图书标签: 哲学   

喜欢 Conditions of Love 的读者还喜欢

The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.

The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.

The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.

The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.

The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.

还没看过这本书，但从 http://www.yesasia.com/global/愛情的條件-親密關係的哲學/1020122674-0-0-0-zh_TW/info.html 这里的介绍，能看到一点内容的梗概。  

教育普及的年代，不认识字的叫文盲；法制社会，不懂法律的叫法盲；21世纪，剩男剩女当道，有的从小学就开始早恋，谈了十几年的恋爱，换了无数了不能长久的对象，却还搞不清楚爱是什么。这样的人，可不可以被称作“爱盲”？ 爱是什么？这是我们阅读这本书极想获取的答案。我们...  

爱有两种历史： 一种是随着文化的巨大变化而产生的一般历史； 另一种是个人的历史，在每一个会爱上他人的生命中发展成型； 爱与被爱——爱的正面 苏格拉底在《会饮篇》中说到对爱人的渴望就如同求知欲一样，对于知识，人并非全然无知，而是略有所知，我们喜欢别人身上的特质也...  

带着一丝的疑惑和求解看了这本书， 其实看了两遍之后我还是看不懂， 至少是不懂 ------ “爱”这么一个感性的话题， 作者凭什么写得这么理性， 这么有条理， 另一方面来说这就是矛盾了！ 不过，总体而言，还是比较推荐的~~ 对爱有问题的~  

某天晚上的电台节目。女主播念一篇很长的“暖文章”，其中有一句话的大意是说，判断一个人是否值得交往，需要4个月的相处时间。 如果把每星期见面2次作为频率标准的话，4个月大约需要见面30余次。当然，这里的见面，指的是约会，不管是吃饭、逛街，还是看电影、去公园，必须是...