具体描述
作者简介
约翰‧阿姆斯特朗 (John Armstrong)
1966年生于英国格拉斯哥。曾任伦敦大学美学课程的研究员和主任,现任墨尔本大学哲学系副教授。著有《歌德:爱与生命》、《美的神秘力量》等作品。
目录信息
读后感
哲學一詞,當下已高度簡化為「恩考」,君不見書店豬肉桌上一系列什麼生活哲學、飲食哲學、喝水哲學云云,好像有一點文字,加兩分思考就是哲學。哲學,作為愛智與尋找終極(ultimate)的本質,早被人拋諸腦後。John Armstrong的《愛情的條件》,副題<親密關係的哲學>,卻是眾...
哲學一詞,當下已高度簡化為「恩考」,君不見書店豬肉桌上一系列什麼生活哲學、飲食哲學、喝水哲學云云,好像有一點文字,加兩分思考就是哲學。哲學,作為愛智與尋找終極(ultimate)的本質,早被人拋諸腦後。John Armstrong的《愛情的條件》,副題<親密關係的哲學>,卻是眾...
爱有两种历史: 一种是随着文化的巨大变化而产生的一般历史; 另一种是个人的历史,在每一个会爱上他人的生命中发展成型; 爱与被爱——爱的正面 苏格拉底在《会饮篇》中说到对爱人的渴望就如同求知欲一样,对于知识,人并非全然无知,而是略有所知,我们喜欢别人身上的特质也...
还没看过这本书,但从 http://www.yesasia.com/global/愛情的條件-親密關係的哲學/1020122674-0-0-0-zh_TW/info.html 这里的介绍,能看到一点内容的梗概。
用户评价
The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.