Preface
Nothing but history? Hyperbole, to be sure, and I ask the reader's indulgence. But I seek to show that a kind of reduction to history has been one cultural tendency in light of the eclipse of "metaphysics"—the term I use for foundationalist or essentialist philosophy and all the cultural weight it has carried. A new, post-Hegelian sense of the world as historical has been central to our recent experience, despite occasional suggestions that "history" ends along with traditional philosophy or modernity. My aim in this book is to understand this reduction to history, first by asking how it has played out in our own intellectual history over the past century or so, then by seeking to assess the cultural possibilities it affords us. At issue are not only the uses of historical understanding but also some fundamental aspects of personal experience.
My study is primarily an exercise in intellectual history, but it also has critical and even prescriptive dimensions. I emphasize, however, that in referring to "nothing but history" my aim is not to foster some sort of historiographical imperialism, affording professional historians new domain over the stuff of science, or art, or religion. We still seek the suprahistorical in many forms: novelists explore the universal human condition; natural scientists seek to discover the structure of an independently existing physical world; philosophers and theorists strive to establish truths that are not merely historically specific; in our more or less religious moments, we all wonder about the source or purpose of it all. Recent humanistic discussion suggests only that history stands in tension with these adjacent cultural domains. But by following the historical strand, clarifying what "history" has come to encompass, we can better explore the tensions along the areas of intersection.
In its prescriptive dimension, my study seeks to show, first, what is
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
― xii ―
necessary for a new culture of history to settle out as one autonomous component, in tension with others, in a postmetaphysical culture. But that historical component is itself tension-ridden, and I also seek to show what is required for a "moderate," reconstructive strand to emerge, playing off the extreme responses that also merit a place, but not an exclusive place, within a postmetaphysical culture of history. In any case, I venture into this somewhat prescriptive mode not to claim the last word but simply to contribute what I can to the ongoing conversation, the evolving cultural mix. I believe the argument of the book itself will make clear the spirit in which it is offered.
In bringing this study to completion, I have had the benefit of help and support from many quarters, and my acknowledgment here can only begin to express my gratitude. My way of comparing Benedetto Croce with his German contemporaries in an earlier study elicited some penetrating comments from Martin Jay that helped me see what I needed to do next. In the initial phases of this project, during the mid-1980s, I learned a great deal from the interdisciplinary study group fostered by the Humanities Department of the University of Rochester's Eastman School of Music. My particular thanks to my former colleagues Jonathan Baldo, Douglas Dempster, Thomas Donnan, Ruth Gross, Aimée Israel-Pelletier, and John McGowan. My Rochester connections also brought me together periodically with Hans Kellner, whose friendship I valued, just as I did the intellectual challenge he offered. I also take this occasion to remember the late Ann Clark Fehn, whose contributions to interdisciplinary discussion at the University of Rochester enriched us all.
Since moving to the University of Georgia in 1988, I have especially appreciated the encouragement of Lester Stephens, the interested but skeptical eye of Kirk Willis, who remains curiously partial to the British philosophical tradition, and the efforts of Bernard Dauenhauer, who did so much to foster humanistic discussion as founding director of the university's Humanities Center. I have also profited from the chance to discuss recent intellectual history with my doctoral student Mark Clark. In addition, I thank the University of Georgia Research Foundation for the Senior Faculty Research Grant that enabled me to devote much of my effort to this project during 1989–1990.
Speaking engagements in Italy during 1992 and 1994 gave me a chance to discuss my work in progress with several Italian colleagues. I am especially grateful to Mario Corsi, who helped me keep my recasting of Benedetto Croce in bounds. (For reasons that will become clear, I did not wish to play out of bounds.) I have also valued the comments of Domenico Settembrini and Vittorio Stella in response to my effort to place Croce in wider context.
In preparing the final manuscript for the University of California Press, I had the benefit of astute readings by Allan Megill and a second, anonymous reader. My revisions will not fully have satisfied either of them, but the book is surely stronger thanks to their objections, questions, and suggestions. For helping me
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
― xiii ―
through the several hurdles, I am grateful to the three sponsoring editors at California who have had a hand in this project, Alain Hénon, Eileen McWilliam, and Edward Dimendberg. It has also been a pleasure to work with Michelle Bonnice and Sheila Berg in bringing the manuscript into print.
The continuing support and tolerant good humor of my family have been essential to me as I labored on this book. So thanks again to Ellen, Trina, and Anthony for their patience—but also for their growing interest in my work. As they have become a formidable and engaging audience, I have fleetingly felt that having three children in college at the same time isn't so bad after all. And thanks to Beth, as always, for her unfailing, if occasionally bemused, support. As she knows, only her bemusement enables me to place my work in such perfect perspective.
The book is dedicated to Robert Freeman, Director of the University of Rochester's Eastman School of Music, where I had the privilege of teaching as a member of the Humanities Department from 1978 to 1988. Without his friendship, encouragement, and support at that pivotal stage of my career, this book would not have been possible.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书带给我的冲击感,更多来源于其独特的结构布局和对时间观的颠覆性处理。它不是一个线性向前推进的故事,更像是一系列精心设计的、不同时间点上闪烁的灯塔,它们彼此呼应,通过意象和主题的反复出现,构建起一种循环往复的历史宿命感。我必须称赞作者在跨文化、跨地域叙事方面的驾驭能力,他巧妙地在看似不相关的事件之间架设起桥梁,揭示出人类经验中那些惊人的相似性,无论是远古的衰落还是近代的变革,其内核似乎总有共通之处。阅读的体验是一种不断重组认知地图的过程,你以为你已经理解了某个阶段的脉络,下一章却会用一个完全意想不到的侧面来颠覆你的认知。书中对细节的描摹达到了近乎偏执的程度,那些日常生活的微小片段——一顿晚餐的摆设,一件衣物的质地——都被赋予了重大的历史含义,使得冰冷的历史一下子鲜活了起来,充满了人间的烟火气。这种对“微观历史”的细致捕捉,让宏大的主题变得触手可及,极大地增强了文本的可信度与感染力。
评分说实话,这本书的阅读门槛稍高,它要求读者具备一定的历史耐性和对哲学思辨的兴趣。但如果你愿意投入时间,它所给予的回报是极其丰厚的。作者在探讨权力、道德与记忆这几个核心议题时,展现出了一种近乎冷峻的客观性。他像一个冷静的观察者,站在历史的断层面上,审视着人类在不同压力下展现出的复杂人性。我个人认为,此书最成功的地方在于它成功地模糊了“过去”与“现在”的界限。通过一系列精妙的对仗和对比,它暗示了我们今日所处的困境,在某种程度上,不过是古老问题的现代变奏。书中没有廉价的安慰或英雄主义的赞歌,有的只是对真相的近乎残酷的探求。那些引用的文献和一手资料的运用非常高明,它们并非简单地堆砌,而是巧妙地嵌入叙事流中,作为支撑论点的坚实基石。如果你期待的是轻松愉快的阅读体验,那么这本书可能不太适合你;但如果你渴望一场深刻的、能让你在合上书页后仍久久沉思的智力冒险,那么这本书绝对值得你投入精力去探索。
评分这本书的语言风格如同音乐中的复调结构,多种声音和主题同时奏响,形成了一种丰富而立体的听觉效果。作者非常擅长运用对比手法,将光明与黑暗、希望与绝望、进步与倒退并置,从而避免了单向度的叙事倾向。我特别欣赏其中那种对于“时间流逝”本身所产生的宿命感描写,它不是一种悲观的论调,而更像是一种对存在本质的深刻体悟——万物皆在变化,但某些核心的人类困境却恒久不变。在阅读过程中,我发现自己频繁地停下来,不是因为内容晦涩,而是因为某些句子或段落的表达方式太过精妙,需要时间去细细品味其背后的多重含义。作者对历史细节的把握精准到令人咋舌,但这并未让文本变得沉重,反而因为这种真实感而更具穿透力。它成功地将严肃的历史研究提升到了一种近乎文学的高度,让学术的严谨与艺术的感染力完美融合。读完后,我感觉自己的世界观被轻轻地重塑了一下,对许多既定概念产生了新的疑问和理解,这才是真正优秀的非虚构作品所能给予的最高褒奖。
评分我得承认,初翻开这本书时,我对它抱持着一种审慎的期待,毕竟历史题材的著作往往容易陷入枯燥的说教或过度浪漫化的陷阱。然而,出乎意料的是,作者成功地避开了这些老套路,而是采用了一种近乎侦探小说般的笔法来重构过去。他并没有试图给出一个“标准答案”式的结论,反而更倾向于提出那些引人深思的问题,引导我们去质疑那些被视为理所当然的历史定论。这种批判性的视角贯穿始终,它要求读者保持警觉,不要轻易接受任何单一的解释。我特别喜欢书中那种对“沉默的声音”的关注,那些往往被宏大叙事所掩盖的边缘群体和被遗忘的角落,在这里得到了充分的展现和声音。阅读的过程更像是一场辩论,作者不断地抛出证据和视角,让你无法停止思考“如果当初…会怎样?”这种反事实的假设。文字的风格是极其直接和犀利的,没有多余的修饰,直击问题的核心,这使得整体的阅读体验充满了智力上的挑战和愉悦感。对于那些厌倦了教科书式历史叙述的读者来说,这本书无疑是一剂强心针。
评分这部作品的叙事结构就像是一张错综复杂的挂毯,每一条线索都紧密地交织在一起,共同编织出一个关于过去与现在之间微妙平衡的宏大图景。作者在处理历史事件的选取上展现出惊人的洞察力,他并非简单地罗列事实,而是像一位技艺高超的雕刻家,从浩瀚的史料中精选出那些能够引发当代读者共鸣的、具有深刻象征意义的瞬间。我尤其欣赏他对时代背景下人物心理深度的挖掘,那种身处历史洪流中的个体挣扎与抉择,被描绘得淋漓尽致,让人在阅读时仿佛能够切身感受到那个特定时期的空气湿度和情绪张力。全书的节奏控制堪称一绝,时而如平静的湖面,娓娓道来,时而又如疾风骤雨,将读者猛地卷入高潮迭起的冲突之中。这种张弛有度的叙事策略,使得即便是对特定历史时期不太熟悉的读者,也能被情节牢牢吸引,并从中汲取到关于人类境遇的普遍性思考。文字的打磨也极其考究,某些段落的辞藻华美而不失力量,充满了古典的韵味,读来令人心神荡漾,仿佛在品味陈年的佳酿。总而言之,这是一次深入且令人满足的精神漫游。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有