图书标签: 日本政治 民主政治 比较政治 政党政治 公共政策
发表于2024-11-19
Power Shuffles and Policy Processes pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
The 1990s were a time of political upheaval in Japan. When the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) lost its monopoly on power, which it had held for 38 years, as a result of the House of Representatives election of 1993, Japanese politics entered the coalition era. From 1993 to 1998, the reins of government were held by two types of coalitions: non-LDP coalitions and coalitions that included the LDP and its longtime rival, the Social Democratic Party of Japan (SDP). Although the LDP organized its own government in the early summer of 1998, that year's House of Councillors election returned Japan to the coalition era. The coalition era in the 1990s was also a period of party reorganization. In the fall of 1998, only two parties remained of the nine that had existed in the summer of 1993. This shuffling of power between the LDP and coalition governments affected the policymaking process in general and certain issues in particular. In this book, six political scientists present in-depth analyses of power shuffles and policymaking in Japan in the 1990s. Specific cases of policymaking discussed include administrative reform of quasi-governmental organizations dealing with public finance and business operations; the review of telecommunications policy undertaken in tandem with the consideration of issues concerning the privatization and deregulation of the telecom giant Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation; and the establishment of long-term care insurance (LTCI) for the elderly. Typical of the style followed in the case study chapters, the discussion of LTCI gives background on the issues concerned, examines the relevant political events at each stage of the policy process--agenda-setting, preparation of a draft bill, compromises made, and final outcome--and analyzes how successful the coalition governments were in changing long-established patterns of policymaking. Other chapters present the backdrop to the political events of the 1990s by examining the impact of voter preference on party realignment and policy conflict from the 1970s to the present, and discuss structural reform by the SDPJ and the changes it made in policy when its chairman was named prime minister in 1994. Also considered is the degree of similarity and difference among the policymaking processes of the LDP and the various coalition governments.
Hideo Otake is professor of political science at Kyoto University.
新川,大岳的论文还是可以的~
评分新川,大岳的论文还是可以的~
评分Levithan某期日文版的英译本。最近不是大概也有研究者开始论及连立政权对于反恐和安全保障政策的影响了么?就研究设计而言,的确是不错的想法。90年代之后,日本几乎所有的政权皆为连立政权,自变量有变化,在公共和外交政策的因变量上也有变化。而且,不同政党的选举基础并不一致,他们政策改变之后,在选举上的成败也有得有失,这也是进行研究设计比较好的一面。不过,问题还可以说的更加复杂一些。就日本而言,不同政党在国内政策上的合意度是相较其他民主国家更高一些的。连立政权内部的不同党派,是较难以构成veto player的,这是因为,在政策过程中的合意问题可以转化为国会运营过程中,政策大连立的形成。这也意味着即便连立政权中比例选区所产生的小党,也未必能够坚持自己的极端立场。无论如何,还是有意义的一个论题的
评分Levithan某期日文版的英译本。最近不是大概也有研究者开始论及连立政权对于反恐和安全保障政策的影响了么?就研究设计而言,的确是不错的想法。90年代之后,日本几乎所有的政权皆为连立政权,自变量有变化,在公共和外交政策的因变量上也有变化。而且,不同政党的选举基础并不一致,他们政策改变之后,在选举上的成败也有得有失,这也是进行研究设计比较好的一面。不过,问题还可以说的更加复杂一些。就日本而言,不同政党在国内政策上的合意度是相较其他民主国家更高一些的。连立政权内部的不同党派,是较难以构成veto player的,这是因为,在政策过程中的合意问题可以转化为国会运营过程中,政策大连立的形成。这也意味着即便连立政权中比例选区所产生的小党,也未必能够坚持自己的极端立场。无论如何,还是有意义的一个论题的
评分Levithan某期日文版的英译本。最近不是大概也有研究者开始论及连立政权对于反恐和安全保障政策的影响了么?就研究设计而言,的确是不错的想法。90年代之后,日本几乎所有的政权皆为连立政权,自变量有变化,在公共和外交政策的因变量上也有变化。而且,不同政党的选举基础并不一致,他们政策改变之后,在选举上的成败也有得有失,这也是进行研究设计比较好的一面。不过,问题还可以说的更加复杂一些。就日本而言,不同政党在国内政策上的合意度是相较其他民主国家更高一些的。连立政权内部的不同党派,是较难以构成veto player的,这是因为,在政策过程中的合意问题可以转化为国会运营过程中,政策大连立的形成。这也意味着即便连立政权中比例选区所产生的小党,也未必能够坚持自己的极端立场。无论如何,还是有意义的一个论题的
评分
评分
评分
评分
Power Shuffles and Policy Processes pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024