评分
评分
评分
评分
Lessing touched here on a powerful trope of heroic age morality, which, as we have seen, had fired Winckelmann’s imagination and defined both a wistful aspiration and a historical problem for German Philhellenism. Lessing’s attack on Smith was followed by a biting critique of Cicero, whose Tusculan Disputations had disdained the expression of pain.
评分Lessing touched here on a powerful trope of heroic age morality, which, as we have seen, had fired Winckelmann’s imagination and defined both a wistful aspiration and a historical problem for German Philhellenism. Lessing’s attack on Smith was followed by a biting critique of Cicero, whose Tusculan Disputations had disdained the expression of pain.
评分Lessing touched here on a powerful trope of heroic age morality, which, as we have seen, had fired Winckelmann’s imagination and defined both a wistful aspiration and a historical problem for German Philhellenism. Lessing’s attack on Smith was followed by a biting critique of Cicero, whose Tusculan Disputations had disdained the expression of pain.
评分Lessing touched here on a powerful trope of heroic age morality, which, as we have seen, had fired Winckelmann’s imagination and defined both a wistful aspiration and a historical problem for German Philhellenism. Lessing’s attack on Smith was followed by a biting critique of Cicero, whose Tusculan Disputations had disdained the expression of pain.
评分Lessing touched here on a powerful trope of heroic age morality, which, as we have seen, had fired Winckelmann’s imagination and defined both a wistful aspiration and a historical problem for German Philhellenism. Lessing’s attack on Smith was followed by a biting critique of Cicero, whose Tusculan Disputations had disdained the expression of pain.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有