Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago "the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind." Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.
Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. "Beware intellectuals," he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). "Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice." Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.
具体描述
读后感
刚读毕《知识分子》（保罗·约翰逊著），国内发行本缺关于马克思的那一章，网上有译文。 作者认为知识分子应为本世纪那些造成巨大社会灾难的计划负责，作者对一些著名知识分子追名逐利、言行不一进行了揭露（从学术看很难进行事实反驳），这是本书的价值之一。但是作者选取的十...
评分一 人性 约翰逊对这些臭名昭著的知识分子作了一份详细的考察，他们身上固然有知识分子一些特有的毛病：自大、虚荣、漠视他人、自我中心等等，但如果全部视为他们的问题，或者只有他们存在问题，是否有失偏颇？ 约翰逊应该再写一本《大众》或《人性》，与之对照，看看这些臭名...
评分之前看了两章，今晚继续，保罗·约翰逊的【知识分子】，眼中一片悲凉。作为文字的生产者，他们都热爱抽象的人，但大多并不能延伸到任何一个具体的人，当然，除了自己。他们热衷与观察这个社会和之间的人，包括自己，带着浓厚的主观色彩，不可否认，正是这些主观的东西让他们的...
评分书中很多人都是我其实很喜欢的，包括卢梭、雪莱、罗素、萨特和波伏瓦等。 也许正是因为很喜欢，所以并不惮看到约翰逊不留情面的批评。 有时候我们自己也很难区分清楚，自己究竟是喜欢一个人的思想，还是喜欢这个人所竖立的公众形象。 约翰逊的书，一方面给我们敲了警钟，不...
评分想必作者肯定不喜欢尼采的超人思想吧？ 作者所谓的知识分子“抽象”思考的人，是保罗定义为作者本人必须符合其“抽象”思考的人的未来类型。 尼采的超人思想是追求的一种人的类型，是超越现在的未来人，他高屋建瓴的仰望的未来的人的类型，而不是现存的人。保罗真是误导了广大...
用户评价
痛骂左派，阶级立场鲜明。
评分关于马克思那篇中文版删除。
评分痛骂左派，阶级立场鲜明。
评分以记者的笔法写伟人八卦 有趣 有料 也有偏见
评分痛骂左派，阶级立场鲜明。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有