This book provides a timely, compelling, multidisciplinary critique of the largely tacit set of assumptions funding Modernity in the West. A partnership between Michael Polanyi and Charles Taylor's thought promises to cast the errors of the past in a new light, to graciously show how these errors can be amended, and to provide a specific cartography of how we can responsibly and meaningfully explore new possibilities for ethics, political society, and religion in a post-modern modernity.
Editorial Reviews
Review
“Charles Lowney has shown here the convergence between the critiques of modern narrow rationalism offered by Michael Polanyi, on one hand, and 20th Century phenomenology (which was my starting point), on the other. A lot of interesting insights become available when these and other critiques are brought into contact. We are all in Lowney's debt for his valuable contribution.” (Charles Taylor, McGill University, author of A Secular Age, Modern Social Imaginaries and Sources of the Self)
“Readers of this collection will be well rewarded. There are two main paths to the task of critiquing modernity, the deconstructive and the reconstructive paths. The authors of the essays comprising this book have wisely chosen the latter, and they do so with clarity, thoroughness, and insight. Professor Lowney should be commended for putting this collection together, as well as for writing several of the essays himself. The various approaches to Michael Polanyi’s thought are especially welcomed.” (Jerry Gill, author of Deep Postmodernism: Whitehead, Wittgenstein, Merleau-Ponty and Polanyi, 2010)
“A splendid combination of philosophical erudition and moral sensitivity, this work brings into conversation two of the most important philosophers of our time, Michael Polanyi and Charles Taylor. The substantive commentaries, comparisons, and criticisms gathered in this volume offer readers convincing alternatives to the intellectually dubious scientism and corrosive moral relativism of our secular age. Strongly recommended.” (John F. Haught, Georgetown University, author of The New Cosmic Story: Inside Our Awakening Universe , 2017)
“Lowney and his collaborators show that Charles Taylor extends the work of Michael Polanyi and Marjorie Grene, constituting a powerful alternative form of modernity that avoids the dead end of C.P. Snow’s The Two Cultures. An important signpost on the road not (yet) taken.” (Lawrence Cahoone, Holy Cross, author of The Orders of Nature (2014), The Dilemma of Modernity (1988), and The Ends of Philosophy: Pragmatism, Foundationalism and Postmodernism , 2002)
“Modern times have tended to be dominated by a Cartesian model that is almost exclusively narrowly rationalistic/intellectualist and reductionist. Two prominent challenges to that view have come from Charles Taylor and Michael Polanyi. The time is surely ripe for a deeper engagement between the two and that this volume undoubtedly provides. Its contributors wrestle with the distinctive notions of each (such as Polanyi’s tacit knowledge and emergent being and Taylor’s authenticity and re-enchantment) to see how far a more integrated and inclusive alternative approach can be created.” (David Brown FBA is Emeritus Professor of Theology, Aesthetics and Culture at the University of St Andrews)
From the Back Cover
This book provides a timely, compelling, multidisciplinary critique of the largely tacit set of assumptions funding Modernity in the West. A partnership between Michael Polanyi and Charles Taylor's thought promises to cast the errors of the past in a new light, to graciously show how these errors can be amended, and to provide a specific cartography of how we can responsibly and meaningfully explore new possibilities for ethics, political society, and religion in a post-modern modernity.
About the Author
Charles W. Lowney II is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Hollins University, Virginia, USA.
评分
评分
评分
评分
在阅读的整体感受上,这本书给我带来了一种久违的、思想被真正“激活”的愉悦感。它不像某些理论著作那样,读完后留下的是一堆可以背诵的术语和结论,而更像是一次智力上的马拉松训练,让读者的批判性思维得到了全方位的锻炼。它迫使你重新审视那些习以为常的概念——比如“理性”、“主体性”或“社群”——在特定的历史语境下它们是如何被塑形和扭曲的。读完合上书本的那一刻,我发现自己对当下的一些社会现象和文化思潮的解读视角,已经发生了微妙但本质的位移。这种潜移默化的影响,才是优秀学术著作的真正价值所在,它不是提供现成的答案,而是升级了你提问的方式。这种持久的、在日常生活中不断回响的思想震动,让我确信这是一部值得反复咀嚼和长久留存的重量级作品。
评分我发现这本书在行文逻辑的推进上展现出一种令人赞叹的结构美感。作者似乎深谙如何引导读者的思维,从开篇抛出的宏大议题,到后续层层递进的细微分析,每一步的过渡都自然得像是呼吸一般顺畅,几乎不需要读者费力去“找”论证的脉络。这种流畅性并非源于语言的简化,恰恰相反,即便论及一些晦涩的哲学概念,作者也能通过精妙的组织,让其逻辑线索清晰可见,仿佛是在一个复杂的迷宫中,有人用一根看不见的线牵引着你,确保你不会迷失方向。特别是当不同思想家的观点被引入进行比较和对比时,那种手术刀般的精准切割和重组能力,让人拍案叫绝。它不是简单地堆砌引文或罗列主张,而是将这些思想碎片有机地熔铸在一起,形成一个新的、具有生命力的论证整体。阅读过程中,我常常停下来,不是因为不理解,而是因为被这种结构上的巧妙设计所折服,需要时间去细细品味这种布局的匠心。这本著作成功地避免了许多学术专著常见的“支离破碎”感,提供了一种整体性的、高密度的阅读体验。
评分从作者的笔调中,我捕捉到一种非常独特的情感色彩,那是一种介于冷静的学术批判与深沉的人文关怀之间的微妙平衡。你不会感受到那种咄咄逼人的、试图将前人彻底颠覆的激进姿态,相反,是一种带着敬意去审视、去叩问的精神。这种语气的克制,反而使得其批判更具穿透力——它不诉诸情绪,而是依赖于论证的力量。在探讨现代性所带来的异化问题时,作者的文字中流露出一种对人类经验完整性的深切忧虑,仿佛在为某种正在逝去的美好价值进行辩护。我特别留意到几个关键的转折点,作者似乎在那些地方稍微放缓了语速,用更具思辨性的问句来替代肯定的陈述,这种手法有效地将读者拉入到一种共同探索的状态,而不是单向灌输。这种“陪伴式”的论述风格,极大地增强了阅读的代入感,让人觉得作者是与你并肩站在高处,一同俯瞰脚下复杂的思想景观,共同面对那些难以解答的时代困境。
评分这本书的装帧设计给我留下了极其深刻的印象,那种朴实中透露出一种厚重感,封面的排版和字体选择都显得相当考究,让人在拿起书的那一刻就能感受到作者对这份学术探索的严肃态度。我尤其欣赏它所采用的纸张质感,那种微微粗糙却又韧性十足的手感,在指尖流淌时,带来一种久违的阅读的仪式感。与市面上那些追求光鲜亮丽的平装本不同,这本书似乎更倾向于一种经典的、经得起时间考验的风格,仿佛它本身就是一件值得珍藏的物品,而不仅仅是信息的载体。内页的校对工作做得极其出色,字里行间几乎找不到任何令人分心的印刷错误,这极大地保证了阅读的流畅性,尤其是在处理复杂的哲学论述时,这种细节上的精确性显得尤为重要。翻阅时,我注意到书脊的处理也十分巧妙,即便是初次展开,也能平稳地停留在任何一页,这对于需要频繁对照前后文的学术阅读者来说,无疑是一个巨大的福音。整体而言,这本书在物理形态上成功地传达了一种沉静而坚定的学术气质,让人在未开始阅读内容之前,就已经对作者的治学态度有了一个初步且积极的预判。
评分这本书的引文和注释系统堪称典范,它体现了作者对学术规范的极高尊重,同时也极大地丰富了读者的延伸学习路径。我发现,许多关键概念的界定时,作者不仅清晰地阐述了自己的理解,还通过详尽的脚注,将原始文本的语境和细微差别勾勒得淋漓尽致。这使得原本可能陷入歧义的术语变得稳固可靠,为后续的论证打下了坚实的基础。更值得称赞的是,那些看似随意的、在正文中穿插的旁注,往往是思想火花的迸发点,它们像是在一个严肃的课堂上,老师突然指向窗外,提示你注意一个更广阔的背景。对于希望深入钻研特定领域的读者来说,这套注释系统无疑是一份宝贵的地图,它指引你进入更深层的文献海洋,而无需在阅读主要文本时被这些“支流”所干扰。这种将主体叙事与学术支撑完美分离又紧密联系的处理方式,是许多严肃著作应该效仿的。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有