Strange Encounters pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2024

☆☆☆☆☆
简体网页||繁体网页

Sara Ahmed

Routledge

2000-9-19

224

USD 55.95

Paperback

9780415201858

图书标签: 文化研究英文英国社会学性别哲学 affect

喜欢 Strange Encounters 的读者还喜欢

下载链接在页面底部

点击这里下载

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到小哈图书下载中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

发表于2024-05-18

Strange Encounters epub 下载 mobi 下载 pdf 下载 txt 电子书下载 2024

Strange Encounters pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2024

图书描述

Strange Encounters examines the relationship between strangers, embodiment and community. It challenges the assumptions that the stranger is simply anybody we do not recognize and instead proposes that he or she is socially constructed as somebody we already know. In this fascinating new book Saran Ahmed analyses a diverse range of texts which produce the figure of 'the stranger', showing that it has alternatively been expelled as the origin of danger - such as in neighbourhood watch or celebrated at the origin of difference - as in multiculturalism. However, the author argues that both of these standpoints are problematic as they involve 'stranger fetishism'; they assume that the stranger 'has a life of its own'. Using feminist and postcolonial theory this book examines the impact of multiculturalism and globalization on embodiment and community whilst considering the ethical and political implication of its critique for post-colonial feminism.

Strange Encounters 下载 mobi epub pdf txt 电子书

著者简介

图书目录

Strange Encounters pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载

想要找书就要到小哈图书下载中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

只看了引言、第一章、第三章、第五章。把“完全接受stranger”、“不接受stranger”和“部分接受stranger”全怼了一遍。但是却没有明确说明，到底什么是“stranger”。stranger和others有什么不同?stranger是本体论意义上的吗？stranger能不能成为we？stranger成为we之后是否意味着被同化？“we”是不是就意味着绝对统一？作者认为不应该让stranger成为we，而应该让stranger找到其in place。那么这个place是否完全圈地自萌？而绝对的stranger又如何和其他文化相处？是否会因此成为作者所说的stranger danger？感觉很多问题没有说明白，推论的逻辑不够清晰，且对于文本的分析有时过于扣字眼，缺乏说服力。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

语言还是不够简练，论述的功底比较一般。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

brilliant work!

评分☆☆☆☆☆

语言还是不够简练，论述的功底比较一般。

评分☆☆☆☆☆