Disorganizing China pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載 2024

☆☆☆☆☆
簡體網頁||繁體網頁

Eddy U

Stanford University Press

2007-6-28

296

USD 57.50

Hardcover

9780804756891

圖書標籤: 共和國中國研究 Politics

喜歡 Disorganizing China 的讀者還喜歡

下載链接在页面底部

點擊這裡下載

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製鏈接

想要找書就要到小哈圖書下載中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

发表于2024-09-22

Disorganizing China epub 下載 mobi 下載 pdf 下載 txt 電子書下載 2024

Disorganizing China pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載 2024

圖書描述

this book offers a new interpretation of socialism and its failure in the last century, and takes on the conventional view that socialist China and other Soviet-type societies represented the domination of bureaucracy. Using a wealth of original archival sources, interview data, and comparative material, Eddy U argues that these societies were not bureaucratic enough. The ruling regimes established a form of workplace administration that is the antithesis of modern bureaucratic organization. Because the workplace lacked rational rules and practices, Soviet-type societies were marred by technical inefficiency, political resentment, and social friction. But U does not merely expose workplace disorganization in Soviet-type societies; his theoretically and empirically grounded research raises questions about the contention that socialism has been proven unworkable. He concludes that strengthening the rational capacity of the state may still be the key to improving social and economic justice.

Disorganizing China 下載 mobi epub pdf txt 電子書

著者簡介

Eddy U has tought in the Department of Chinese Studies at the University of Sydney, and is an associate professor of sociology at University of California, Davis.

圖書目錄

Disorganizing China pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載

想要找書就要到小哈圖書下載中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

用戶評價

評分☆☆☆☆☆

Solidly and neatly argued scholarship, clear engagement with Weber. The analytical framework has the shell but not the content of going beyond Eurocentric paradigms, but some empirical observations are still useful. Shall read alongside Gross, Ghosh, and Andreas.The criticism of Neo Liberalism in the conclusion is inadequate or even unnecessary.

評分☆☆☆☆☆