圖書標籤: Viktor_Shklovsky  Theory  yann  Z  MRes  LiteraryStudies   

喜歡 Russian Formalist Criticism 的讀者還喜歡

中間跳瞭，一如既往地被老毛子驚到

中間跳瞭，一如既往地被老毛子驚到

中間跳瞭，一如既往地被老毛子驚到

中間跳瞭，一如既往地被老毛子驚到

中間跳瞭，一如既往地被老毛子驚到

There are four essays in this book. The first one by Shklovsky seems a better translation than that in Theory of Prose. Art as Technique It seems not hard to summarize Shklovsky’s major proposition in “Art as Technique”, that is, when perception becom...

There are four essays in this book. The first one by Shklovsky seems a better translation than that in Theory of Prose. Art as Technique It seems not hard to summarize Shklovsky’s major proposition in “Art as Technique”, that is, when perception becom...

There are four essays in this book. The first one by Shklovsky seems a better translation than that in Theory of Prose. Art as Technique It seems not hard to summarize Shklovsky’s major proposition in “Art as Technique”, that is, when perception becom...

There are four essays in this book. The first one by Shklovsky seems a better translation than that in Theory of Prose. Art as Technique It seems not hard to summarize Shklovsky’s major proposition in “Art as Technique”, that is, when perception becom...

There are four essays in this book. The first one by Shklovsky seems a better translation than that in Theory of Prose. Art as Technique It seems not hard to summarize Shklovsky’s major proposition in “Art as Technique”, that is, when perception becom...