图书标签: 哲学   

喜欢 Conditions of Love 的读者还喜欢

The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.

The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.

The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.

The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.

The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.

哲學一詞，當下已高度簡化為「恩考」，君不見書店豬肉桌上一系列什麼生活哲學、飲食哲學、喝水哲學云云，好像有一點文字，加兩分思考就是哲學。哲學，作為愛智與尋找終極（ultimate）的本質，早被人拋諸腦後。John Armstrong的《愛情的條件》，副題＜親密關係的哲學＞，卻是眾...

还没看过这本书，但从 http://www.yesasia.com/global/愛情的條件-親密關係的哲學/1020122674-0-0-0-zh_TW/info.html 这里的介绍，能看到一点内容的梗概。  

带着一丝的疑惑和求解看了这本书， 其实看了两遍之后我还是看不懂， 至少是不懂 ------ “爱”这么一个感性的话题， 作者凭什么写得这么理性， 这么有条理， 另一方面来说这就是矛盾了！ 不过，总体而言，还是比较推荐的~~ 对爱有问题的~  

哲學一詞，當下已高度簡化為「恩考」，君不見書店豬肉桌上一系列什麼生活哲學、飲食哲學、喝水哲學云云，好像有一點文字，加兩分思考就是哲學。哲學，作為愛智與尋找終極（ultimate）的本質，早被人拋諸腦後。John Armstrong的《愛情的條件》，副題＜親密關係的哲學＞，卻是眾...

哲學一詞，當下已高度簡化為「恩考」，君不見書店豬肉桌上一系列什麼生活哲學、飲食哲學、喝水哲學云云，好像有一點文字，加兩分思考就是哲學。哲學，作為愛智與尋找終極（ultimate）的本質，早被人拋諸腦後。John Armstrong的《愛情的條件》，副題＜親密關係的哲學＞，卻是眾...