Richard O. Prum is William Robertson Coe Professor of Ornithology at Yale University, and Head Curator of Vertebrate Zoology at the Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History. He has conducted field work throughout the world, and has studied fossil theropod dinosaurs in China. He received a MacArthur Fellowship in 2010.
A major reimagining of how evolutionary forces work, revealing how mating preferences—what Darwin termed “the taste for the beautiful”—create the extraordinary range of ornament in the animal world.
In the great halls of science, dogma holds that Darwin’s theory of natural selection explains every branch on the tree of life: which species thrive, which wither away to extinction, and what features each evolves. But can adaptation by natural selection really account for everything we see in nature?
Yale University ornithologist Richard Prum—reviving Darwin’s own views—thinks not. Deep in tropical jungles around the world are birds with a dizzying array of appearances and mating displays: Club-winged Manakins who sing with their wings, Great Argus Pheasants who dazzle prospective mates with a four-foot-wide cone of feathers covered in golden 3D spheres, Red-capped Manakins who moonwalk. In thirty years of fieldwork, Prum has seen numerous display traits that seem disconnected from, if not outright contrary to, selection for individual survival. To explain this, he dusts off Darwin’s long-neglected theory of sexual selection in which the act of choosing a mate for purely aesthetic reasons—for the mere pleasure of it—is an independent engine of evolutionary change.
Mate choice can drive ornamental traits from the constraints of adaptive evolution, allowing them to grow ever more elaborate. It also sets the stakes for sexual conflict, in which the sexual autonomy of the female evolves in response to male sexual control. Most crucially, this framework provides important insights into the evolution of human sexuality, particularly the ways in which female preferences have changed male bodies, and even maleness itself, through evolutionary time.
The Evolution of Beauty presents a unique scientific vision for how nature’s splendor contributes to a more complete understanding of evolution and of ourselves.
11/03/2017 最近看到有人提起,就贴过来吧。 刚听这本书时候的一点小片段。其实后面的内容不止这些,蛮有趣的。 昨天煮饭时听到一段关于duck sex的内容,差点笑喷了,很有意思也很有意义,所以要记一下。 前面都在讲鸟儿们的迁徙特性、羽毛和歌声,narrator还时不时学学鸟叫。...
評分一 关于阅读本书的乐趣和价值 这本书的阅读是非常有趣的,无论是大道理还是小事例,都不断激发着我的脑电波。我以为很多社会风潮、流行言论、社会现象,都可以在这本书中,从非人动物那里找到相似、甚至一模一样的现象,于是接下来是欣慰还是惊醒就看个人的悟性了。这种跨物种...
評分 評分《美的进化》 这本非常美的书,不仅颜值高而且很有颠覆性。 我其实读了蛮久,前半部分讲鸟,后半部分讲人,因为对鸟不是很了解,想象力也不够丰富,就在网上找了很多鸟的图片和视频,作者是鸟类学家、生态学家,对鸟是真爱,我觉得这种喜欢动物的人还是有很多相似点,比如达尔...
孤陋寡聞如我,直到聽瞭這本書纔知道進化學裏adaptationist和pluralist之爭,順藤摸瓜去看,原來還是此領域最為火熱的學派爭論之一,而這本書的作者,是反對adaptationism的。這本書的中心議題是性選擇(sexual selection),與傳統適應主義相比,性選擇並不認為後代的健康和生育能力是唯一的選擇標杆與進化動力,相反,它認為物種在選擇配偶上的主觀傾嚮起到很大的作用。有時候這類傾嚮僅建立在審美之上,而且像所有主觀傾嚮一樣,有時候閤理(帶來更健康和有生育力),有時並不。有時某一種trait最開始受到青睞的時候也許帶有閤理性,但後來則在軍備競賽般的誇大中丟掉瞭最初的閤理性——文中用08年房貸泡沫來比擬非常形象。總之是一本很有意思的書,可是不知道有沒有時間具體寫書評。
评分又囉嗦又不嚴謹,看瞭兩章放棄瞭
评分最後兩章不行,私貨過多。
评分這本書從很多方麵來說都和from bacteria to Bach and back很像。並非所有的trait都是自然選擇,有性選擇也有社會選擇也發揮瞭作用。有些trait留下來並非好到適者生存,而是沒有壞到不適生存。性選擇主要的驅動力是女性自主權。按照Dennett的說法也許是competence without comprehension。但是讀完後依舊會覺得有些理論證據是對方理論的不足之處,但沒有自己的證明證據。我讀這本書的時候很開心,但對從生物學裏麵moralizing始終感到矛盾。
评分有一些很有批判性的創見,但私貨也不少,關鍵是說服力欠佳。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有