Richard O. Prum is William Robertson Coe Professor of Ornithology at Yale University, and Head Curator of Vertebrate Zoology at the Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History. He has conducted field work throughout the world, and has studied fossil theropod dinosaurs in China. He received a MacArthur Fellowship in 2010.
A major reimagining of how evolutionary forces work, revealing how mating preferences—what Darwin termed “the taste for the beautiful”—create the extraordinary range of ornament in the animal world.
In the great halls of science, dogma holds that Darwin’s theory of natural selection explains every branch on the tree of life: which species thrive, which wither away to extinction, and what features each evolves. But can adaptation by natural selection really account for everything we see in nature?
Yale University ornithologist Richard Prum—reviving Darwin’s own views—thinks not. Deep in tropical jungles around the world are birds with a dizzying array of appearances and mating displays: Club-winged Manakins who sing with their wings, Great Argus Pheasants who dazzle prospective mates with a four-foot-wide cone of feathers covered in golden 3D spheres, Red-capped Manakins who moonwalk. In thirty years of fieldwork, Prum has seen numerous display traits that seem disconnected from, if not outright contrary to, selection for individual survival. To explain this, he dusts off Darwin’s long-neglected theory of sexual selection in which the act of choosing a mate for purely aesthetic reasons—for the mere pleasure of it—is an independent engine of evolutionary change.
Mate choice can drive ornamental traits from the constraints of adaptive evolution, allowing them to grow ever more elaborate. It also sets the stakes for sexual conflict, in which the sexual autonomy of the female evolves in response to male sexual control. Most crucially, this framework provides important insights into the evolution of human sexuality, particularly the ways in which female preferences have changed male bodies, and even maleness itself, through evolutionary time.
The Evolution of Beauty presents a unique scientific vision for how nature’s splendor contributes to a more complete understanding of evolution and of ourselves.
从鸟类的进化史,看见人类进化的节奏,深入浅出很适合周末阅读。 所以说男生真的要越来越温柔了吗!想想还有点小期待, 强烈推荐这本书,教你从鸟类的进化看到未来,看懂审美up的小趋势。 备注: 封面也太好看了吧!!!周末忍不住带去故宫疯狂合照,可惜人太多了疯狂避人来着...
评分 评分The Evolution of Beauty 英文版刚刚上市时,我就在不少国外科普媒体上注意到了它。当时我还算半个“自由撰稿人”(说的太好听了,实际上就是四处给别人码点儿字写科普),对自然博物类科普的话题一直很感兴趣。这本书一经出版便受到了学界与科普界的高度关注,随之而来的则是...
评分11/03/2017 最近看到有人提起,就贴过来吧。 刚听这本书时候的一点小片段。其实后面的内容不止这些,蛮有趣的。 昨天煮饭时听到一段关于duck sex的内容,差点笑喷了,很有意思也很有意义,所以要记一下。 前面都在讲鸟儿们的迁徙特性、羽毛和歌声,narrator还时不时学学鸟叫。...
评分2015年11月某天的傍晚,一位德国鸟类学者望着灯火辉煌,船来车往的外滩,发出了”痛心疾首“的感慨:想想我们人类浪费了多少资源在没有实用价值的东西上!我当时毫不犹豫地反驳:可是动物也是一样啊,想想有些鸟的羽毛。他听罢一笑算是接受了上海的“骄奢”。 而这本书的个例部...
作者说鸟类世界许多现象无法被适者生存解释,而被雌性的择偶和审美追求影响,像孔雀开屏园丁鸟搭凉亭。最后几章延伸到人类社会,用女性的性选择来解释为什么人类没有阴茎骨,男性同性恋比例比女性高。被选择的男性并不是被动的,所以野鸭会使用性暴力。书很有趣,只是很难想象这个女性选择的机制竟会让女性演化成弱势群体。关于这一点,作者只提了一句,农业革命给了男性物质上的优势。
评分这本书的潜台词真的很妙:一方面为自由意志辩护,另一方面又模糊了人和动物的界限。真的是让人很为难啊。作者显然对鸟比对人了解,关于鸟类的前几章非常引人入胜,一写到人类就有点露怯了。
评分又啰嗦又不严谨,看了两章放弃了
评分我们所学的进化论很大程度上是华莱士的群体自然选择进化论,而达尔文的进化论更广泛,包括了美学,个体选择和自然选择等。现代科学对于美学有两个观点:统计大神Fisher的female choice和good genes(例如不利条件原则),作者更倾向于Fisher。最喜欢的作者的观点是:falling love is not game theory. Coevolution of aesthetic adaption and female choice have made it a deeply aesthetic experience that involves mutual social, cognitive, and physical seduction. 后几章关于女权和LGB也很有趣。
评分非常好看!颠覆了我对演化论的认知。从鸟类谈到人类,并为现在方兴未艾的女权主义与LGBT平权运动提供了理论支援(虽然后几章脑洞略大...).不愧是同时入选《纽约时报》与《华尔街日报》2017年度书单的著作。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有