The first book to bring together these interviews of master moviemakers from the American Film Institute’s renowned seminars—a series that has been in existence for almost forty years, since the founding of the Institute itself.
Here are the legendary directors, producers, cinematographers and writers—the great pioneers, the great artists—whose work led the way in the early days of moviemaking and still survives from what was the twentieth century’s art form. The book is edited—with commentaries—by George Stevens, Jr., founder of the American Film Institute and the AFI Center for Advanced Film Studies’ Harold Lloyd Master Seminar series.
Here talking about their work, their art—picture making in general—are directors from King Vidor, Howard Hawks and Fritz Lang (“I learned only from bad films”) to William Wyler, George Stevens and David Lean.
Here, too, is Hal Wallis, one of Hollywood’s great motion picture producers; legendary cinematographers Stanley Cortez, who shot, among other pictures, The Magnificent Ambersons, Since You Went Away and Shock Corridor and George Folsey, who was the cameraman on more than 150 pictures, from Animal Crackers and Marie Antoinette to Meet Me in St. Louis and Adam’s Rib; and the equally celebrated James Wong Howe.
Here is the screenwriter Ray Bradbury, who wrote the script for John Huston’s Moby Dick, Fahrenheit 451 and The Illustrated Man, and the admired Ernest Lehman, who wrote the screenplays for Sabrina, Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf and North by Northwest (“One day Hitchcock said, ‘I’ve always wanted to do a chase across the face of Mount Rushmore.’”).
And here, too, are Ingmar Bergman and Federico Fellini (“Making a movie is a mathematical operation. It’s absolutely impossible to improvise”).
These conversations gathered together—and published for the first time—are full of wisdom, movie history and ideas about picture making, about working with actors, about how to tell a story in words and movement.
A sample of what the moviemakers have to teach us:
Elia Kazan, on translating a play to the screen: “With A Streetcar Named Desire we worked hard to open it up and then went back to the play because we’d lost all the compression. In the play, these people were trapped in a room with each other. As the story progressed I took out little flats, and the set got smaller and smaller.”
Ingmar Bergman on writing: “For half a year I had a picture inside my head of three women walking around in a red room with white clothes. I couldn’t understand why these damned women were there. I tried to throw it away . . . find out what they said to each other because they whispered. It came out that they were watching another woman dying. Then the screenplay started—but it took about a year. The script always starts with a picture . . . ”
Jean Renoir on actors: “The truth is, if you discourage an actor you may never find him again. An actor is an animal, extremely fragile. You get a little expression, it is not exactly what you wanted, but it’s alive. It’s something human.”
And Hitchcock—on Hitchcock: “Give [the audience] pleasure, the same pleasure they have when they wake up from a nightmare.”
George Stevens, Jr., is a writer, director, producer, and founder of the American Film Institute. He is the author of the acclaimed play Thurgood, which ran on Broadway and was filmed for HBO. In 2013 he received an Honorary Academy Award from the Motion Picture Academy. He has received fifteen Emmys, two Peabody Awards, the Humanitas Prize, and eight Writers Guild Awards for his productions, including the annual Kennedy Center Honors, Separate but Equal, The Murder of Mary Phagan, and We Are One: The Obama Inaugural Celebration at the Lincoln Memorial. His production The Thin Red Line was nominated for seven Academy Awards, including Best Picture. In 2009 President Obama named him co-chairman of the President’s Committee on the Arts and Humanities. Stevens started out working with his father, George Stevens, on Shane, Giant, and The Diary of Anne Frank and in 1962 was named head of the United States Information Agency’s motion picture division by Edward R. Murrow. He lives in Washington, D.C.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这部作品简直是电影爱好者的圣经!我花了整整一个周末沉浸其中,感觉自己仿佛真的坐在那些传奇导演和制片人身边,偷听他们的创作秘辛和人生哲学。最让我震撼的是,作者并非简单地罗列访谈录,而是巧妙地将不同的时代背景、技术革新与个人的艺术抉择编织在一起,形成了一幅关于好莱坞黄金时代全景式的历史画卷。书中对光影处理、叙事节奏的探讨,那种细致入微的剖析,不是科班出身的门外汉能轻易写出来的。我尤其喜欢其中关于默片向有声片过渡时期,那些老一辈电影人如何挣扎、如何适应新媒介的段落。他们的坦诚让人动容,没有美化,只有对艺术近乎偏执的热爱和面对商业残酷的清醒认知。它不仅仅是回顾,更像是一次深刻的行业生态考察,让我对那个时代电影工业的复杂性有了全新的认识。读完之后,我立刻重温了某几部经典老片,这一次的观看体验完全不同,每一个镜头背后似乎都有了对话者的声音在低语。
评分这本书的装帧和排版也令人赞叹,看得出出版方在尊重历史的同时,也力求提供最佳的阅读体验。纸张的质感,字体大小的排布,都非常考究,使得长时间阅读也不会感到疲惫。更重要的是,作者在整理这些珍贵访谈时,显然做足了功课,他总能在受访者的发言中提供恰当的背景注释或引用其他资料佐证,这极大地帮助了像我这样对特定时期了解不够深入的读者。整个阅读过程仿佛进行了一场高质量的学术研讨会,但少了高高在上的姿态,多了一份亲近感。我特别喜欢那些关于剧本改编过程的章节,里面揭示了早期编剧和导演之间那种既合作又竞争的复杂关系,这比任何虚构的行业剧都要来得真实和引人入胜。它让我意识到,黄金时代的伟大,绝不仅仅是几个天才的横空出世,而是一个精妙运作的生态系统共同作用的结果。
评分对于长期关注电影史的人来说,这本书提供了一个难得的、多维度的视角。它不是教科书式的梳理,而是一系列充满生命力的“个体见证”。让我印象深刻的是,不同代际的电影人对于“好莱坞精神”的定义竟然存在着显著的差异。那些早期开拓者强调的是冒险和不确定性,而后来者则更多地关注工匠精神和流程优化。这种代际间的张力,通过作者精准的引导,被挖掘得十分到位。阅读过程中,我反复停下来做笔记,不仅仅是为了记住某些技术术语,更是为了捕捉那些关于“创作动机”的阐述。作者似乎对人性的弱点和光辉都抱有一种温和的理解,使得即便是那些在历史上有些争议的人物,在他们的叙述中也显得立体而饱满。这本书的价值在于,它没有给出标准答案,而是提供了一场场精彩的、关于“如何成为一个电影人”的深度思辨。
评分我必须承认,这本书的某些部分需要读者具备一定的电影知识储备才能完全领会其精髓,但即便如此,它依然散发着强大的魅力。作者的叙述语言非常克制和精准,不煽情,不夸大,专注于呈现受访者思想的“原貌”。我感受到了一种强烈的“时间感”,那些访谈中的细节,比如对特定摄影机型号的偏爱,对某种剪辑手法的坚持,都将读者一下子拉回了那个胶片飞转的年代。其中关于“艺术完整性”与“制片厂制度”之间永恒博弈的探讨,尤其发人深省。它迫使我们思考,今天的电影制作环境,我们是否正面临着相似的,或者说升级了的困境?这本书的意义已经超越了怀旧,它提供了一份珍贵的历史参照系,让我们能更清晰地审视当下电影工业的脉络走向。读罢掩卷,我感到的是一种充实的满足感,仿佛脑海中架起了一座通往旧日好莱坞的坚实桥梁。
评分说实话,一开始我有点担心这种“访谈录合集”会显得松散和缺乏主题,但事实证明我的顾虑完全是多余的。作者的功力在于其提问的深度和角度,他总能精准地切入那些最核心、最能激发受访者思考的那些问题。有些对话的火花简直是迸射出来的,能看出访谈对象之间观点的碰撞与融合。比如,有一位导演谈到他对“明星制度”的看法,那种既依赖又警惕的复杂情感,被描绘得淋漓尽致。这本书的行文节奏把握得非常到位,张弛有度,严肃的理论探讨之后,总会穿插一些充满烟火气的幕后轶事,比如拍摄现场的小插曲、制片厂之间的微妙竞争,这些细节极大地增强了阅读的趣味性和代入感。我特别欣赏其中关于技术与艺术平衡的讨论,它揭示了创新往往伴随着巨大的风险和保守势力的阻挠,这种对行业内部权力动态的描摹,远比单纯的技术史要精彩得多。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有