist philosophical tenets, particularly his engagement with the concept of "philosophical proof," is of immense interest. The book likely explores how Tsong-kha-pa interpreted Candrakirti's critique and whether his own system, while rooted in Candrakirti, presented a distinct understanding or application of Svatantra Reasoning. The notion of "two Prasangika Madhyamaka Traditions" suggests a careful examination of the interpretative nuances and potentially diverging methodologies that emerged between Candrakirti's foundational work and Tsong-kha-pa's highly influential synthesis. This comparative study promises to shed light on the evolution of logical reasoning and the criteria for establishing valid philosophical assertions within the rich tradition of Indo-Tibetan Buddhist thought.
评分对于一本以“Critique of Svatantra Reasoning”为核心的书籍，我首先会关注它如何界定“Svatantra Reasoning”这个概念。自立论证，简单来说，就是一种不依赖于预设他方观念的独立成立的论证方式。在佛教哲学，尤其是中观学派内部，关于这种论证方式的有效性，一直存在着激烈的辩论。Candrakirti，作为 Prasangika Madhyamaka 的代表人物，他的核心论点之一便是破除一切自立的观点，包括对“自立论证”本身的依赖。他主张以“应成派”（Prasangika）的推理方式，即通过反驳对方论证的逻辑矛盾来揭示其虚假性，而非建立自身的独立论点。这无疑给“Svatantra Reasoning”本身带来了深刻的挑战。另一方面，Tsong-kha-pa，在继承Candrakirti思想的同时，又在论证方法上有所发展，他如何理解和运用“Svatantra Reasoning”，或者是否对其进行了修正，这将是这本书最引人入胜的部分。我猜想，作者可能要深入探讨，Tsong-kha-pa是否在某种程度上，重新解释了Candrakirti的“应成”方法，使其在实际的辩论中更具操作性，或者是在某些特定的哲学语境下，允许一定形式的“自立”存在。这本书如果能够清晰地阐释这一点，那么它将为理解中观哲学在不同传承中的发展提供至关重要的线索。Furthermore, the phrase "philosophical proof" suggests a deeper dive into the epistemic status of Buddhist philosophical claims. How do these traditions establish certainty? What constitutes valid evidence or inference? The interaction between Candrakirti and Tsong-kha-pa on these grounds could reveal a fascinating evolution of epistemological frameworks within Madhyamaka. The German edition aspect also implies a rigorous scholarly standard, possibly involving meticulous translation and commentary on original texts, which is highly commendable for such a specialized topic.
评分The title, "The Critique of Svatantra Reasoning by Candrakirti and Tsong-kha-pa. A Study of philosophical proof according to two Prasangika Madhyamaka Traditions of ... and Indo-Tibetan Studies) (German Edition)," immediately signals a deep dive into a crucial and often debated aspect of Madhyamaka philosophy. My initial curiosity is piqued by the "Critique of Svatantra Reasoning." Candrakirti, a pivotal figure in the Prasangika Madhyamaka tradition, is known for his dismantling of any form of "self-established reasoning," arguing that it invariably leads to logical contradictions and ultimately fails to grasp the nature of reality as emptiness. His method, the reductio ad absurdum, was designed to refute opposing views by showing their inherent untenability, rather than building a positive, independent thesis. This radical stance is central to the Prasangika understanding. The inclusion of Tsong-kha-pa, the founder of the Gelug school in Tibet, introduces a fascinating comparative element. Tsong-kha-pa meticulously studied and synthesized Indian Buddhist thought, and his interpretation of Candrakirti's works is a cornerstone of Tibetan scholasticism. The book likely explores how Tsong-kha-pa navigated Candrakirti's critique of Svatantra Reasoning. Did Tsong-kha-pa, in his systematic approach, find ways to articulate valid philosophical arguments within a Madhyamaka framework that Candrakirti might have viewed differently? This is where the "study of philosophical proof" comes into play. It suggests an examination of the very criteria for establishing truth claims and the logical mechanisms employed by these two intellectual giants. The mention of "two Prasangika Madhyamaka Traditions" hints at a nuanced exploration of distinct interpretative lineages or methodological divergences within the broader Prasangika school, as embodied by Candrakirti and Tsong-kha-pa. This promises a rich discussion on how fundamental Madhyamaka principles were understood, adapted, and perhaps even debated across different historical and geographical contexts.
评分From the title, "The Critique of Svatantra Reasoning by Candrakirti and Tsong-kha-pa. A Study of philosophical proof according to two Prasangika Madhyamaka Traditions of ... and Indo-Tibetan Studies) (German Edition)," my primary interest lies in understanding the philosophical implications of critiquing "Svatantra Reasoning." Candrakirti's position, as a leading proponent of Prasangika Madhyamaka, is instrumental in this critique. He argued that any reasoning that asserts its own independent validity, without relying on the refutation of an opponent's thesis, ultimately fails to achieve its philosophical aim and can lead to conceptual entanglement. His famous method of "consequences" (prasanga) aimed to highlight the logical absurdities inherent in any position that posits inherent existence or self-substantiation. The introduction of Tsong-kha-pa into this intellectual landscape is highly significant. Tsong-kha-pa, the towering figure of Tibetan Buddhism and founder of the Gelug school, engaged deeply with Candrakirti's philosophy and developed his own systematic approach to Buddhist thought. The book's exploration of "two Prasangika Madhyamaka Traditions" suggests a comparative analysis of how Candrakirti's radical critique was received, interpreted, and potentially adapted by Tsong-kha-pa. It raises crucial questions about the scope and limitations of "philosophical proof" within these traditions. How did they establish the validity of their claims about reality, consciousness, and the path to liberation? Did Tsong-kha-pa, in his quest for clarity and logical rigor, offer a distinct model of philosophical argumentation that differed from Candrakirti's more deconstructive approach? This promises a detailed examination of their respective epistemological frameworks and the methodologies they employed to demonstrate Buddhist philosophical truths. The "Indo-Tibetan Studies" context further assures a scholarly engagement with the source materials and historical development of these ideas.
评分这本书的书名本身就极具吸引力：《The Critique of Svatantra Reasoning by Candrakirti and Tsong-kha-pa. A Study of philosophical proof according to two Prasangika Madhyamaka Traditions of ... and Indo-Tibetan Studies) (German Edition)》。光是“Svatantra Reasoning”（自立论证）这个概念，就足以让任何对印度佛教哲学，特别是中观学派有深入研究的读者心头一震。Candrakirti，作为 Prasangika Madhyamaka（自续派中观）的集大成者，其对论证的批判性分析一直是学界关注的焦点。而Tsong-kha-pa，这位对藏传佛教格鲁派有着奠基性贡献的宗师，他对Candrakirti思想的继承与发展，尤其是在论证方法上的阐释，更是藏传佛教哲学体系的核心之一。这本书的德文版，更是为那些精通德语的学术研究者打开了另一扇深入研究的窗户。我非常好奇作者将如何梳理这两位大师在“Svatantra Reasoning”问题上的异同，他们各自的论证逻辑又是如何构建和维系的。特别是，作者提到“two Prasangika Madhyamaka Traditions”，这暗示着在Candrakirti和Tsong-kha-pa之间，甚至在他们各自的传承中，可能存在着对 Prasangika Madhyamaka 哲学 Proof（哲学证明）理解上的细微差异，甚至是更深层次的分歧。这种对哲学证明的精细考察，往往是理解一个哲学体系能否自圆其说，能否抵御他者诘难的关键。这绝非是一本泛泛而谈的哲学普及读物，而是旨在深入到概念的肌理，挖掘论证的根基，揭示思想的演变。考虑到 Indo-Tibetan Studies（印度-藏传研究）这个领域本身的复杂性和深度，这本书很可能融合了对梵文、藏文一手资料的考证，以及对历代中外学者的研究成果的梳理，其学术价值和严谨性不言而喻。我期待着它能提供一种全新的视角，来理解两位伟大的中观哲学家是如何在不同的历史语境和思想传承中，构建和捍卫他们对“真实”的认知。
评分My initial reaction to the title, "The Critique of Svatantra Reasoning by Candrakirti and Tsong-kha-pa. A Study of philosophical proof according to two Prasangika Madhyamaka Traditions of ... and Indo-Tibetan Studies) (German Edition)," is one of anticipation for a detailed exploration of logical argumentation within a highly specialized philosophical context. Candrakirti's critical stance on "Svatantra Reasoning" is fundamental to the Prasangika Madhyamaka tradition. His argument that any reasoning asserting its own independent validity is ultimately flawed, and that the path to understanding emptiness lies in deconstructing conventional and ultimate realities through the refutation of opposing views, is a cornerstone of his philosophy. The inclusion of Tsong-kha-pa, a key figure in the development of Tibetan Buddhism and the founder of the Gelug school, introduces a significant comparative dimension. Tsong-kha-pa's systematic approach and his profound engagement with Indian Buddhist texts, including Candrakirti's works, offer a rich ground for analysis. The book's focus on "two Prasangika Madhyamaka Traditions" strongly suggests a comparative study of their respective interpretations of Svatantra Reasoning and their methodologies for establishing "philosophical proof." This implies a deep dive into how they understood the nature of valid argumentation, the criteria for knowledge, and the means by which philosophical truths are demonstrated or unveiled. The title promises to unravel the intricate intellectual lineage and potential divergences in reasoning strategies between these two influential figures, within the broader context of Indo-Tibetan scholarship.
评分When I first saw the title "The Critique of Svatantra Reasoning by Candrakirti and Tsong-kha-pa. A Study of philosophical proof according to two Prasangika Madhyamaka Traditions of ... and Indo-Tibetan Studies) (German Edition)," my mind immediately went to the foundational debates within Madhyamaka philosophy concerning the nature of valid reasoning. Candrakirti, the paramount exponent of the Prasangika Madhyamaka school, is renowned for his trenchant critique of "Svatantra Reasoning," that is, reasoning that asserts its own independent validity or establishment. His central thesis, that all phenomena are empty of inherent existence, led him to advocate for a dialectical method that exposes the contradictions within opposing views, rather than constructing a positive, self-established philosophical system. This is the core of the "Prasangika" approach. The inclusion of Tsong-kha-pa, a towering figure in Tibetan Buddhism who established the Gelug school, brings a crucial dimension to this discussion. Tsong-kha-pa's exegetical brilliance and systematic reordering of Buddhist philosophy involved a deep engagement with Candrakirti's works. Therefore, the book likely delves into how Tsong-kha-pa interpreted Candrakirti's critique of Svatantra Reasoning. Did Tsong-kha-pa, in his efforts to establish a coherent philosophical system, perhaps re-evaluate or refine Candrakirti's stance on self-established arguments? This is where the concept of "philosophical proof" becomes paramount. How did these two masters understand the epistemological underpinnings of their respective philosophical assertions? What constituted a convincing argument or a valid demonstration of truth within their frameworks? The emphasis on "two Prasangika Madhyamaka Traditions" suggests a comparative study that aims to illuminate potential divergences or complementary interpretations of the Prasangika lineage, particularly in the realm of argumentation and the nature of philosophical certainty. The German edition simply underlines the scholarly rigor and intended audience for such an in-depth investigation.
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有