In 1931, the young Kurt Godel published his First Incompleteness Theorem, which tells us that, for any sufficiently rich theory of arithmetic, there are some arithmetical truths the theory cannot prove. This remarkable result is among the most intriguing (and most misunderstood) in logic. Godel also outlined an equally significant Second Incompleteness Theorem. How are these Theorems established, and why do they matter? Peter Smith answers these questions by presenting an unusual variety of proofs for the First Theorem, showing how to prove the Second Theorem, and exploring a family of related results (including some not easily available elsewhere). The formal explanations are interwoven with discussions of the wider significance of the two Theorems. This book will be accessible to philosophy students with a limited formal background. It is equally suitable for mathematics students taking a first course in mathematical logic.
评分
评分
评分
评分
缺点是废话太多,啰嗦。
评分缺点是废话太多,啰嗦。
评分突然想起来我还读过这本书。真的十分啰嗦(哲学家式的啰嗦),当时让我头都晕了还没搞明白哥德尔不完全性定理的证明。建议学数学的同学直接读严肃的哥德尔不完全性定理的证明,除非你想锻炼英语可以读这本。
评分缺点是废话太多,啰嗦。
评分it does a better job in illustrating the point, but Smullyan's book plays with it
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有