The Handbook of Mathematical Logic is an attempt to share with the entire mathematical community some modern developments in logic. We have selected from the wealth of topics available some of those which deal with the basic concerns of the subject, or are particularly important for applications to other parts of mathematics, or both.
Mathematical logic is traditionally divided into four parts: model theory, set theory, recursion theory and proof theory. We have followed this division, for lack of a better one, in arranging this book. It made the placement of chapters where there is interaction of several parts of logic a difficult matter, so the division should be taken with a grain of salt. Each of the four parts begins with a short guide to the chapters that follow. The first chapter or two in each part are introductory in scope. More advanced chapters follow, as do chapters on applied or applicable parts of mathemat- ical logic. Each chapter is definitely written for someone who is not a specialist in the field in question. On the other hand, each chapter has its own intended audience which varies from chapter to chapter. In particular, there are some chapters which are not written for the general mathematician, but rather are aimed at logicians in one field by logicians in another.
We hope that many mathematicians will pick up this book out of idle curiosity and leaf through it to get a feeling for what is going on in another part of mathematics. It is hard to imagine a mathematician who could spend ten minutes doing this without wanting to pursue a few chapters, and the introductory sections of others, in some detail. It is an opportunity that hasn’t existed before and is the reason for the Handbook.
Jon Barwise
Kenneth Jon Barwise (June 29, 1942 – March 5, 2000) was an American mathematician, philosopher and logician who proposed some fundamental revisions to the way that logic is understood and used.
Born in Independence, Missouri to Kenneth T. and Evelyn, he was a precocious child.
A pupil of Solomon Feferman at Stanford University, Barwise started his research in infinitary logic. After positions as assistant professor at the Universities of Yale and Wisconsin, during which time his interests turned to natural language, he returned to Stanford in 1983 to direct the Center for the Study of Language and Information. He began teaching at Indiana University in 1990. He was elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1999.[1]
Barwise contended that, by being explicit about the context in which a proposition is made, the situation, many problems in the application of logic can be eliminated. He sought ... to understand meaning and inference within a general theory of information, one that takes us outside the realm of sentences and relations between sentences of any language, natural or formal. In particular, he claimed that such an approach resolved the liar paradox. He made use of Peter Aczel's non-well-founded set theory in understanding "vicious circles" of reasoning.
Barwise, along with his former colleague at Stanford John Etchemendy, was the author of the popular logic textbook Language, Proof and Logic. Unlike the Handbook which was a survey of the state of the art of Mathematical Logic c. 1975, this work targeted elementary logic. The text is notable for including computer-aided homework problems, some of which provide visual representations of logical problems. During his time at Stanford, he was also the first Director of the Symbolic Systems Program, an interdepartmental degree program focusing on the relationships between cognition, language, logic, and computation. The K. Jon Barwise Award for Distinguished Contributions to the Symbolic Systems Program has been given periodically since 2001.
评分
评分
评分
评分
说实话,我对这种专著的阅读体验往往是起起伏伏的。有些章节读起来如沐春风,仿佛那些困扰我许久的难题迎刃而解;但有些地方,比如深入到复杂模型的构造或某些高度技术性的证明时,确实需要反复揣摩,甚至需要借助其他辅助材料。我一直在寻找一本能够有效弥合理论与应用之间鸿沟的书籍。虽然数理逻辑本身偏向理论,但它对计算机科学、人工智能乃至语言学的底层影响是巨大的。我希望这本书能在介绍完纯粹的逻辑理论后,能提供一些关于这些理论如何在实际的计算或推理系统中得到体现的讨论,哪怕只是简短的论述。一本好的逻辑著作不应该将自己封闭在纯粹的象牙塔内,它应该能展示其工具的强大和普适性,让读者感受到逻辑不仅仅是数学家的玩具,更是我们理解信息和推理本质的钥匙。
评分这本书的深度无疑是毋庸置疑的,它定位于“基础研究”领域,暗示着它可能不会花太多篇幅在那些已被广泛传播和简化的入门级内容上。我更期待的是那些关于公理化集合论(特别是大基数公理的地位)或者非标准分析中逻辑基础的探讨。这些前沿或次前沿的议题,往往是衡量一本逻辑专著是否具有真正学术价值的关键指标。我希望作者能够清晰地界定不同公理化体系的“强度”和它们在保持数学理论完备性上的作用。同时,对于集合论中的选择公理,我希望看到更深入的、关于其哲学含义的辩论,而不是仅仅将其作为一个操作工具来使用。阅读这样的书籍,过程本身就是一种智力上的磨砺,它要求你时刻保持警觉,对每一个定义和推论背后的假设保持怀疑和审视的态度。
评分拿到这本书的时候,我首先被它的装帧和字体排版所吸引,那种经典的学术书籍设计,让人立刻进入一种沉浸式的学习状态。我试着翻阅了其中关于递归函数和可判定性问题的那一部分,感觉作者的行文逻辑非常清晰,层层递进,即使是面对高度抽象的概念,也能通过精妙的例子逐步引导读者建立直观理解。我特别欣赏作者在处理那些历史上有争议的数学基础问题时所表现出的审慎态度,没有急于给出绝对的结论,而是客观地呈现了不同学派的论证过程和局限性。这对于希望深入研究数学哲学的人来说至关重要,因为它教会我们如何批判性地看待那些看似不证自明的“真理”。我希望它能完整地覆盖图灵机模型、递归函数论以及判定性问题在不同逻辑系统下的表现,并且用严谨的符号语言来表达这些概念,确保没有任何歧义。
评分这本书的书名听起来就让人感到一丝严肃和深邃,那种沉甸甸的分量感,仿佛能透过书脊感受到数学的宏大结构。我最初被它吸引,是因为我对数学哲学和逻辑基础的兴趣。我一直在寻找一本能够系统地梳理现代数理逻辑发展脉络的著作,尤其是那些关于集合论、可计算性理论和模型论的经典论述。这类书籍通常需要扎实的数学背景才能驾驭,我期待它能提供深入的洞察,而不是浮于表面的介绍。我特别关注的是它对哥德尔不完备性定理的阐释是否能带来新的视角,或者对直觉主义逻辑与经典逻辑的根本分歧是否有细致的比较。同时,如果它能在逻辑的非经典分支,比如模态逻辑或者模糊逻辑方面有所建树,那就更完美了。这不仅仅是一本教科书,更像是一次智力上的攀登,目标是触及数学思维的源头,理解我们赖以构建整个数学大厦的那些基本公理和推理规则是如何被检验和奠基的。
评分从整体上看,我希望这本书能够提供一种统一的、连贯的视角来审视整个数理逻辑的版图。逻辑学研究的广度很大,从形式系统、证明论到语义学,每一个分支都有其独特的魅力和复杂性。我最希望看到的是,作者如何将这些看似分散的领域,通过一个核心的哲学或数学框架整合起来。比如,如何用一种统一的方式来讨论“真理”和“可证明性”之间的微妙关系,并展示这些概念在不同逻辑层级上是如何演变的。如果这本书能成功地描绘出逻辑学从亚里士多德传统到现代形式系统的演化路径,并在过程中强调那些关键的转折点——比如弗雷格的突破、罗素的悖论以及集合论的危机——那么它就不仅仅是一本参考书,而是一部逻辑思想史的浓缩精华。这样的著作,读完后会让人对整个知识体系产生一种更深刻的敬畏感。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有