图书标签: Viktor_Shklovsky  Theory  yann  Z  MRes  LiteraryStudies   

喜欢 Russian Formalist Criticism 的读者还喜欢

中间跳了，一如既往地被老毛子惊到

中间跳了，一如既往地被老毛子惊到

中间跳了，一如既往地被老毛子惊到

中间跳了，一如既往地被老毛子惊到

中间跳了，一如既往地被老毛子惊到

There are four essays in this book. The first one by Shklovsky seems a better translation than that in Theory of Prose. Art as Technique It seems not hard to summarize Shklovsky’s major proposition in “Art as Technique”, that is, when perception becom...

There are four essays in this book. The first one by Shklovsky seems a better translation than that in Theory of Prose. Art as Technique It seems not hard to summarize Shklovsky’s major proposition in “Art as Technique”, that is, when perception becom...

There are four essays in this book. The first one by Shklovsky seems a better translation than that in Theory of Prose. Art as Technique It seems not hard to summarize Shklovsky’s major proposition in “Art as Technique”, that is, when perception becom...

There are four essays in this book. The first one by Shklovsky seems a better translation than that in Theory of Prose. Art as Technique It seems not hard to summarize Shklovsky’s major proposition in “Art as Technique”, that is, when perception becom...

There are four essays in this book. The first one by Shklovsky seems a better translation than that in Theory of Prose. Art as Technique It seems not hard to summarize Shklovsky’s major proposition in “Art as Technique”, that is, when perception becom...