图书标签: 艺术史 艺术 老师推荐❤ pamela_lee Pamela M. Lee
发表于2024-11-23
Chronophobia pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
In the 1960s art fell out of time; both artists and critics lost their temporal bearings in response to what E. M. Cioran called "not being entitled to time." This anxiety and uneasiness about time, which Pamela Lee calls "chronophobia," cut across movements, media, and genres, and was figured in works ranging from kinetic sculptures to Andy Warhol films. Despite its pervasiveness, the subject of time and 1960s art has gone largely unexamined in historical accounts of the period. Chronophobia is the first critical attempt to define this obsession and analyze it in relation to art and technology. Lee discusses the chronophobia of art relative to the emergence of the Information Age in postwar culture. The accompanying rapid technological transformations, including the advent of computers and automation processes, produced for many an acute sense of historical unknowing; the seemingly accelerated pace of life began to outstrip any attempts to make sense of the present. Lee sees the attitude of 1960s art to time as a historical prelude to our current fixation on time and speed within digital culture. Reflecting upon the 1960s cultural anxiety about temporality, she argues, helps us historicize our current relation to technology and time. After an introductory framing of terms, Lee discusses such topics as "presentness" with repect to the interest in systems theory in 1960s art; kinetic sculpture and new forms of global media; the temporality of the body and the spatialization of the visual image in the paintings of Bridget Riley and the performance art of Carolee Schneemann; Robert Smithson's interest in seriality and futurity, considered in light of his reading of George Kubler's important work The Shape of Time: Remarks on the History of Things and Norbert Wiener's discussion of cybernetics; and the endless belaboring of the present in sixties art, as seen in Warhol's Empire and the work of On Kawara.
Pamela M. Lee is Associate Professor of Art and Art History at Stanford University. She is the author of Object to be Destroyed: The Work of Gordon Matta-Clark (MIT Press, 1999)
一开始不喜欢这样的写作风格来写史。但是习惯了倒觉得,我也能这样写啊。虽然有一章跟我兴趣关系不大的没读但是暂且也不会读了。所以先算看完了吧。(首页友邻能否看到这种标记广播啊啊啊啊看到了吱一声啊啊啊啊憋死我了!!!
评分非常theoretical。Lee的方法很有意思。研究艺术和艺术的技术环境。这对于六十年代的艺术是再适合不过的了。艺术与技术之间的关系也是Lee所有作品的核心问题。Lee从自己的角度读了很多经典的艺术史文献。这点其实很值得学。读懂文献当然重要,但是如果没有自己的角度,文献是没有办法变成论文的。其实任何一种好的切入角度都是寄生。Lee对于Kubler的解读很不错,但是我觉得她过分强调K对于生物比喻的批评了。毕竟Cybernetics本身就是一种生物比喻,不论是Kubler还是Wiener都是逃不开的。这种解读的后果是环境的透明化。而且K其实并没有抛弃生物比喻,L忽略了他对“变异 (mutant)”这个生物比喻的讨论。
评分非常theoretical。Lee的方法很有意思。研究艺术和艺术的技术环境。这对于六十年代的艺术是再适合不过的了。艺术与技术之间的关系也是Lee所有作品的核心问题。Lee从自己的角度读了很多经典的艺术史文献。这点其实很值得学。读懂文献当然重要,但是如果没有自己的角度,文献是没有办法变成论文的。其实任何一种好的切入角度都是寄生。Lee对于Kubler的解读很不错,但是我觉得她过分强调K对于生物比喻的批评了。毕竟Cybernetics本身就是一种生物比喻,不论是Kubler还是Wiener都是逃不开的。这种解读的后果是环境的透明化。而且K其实并没有抛弃生物比喻,L忽略了他对“变异 (mutant)”这个生物比喻的讨论。
评分非常theoretical。Lee的方法很有意思。研究艺术和艺术的技术环境。这对于六十年代的艺术是再适合不过的了。艺术与技术之间的关系也是Lee所有作品的核心问题。Lee从自己的角度读了很多经典的艺术史文献。这点其实很值得学。读懂文献当然重要,但是如果没有自己的角度,文献是没有办法变成论文的。其实任何一种好的切入角度都是寄生。Lee对于Kubler的解读很不错,但是我觉得她过分强调K对于生物比喻的批评了。毕竟Cybernetics本身就是一种生物比喻,不论是Kubler还是Wiener都是逃不开的。这种解读的后果是环境的透明化。而且K其实并没有抛弃生物比喻,L忽略了他对“变异 (mutant)”这个生物比喻的讨论。
评分非常theoretical。Lee的方法很有意思。研究艺术和艺术的技术环境。这对于六十年代的艺术是再适合不过的了。艺术与技术之间的关系也是Lee所有作品的核心问题。Lee从自己的角度读了很多经典的艺术史文献。这点其实很值得学。读懂文献当然重要,但是如果没有自己的角度,文献是没有办法变成论文的。其实任何一种好的切入角度都是寄生。Lee对于Kubler的解读很不错,但是我觉得她过分强调K对于生物比喻的批评了。毕竟Cybernetics本身就是一种生物比喻,不论是Kubler还是Wiener都是逃不开的。这种解读的后果是环境的透明化。而且K其实并没有抛弃生物比喻,L忽略了他对“变异 (mutant)”这个生物比喻的讨论。
评分
评分
评分
评分
Chronophobia pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024