Herbert Gintis holds faculty positions at the Santa Fe Institute, Central European University, and University of Siena. He is the author of Game Theory Evolving (Princeton) and the coeditor of numerous books, including Moral Sentiments and Material Interests, Unequal Chances (Princeton), and Foundations of Human Sociality.
Game theory is central to understanding human behavior and relevant to all of the behavioral sciences--from biology and economics, to anthropology and political science. However, as The Bounds of Reason demonstrates, game theory alone cannot fully explain human behavior and should instead complement other key concepts championed by the behavioral disciplines. Herbert Gintis shows that just as game theory without broader social theory is merely technical bravado, so social theory without game theory is a handicapped enterprise.
Gintis illustrates, for instance, that game theory lacks explanations for when and how rational agents share beliefs. Rather than construct a social epistemology or reasoning process that reflects the real world, game theorists make unwarranted assumptions which imply that rational agents enjoy a commonality of beliefs. But, Gintis explains, humans possess unique forms of knowledge and understanding that move us beyond being merely rational creatures to being social creatures. For a better understanding of human behavior, Gintis champions a unified approach and in doing so shows that the dividing lines between the behavioral disciplines make no scientific sense. He asks, for example, why four separate fields--economics, sociology, anthropology, and social psychology--study social behavior and organization, yet their basic assumptions are wildly at variance. The author argues that we currently have the analytical tools to render the behavioral disciplines mutually coherent.
Combining the strengths of the classical, evolutionary, and behavioral fields, The Bounds of Reason reinvigorates the useful tools of game theory and offers innovative thinking for the behavioral sciences.
翻译的不怎么样,翻译的人没读懂。而且书上很多内容是堆砌,没有框架。 行为科学本来就很凌乱,指望一本书可以统一这些东西,显然这本书不行。 差的太远了。。 翻译的不怎么样,翻译的人没读懂。而且书上很多内容是堆砌,没有框架。 行为科学本来就很凌乱,指望一本书可以统...
评分翻译的不怎么样,翻译的人没读懂。而且书上很多内容是堆砌,没有框架。 行为科学本来就很凌乱,指望一本书可以统一这些东西,显然这本书不行。 差的太远了。。 翻译的不怎么样,翻译的人没读懂。而且书上很多内容是堆砌,没有框架。 行为科学本来就很凌乱,指望一本书可以统...
评分翻译的不怎么样,翻译的人没读懂。而且书上很多内容是堆砌,没有框架。 行为科学本来就很凌乱,指望一本书可以统一这些东西,显然这本书不行。 差的太远了。。 翻译的不怎么样,翻译的人没读懂。而且书上很多内容是堆砌,没有框架。 行为科学本来就很凌乱,指望一本书可以统...
评分翻译的不怎么样,翻译的人没读懂。而且书上很多内容是堆砌,没有框架。 行为科学本来就很凌乱,指望一本书可以统一这些东西,显然这本书不行。 差的太远了。。 翻译的不怎么样,翻译的人没读懂。而且书上很多内容是堆砌,没有框架。 行为科学本来就很凌乱,指望一本书可以统...
评分翻译的不怎么样,翻译的人没读懂。而且书上很多内容是堆砌,没有框架。 行为科学本来就很凌乱,指望一本书可以统一这些东西,显然这本书不行。 差的太远了。。 翻译的不怎么样,翻译的人没读懂。而且书上很多内容是堆砌,没有框架。 行为科学本来就很凌乱,指望一本书可以统...
如果用一句话概括本书的核心思想,那就是:理性的边界不是各种形式的非理性,而是人的各种形式的社会性。
评分无聊。这种提出一个理论又不解决问题的假设满大街都是
评分The author is probably one of the most well-read human beings on earth but the books is just mediocre.
评分无聊。这种提出一个理论又不解决问题的假设满大街都是
评分如果用一句话概括本书的核心思想,那就是:理性的边界不是各种形式的非理性,而是人的各种形式的社会性。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有