圖書標籤: 政治學 state 社會學 比較政治 politics 國傢主義範式 政治 政治社會學
发表于2024-11-22
Bringing the State Back In pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024
Product Description
Until recently, dominant theoretical paradigms in the comparative social sciences did not highlight states as organizational structures or as potentially autonomous actors. Indeed, the term 'state' was rarely used. Current work, however, increasingly views the state as an agent which, although influenced by the society that surrounds it, also shapes social and political processes. The contributors to this volume, which includes some of the best recent interdisciplinary scholarship on states in relation to social structures, make use of theoretically engaged comparative and historical investigations to provide improved conceptualizations of states and how they operate. Each of the book's major parts presents a related set of analytical issues about modern states, which are explored in the context of a wide range of times and places, both contemporary and historical, and in developing and advanced-industrial nations. The first part examines state strategies in newly developing countries. The second part analyzes war making and state making in early modern Europe, and discusses states in relation to the post-World War II international economy. The third part pursues new insights into how states influence political cleavages and collective action. In the final chapter, the editors bring together the questions raised by the contributors and suggest tentative conclusions that emerge from an overview of all the articles. As a programmatic work that proposes new directions for the analysis of modern states, the volume will appeal to a wide range of teachers and students of political science, political economy, sociology, history, and anthropology.
Peter Evans is best known for his work on the comparative political economy of national development, exemplified by his 1995 book Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation and a recent series of articles on the “21st Century Developmental State.” For the past several years he has been researching the ways in which social movements can mobilize transnationally to build a “counter-hegemonic globalization.” Among these movements, the global labor movement is a key actor. See his 2008 article, “Is an Alternative Globalization Possible?” and his 2010 article “Is it Labor’s Turn to Globalize?”
Theda Skocpol (PhD, Harvard, 1975) is the Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at Harvard University. At Harvard, she has served as Dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (2005-2007) and as Director of the Center for American Political Studies (2000-2006). In 1996, Skocpol served as President of the Social Science History Association, an interdisciplinary professional group, and in 2002-03, she served as President of the American Political Science Association during the centennial of this leading professional body. In 2007, she was awarded the Johan Skytte Prize in Political Science for her "visionary analysis of the significance of the state for revolutions, welfare, and political trust, pursued with theoretical depth and empirical evidence." The Skytte Prize is one of the largest and most prestigious in political science and is awarded annually by the Skytte Foundation at Uppsala University (Sweden) to the scholar who in the view of the foundation has made the most valuable contribution to the discipline. Skocpol has also been elected to membership in all three major U.S. interdisciplinary honor societies: the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (elected 1994), the American Philosophical Society (elected 2006), and the National Academy of Sciences (elected 2008).
Dietrich Rueschemeyer is professor emeritus of sociology and Charles C. Tillinghast Jr. '32 Professor emeritus of International Studies. He currently works on state formation and historical antecedents of socioeconomic development.He was one of the founders of Brown's Center for the Comparative Study of Development, which merged into the Watson Institute. From 1997 to 2002, Professor Rueschemeyer led the Institute's Political Economy and Development Program.His books include Usable Theory: Analytic Tools for Social and Political Research (Princeton University Press, forthcoming in 2009); Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (Cambribge University Press, 2003, co-edited with J. Mahoney); Participation and Democracy East and West: Comparisons and Interpretations (M. E. Sharpe, 1998, co-edited with M. Rueschemeyer and B. Wittrock); States, Social Knowledge, and the Origins of Modern Social Policies (Princeton University Press, 1996, co-edited with Th. Skocpol); Capitalist Development and Democracy (University of Chicago Press, 1992, co-authored with E. H. Stephens and J. D. Stephen); Power and the Division of Labour (Stanford University Press, 1986); and Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge University Press, 1985, co-edited with P.B. Evans and Th. Skocpol).
關於經濟的部分就以後再看吧不著急。Tilly那篇不用說。第三部分的三篇都很有意思,尤其Stepan關於BA政體和civil society的相互作用的論述很有啓發,state為瞭維係legitimacy需要both offensive and defensive projects,前者失靈的時候就靠製造恐慌來維持國民的依賴;而兩個都失靈之後的某個時刻軍政府的軍隊部分和政府部分産生分裂政權就崩盤瞭。然而把state與society完全割裂開的分析方法在後來被很多人批判過,因為交互太多無法找到一個確切的界限。用Stepan的例子來說,巴西的商界受到state影響多少受到civil society影響又有多少,智利的state enterprise屬於state還是society呢?
評分“找迴國傢”可能有點言過其實,但絲毫不影響所選文章的價值。大佬們在文集裏主要討論瞭兩個問題:如何在比較研究中考慮各國獨特的曆史因素;如何在國傢-社會、政治-經濟的互動中動態地、相對地分析國傢能力。前者開啓瞭曆史製度主義和多樣化資本主義的潮流,後者催生瞭對國傢能力的再概念化和新框架的誕生。重點讀瞭Tilly, Katzestein, Katznelson和Stepan的文章,後三篇都堪稱splitter式研究的範文。也許讀完還是對“what is the state”一臉懵逼,但所選文章對曆史-比較、理論-實證、一般框架-個案細節這幾對關係的分析和呈現方式,讓本書成為比較研究或許最好的handbook之一。 #比較研究真有趣# #疫情期間的日常不務正業
評分學界弄潮産物,有理論意識的重要篇章後來發展成專著或匯編書。嚴格地說國傢或對國傢的意識在社科研究中從沒缺位過,說“帶迴國傢”口氣甚大,其實是以結構(功能)視角突齣國傢作為單一變量的重要作用。理論篇章整閤前代理論,凸顯國傢為有自主能力、具體形構、與社會有具體邊界,中世紀以來功能分化興起處理權威分配、壟斷軍事資源、有龐大官僚層級的組織,並形塑階級、社團、公民社會、政黨等政治行動者的行動規則和環境,但經驗研究操作上又將國傢打散為不同部門、不同精英、不同機關(行政立法司法等),其不同組織架構與功能與社會各團體産生不同聯係,在具體議題上呈現各國不同做法。此兩者的微妙內在張力似顯示,國傢其實一直在社會中,或者國傢社會兩者根本是功能結構分化而已,邊界是動態的,隻是某些情境下國傢部門作用特彆明顯可見而已。
評分我發現自己實在很記掛skocpol,就快要演變為2個凡是瞭。。。
評分State is a set of political institutions.
这本书给了我很大的震撼,虽然这本书在1985年就已经面世,但它所提出的许多观点在二十一世纪的今天读来仍未觉得过时,文章对许多问题的探讨都百家云集,这就是我们现在常说的“神仙打架”吧。 这本书的很多内容采取了分析归纳法和历史比较来研究国家,试图使人们更加了解国家的...
評分这本书给了我很大的震撼,虽然这本书在1985年就已经面世,但它所提出的许多观点在二十一世纪的今天读来仍未觉得过时,文章对许多问题的探讨都百家云集,这就是我们现在常说的“神仙打架”吧。 这本书的很多内容采取了分析归纳法和历史比较来研究国家,试图使人们更加了解国家的...
評分这本书给了我很大的震撼,虽然这本书在1985年就已经面世,但它所提出的许多观点在二十一世纪的今天读来仍未觉得过时,文章对许多问题的探讨都百家云集,这就是我们现在常说的“神仙打架”吧。 这本书的很多内容采取了分析归纳法和历史比较来研究国家,试图使人们更加了解国家的...
評分这本书给了我很大的震撼,虽然这本书在1985年就已经面世,但它所提出的许多观点在二十一世纪的今天读来仍未觉得过时,文章对许多问题的探讨都百家云集,这就是我们现在常说的“神仙打架”吧。 这本书的很多内容采取了分析归纳法和历史比较来研究国家,试图使人们更加了解国家的...
評分这本书给了我很大的震撼,虽然这本书在1985年就已经面世,但它所提出的许多观点在二十一世纪的今天读来仍未觉得过时,文章对许多问题的探讨都百家云集,这就是我们现在常说的“神仙打架”吧。 这本书的很多内容采取了分析归纳法和历史比较来研究国家,试图使人们更加了解国家的...
Bringing the State Back In pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024