圖書標籤: 方法論 政治學 國際關係 博弈論 安全研究 國關理論 比較政治 國際政治
发表于2024-08-22
Rational Choice and Security Studies pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024
Formal theories and rational choice methods have become increasingly prominent in most social sciences in the past few decades. Proponents of formal theoretical approaches argue that these methods are more scientific and sophisticated than other approaches, and that formal methods have already generated significant theoretical progress. As more and more social scientists adopt formal theoretical approaches, critics have argued that these methods are flawed and that they should not become dominant in most social-science disciplines.Rational Choice and Security Studies presents opposing views on the merits of formal rational choice approaches as they have been applied in the subfield of international security studies. This volume includes Stephen Walt's article "Rigor or Rigor Mortis? Rational Choice and Security Studies," critical replies from prominent political scientists, and Walt's rejoinder to his critics.Walt argues that formal approaches have not led to creative new theoretical explanations, that they lack empirical support, and that they have contributed little to the analysis of important contemporary security problems. In their replies, proponents of rational choice approaches emphasize that formal methods are essential for achieving theoretical consistency and precision.
Michael E. Brown is Dean of the Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington University.
Owen Coté is Associate Director of the MIT Security Studies Program and Editor of the journal International Security.
Sean M. Lynn-Jones is Editor of International Security, the International Security Program's quarterly journal. He is also series editor of the Belfer Center Studies in International Security, the Program's book series that is published by MIT Press.
Steven E. Miller is director of the International Security Program at the Belfer Center.
沃爾特本以為可以舌戰群儒,沒想到卻被群毆。沃爾特提齣的幾個點,基本上都很沒道理,唯一比較有利的點是形式理論的經驗研究都很敷衍(部分例外),但學術本來就有分工,有人做實證,有人做經驗,有人兩者都做。
評分看walt被爆菊
評分在Game theory的課上讀過其中的幾章。Stephen Walt最初嚮一群“意識高”的博弈論者們發難,然後被群虐的文集。真是充滿喜感。雖然相較90年代末的政治學研究領域公共選擇對製度論或者定性研究手法的論爭來說,這部文集感覺就格調低瞭那麼一點,不過也算是正常人?能夠看懂的文章。而且,比較有意思的是,理性選擇手法的論爭,多少都是抽象的哲學論戰,和後來計量與定性,實驗與其他手法的技術性論爭有著很大的不一樣。嘛,不過感覺有一些遺憾的自然就是,計量手法在政治學的地位已經近乎完全定著瞭。但是形式模型的理論化?迄今仍舊是眾多理論闡述中的一種而已。
評分沃爾特本以為可以舌戰群儒,沒想到卻被群毆。沃爾特提齣的幾個點,基本上都很沒道理,唯一比較有利的點是形式理論的經驗研究都很敷衍(部分例外),但學術本來就有分工,有人做實證,有人做經驗,有人兩者都做。
評分在Game theory的課上讀過其中的幾章。Stephen Walt最初嚮一群“意識高”的博弈論者們發難,然後被群虐的文集。真是充滿喜感。雖然相較90年代末的政治學研究領域公共選擇對製度論或者定性研究手法的論爭來說,這部文集感覺就格調低瞭那麼一點,不過也算是正常人?能夠看懂的文章。而且,比較有意思的是,理性選擇手法的論爭,多少都是抽象的哲學論戰,和後來計量與定性,實驗與其他手法的技術性論爭有著很大的不一樣。嘛,不過感覺有一些遺憾的自然就是,計量手法在政治學的地位已經近乎完全定著瞭。但是形式模型的理論化?迄今仍舊是眾多理論闡述中的一種而已。
評分
評分
評分
評分
Rational Choice and Security Studies pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024