約翰‧阿姆斯特朗 (John Armstrong)
1966年生於英國格拉斯哥。曾任倫敦大學美學課程的研究員和主任,現任墨爾本大學哲學係副教授。著有《歌德:愛與生命》、《美的神秘力量》等作品。
说实话这本书我没有重头到尾地看,也不知道当初为什么看这本书,或许里面有一句话值得参考也仅仅是这句话。大概意思是这样吧,你喜欢的这个人或许你并不是喜欢他,你只是喜欢的人完美的倒影折射在他身上,一切活在你的想象中,当然也就喜欢了!其它的没什么好说的了,全部都是...
評分 評分带着一丝的疑惑和求解看了这本书, 其实看了两遍之后我还是看不懂, 至少是不懂 ------ “爱”这么一个感性的话题, 作者凭什么写得这么理性, 这么有条理, 另一方面来说这就是矛盾了! 不过,总体而言,还是比较推荐的~~ 对爱有问题的~
評分 評分The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
评分The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
评分The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
评分The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
评分The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有