Yevgeny Ivanovich Zamyatin[1] (Russian: Евге́ний Ива́нович Замя́тин, 20 January (Julian) / 1 February (Gregorian), 1884 – 10 March 1937), sometimes anglicized as Eugene Zamyatin, was a Russian author of science fiction and political satire. He is most famous for his 1921 novel We, a story set in a dystopian future police state. Despite having been a prominent Old Bolshevik, Zamyatin was deeply disturbed by the policies pursued by the CPSU following the October Revolution. In 1921, We became the first work banned by the Soviet censorship board. Ultimately, Zamyatin arranged for We to be smuggled to the West for publication. The subsequent outrage this sparked within the Party and the Union of Soviet Writers led directly to Zamyatin's successful request for exile from his homeland. Due to his use of literature to criticize Soviet society, Zamyatin has been referred to as one of the first Soviet dissidents.
First published in the Soviet 1920s, Zamyatin's dystopic novel left an indelible watermark on 20th-century culture, from Orwell's 1984 to Terry Gilliam's movie Brazil. Randall's exciting new translation strips away the Cold War connotations and makes us conscious of Zamyatin's other influences, from Dostoyevski to German expressionism. D-503 is a loyal "cipher" of the totalitarian One State, literally walled in by glass; he is a mathematician happily building the world's first rocket, but his life is changed by meeting I-330, a woman with "sharp teeth" who keeps emerging out of a sudden vampirish dusk to smile wickedly on the poor narrator and drive him wild with desire. (When she first forces him to drink alcohol, the mind leaps to Marlene Dietrich in The Blue Angel.) In becoming a slave to love, D-503 becomes, briefly, a free man. In Randall's hands, Zamyatin's modernist idiom crackles ("I only remember his fingers: they flew out of his sleeve, like bundles of beams"), though the novel sometimes seems prophetic of the onset of Stalinism, particularly in the bleak ending. Modern Library's reintroduction of Zamyatin's novel is a literary event sure to bring this neglected classic to the attention of a new readership.
扎米亚京没有声嘶力竭,相反他用他冷静的笔触描绘了这样一个美好的乌托邦联众国。没有自由,没有痛苦,没有嫉妒,没有人。只有时间表,只有精确如数学的幸福,只有没有拒绝的性,只有众号码们。 当D -503不再是个号码,他在和内心中的另一个自己搏斗。是亲爱的I勾引了他,不道...
評分尤金·扎米亚金的《我们》是世界三大反乌托邦小说里出现得最早的一部,却也是国内最少见的一部。相比之下,赫胥黎的《美丽的新世界》版本比较多,而乔治·奥威尔的《1984》则更为出名。不过,正是因为《我们》的少见,才让更多的读者对这部开反乌托邦小说之先河的作品充满...
評分扎米亚京的《我们》与奥威尔的《1984》及赫胥黎的《美丽新世界》并称为20世纪文坛“反乌托邦三部曲”,对后世有着深远的影响。不过相比之下,《我们》虽然成书最早,更为另两部作品直接提供了灵感,其知名度却低了不少,这也是由于此书在苏联一直遭禁,直到解体前才得出版之故...
評分扎米亚京的《我们》与奥威尔的《1984》及赫胥黎的《美丽新世界》并称为20世纪文坛“反乌托邦三部曲”,对后世有着深远的影响。不过相比之下,《我们》虽然成书最早,更为另两部作品直接提供了灵感,其知名度却低了不少,这也是由于此书在苏联一直遭禁,直到解体前才得出版之故...
評分我们。有的时候,这是一个温暖的词,不只是我,还有我们。 但是,当“我们”吞噬了“我”的时候呢? 大三的时候看了《一九八四》,震撼。原来一段历史是可以这样被提前讲述的。我想所有对那段荒唐岁月有所认知的中国人都会以一种不一样的心态去看《一九八四》。奥...
結尾齣乎意料,看完後不免有些唏噓。這本書是俄羅斯作傢紮米亞金在1921年寫成的,也算是反烏托邦作品的鼻祖瞭。喬治奧威爾的《1984》肯定是受到瞭這本書的啓發,裏麵有不少其中的影子。書的情節鬆垮,但意義重大。對毫無感性的人類生活的描寫,讓人不寒而栗。周同學用catharsis來形容讀後感,很有感,謝謝你帶來這本好書。
评分結尾齣乎意料,看完後不免有些唏噓。這本書是俄羅斯作傢紮米亞金在1921年寫成的,也算是反烏托邦作品的鼻祖瞭。喬治奧威爾的《1984》肯定是受到瞭這本書的啓發,裏麵有不少其中的影子。書的情節鬆垮,但意義重大。對毫無感性的人類生活的描寫,讓人不寒而栗。周同學用catharsis來形容讀後感,很有感,謝謝你帶來這本好書。
评分rationality與human nature的對抗
评分結尾齣乎意料,看完後不免有些唏噓。這本書是俄羅斯作傢紮米亞金在1921年寫成的,也算是反烏托邦作品的鼻祖瞭。喬治奧威爾的《1984》肯定是受到瞭這本書的啓發,裏麵有不少其中的影子。書的情節鬆垮,但意義重大。對毫無感性的人類生活的描寫,讓人不寒而栗。周同學用catharsis來形容讀後感,很有感,謝謝你帶來這本好書。
评分rationality與human nature的對抗
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有