Tony Hope 牛津大学医学伦理学教授,精神科名誉顾问医师,牛津大学医疗伦理和沟通中心的创立者。与人合著有《牛津临床医学手册》和《掌控你的心灵》。
Issues in medical ethics are rarely out of the media and it is an area of ethics that has particular interest for the general public as well as the medical practitioner. This short and accessible introduction provides an invaluable tool with which to think about the ethical values that lie at the heart of medicine. Tony Hope deals with the thorny moral questions such as euthanasia and the morality of killing, and also explores political questions such as: how should health care resources be distributed fairly? Each chapter in this book considers a different issue: genetics, modern reproductive technologies, resource allocation, mental health, medical research, and discusses controversial questions such as: * Who should have access to reproductive technology? Who should pay? * Is it right to fund expensive drug treatment for individuals? * Should active euthanasia be legalized? * Should treatment for mental illness be imposed on patients without their consent? * Who should have access to information from genetic testing? * Should we require consent for the use of dead bodies or organs in medical research?
文/吴情 在多数人的印象中,科学关注“真”,是一门追求客观真理的学问,与伦理道德无关;宗教、伦理关注“善”,而与客观真理无涉;因信称义,信服就好。然而,随着现代医学的发展,科学,至少是科学活动,或多或少“逾越”了原先被目为宗教、伦理的领域,比如基因工...
评分这是一部闪闪发光的作品,通篇满溢着理性与逻辑的光芒!牛津通识读本系列,真的是越读越有惊喜啊,赞美!一个月前成都回深圳的航班上开始读的,这次再次从深圳去成都的航班上读完。恰好也是去推进一个医学相关的项目,最早是在kindle上翻到以前保存的电子书,本来是想随手翻看...
评分翻开这本书最有趣的第一个地方便是关于这书的作者和这书作序者的介绍,Tony Hope这个在这个领域相当有成就的人,居然还是只跟人合著了两本书,而作序者只是中国有影响力的人,便写了二十余本书,不能不说这从中能看出两种学术体系本质的不同。一个追求学问和真理,一个追求名声...
评分对于不存在的人以及精神错乱者的思考,是我以前从来没想到的,让人感到灵光一闪的。每次总是佩服这些人细致精准严密的逻辑思维! 其实任何领域的伦理学都是值得深究的一门学问,只是不应该直接告诉你答案和应该怎么样,而是要让人自己思考自己给自己答案。现在中国社会那么多无...
评分对于不存在的人以及精神错乱者的思考,是我以前从来没想到的,让人感到灵光一闪的。每次总是佩服这些人细致精准严密的逻辑思维! 其实任何领域的伦理学都是值得深究的一门学问,只是不应该直接告诉你答案和应该怎么样,而是要让人自己思考自己给自己答案。现在中国社会那么多无...
As a member of society, I totally agree with the best interest+volunteer rule. But as a natural human being, I prefer to decide when, how and why to die by myself, no matter it's active or passive. Writing has no problem. Logic is grounded and honest. But Ethics is all about trapping yrself and just boring...
评分phylosophy world is so profound and sophisticated~
评分狐狸式的写作和论证 这本书最大的价值是提供了诸多医学伦理的素材 以及部分逻辑工具。
评分As a member of society, I totally agree with the best interest+volunteer rule. But as a natural human being, I prefer to decide when, how and why to die by myself, no matter it's active or passive. Writing has no problem. Logic is grounded and honest. But Ethics is all about trapping yrself and just boring...
评分Major gain: genetic information challenges the individualistic nature of many of the moral assumptions made in discussions of medical ethics. The book is well-organized but personally I feel that some counterarguments are not very strong.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有