Harry G. Frankfurt is a professor of philosophy emeritus at Princeton University. His books include The Reasons of Love; Necessity, Volition, and Love; and The Importance of What We Care About. He lives in Princeton, New Jersey.
One of the most salient features of our culture is that there is so much bullshit. Everyone knows this. Each of us contributes his share. But we tend to take the situation for granted. Most people are rather confident of their ability to recognize bullshit and to avoid being taken in by it. So the phenomenon has not aroused much deliberate concern. We have no clear understanding of what bullshit is, why there is so much of it, or what functions it serves. And we lack a conscientiously developed appreciation of what it means to us. In other words, as Harry Frankfurt writes, "we have no theory."
Frankfurt, one of the world's most influential moral philosophers, attempts to build such a theory here. With his characteristic combination of philosophical acuity, psychological insight, and wry humor, Frankfurt proceeds by exploring how bullshit and the related concept of humbug are distinct from lying. He argues that bullshitters misrepresent themselves to their audience not as liars do, that is, by deliberately making false claims about what is true. In fact, bullshit need not be untrue at all.
Rather, bullshitters seek to convey a certain impression of themselves without being concerned about whether anything at all is true. They quietly change the rules governing their end of the conversation so that claims about truth and falsity are irrelevant. Frankfurt concludes that although bullshit can take many innocent forms, excessive indulgence in it can eventually undermine the practitioner's capacity to tell the truth in a way that lying does not. Liars at least acknowledge that it matters what is true. By virtue of this, Frankfurt writes, bullshit is a greater enemy of the truth than lies are.
112页,前言两篇,趣读两篇,行间距疏可跑马,开本787×1092mm,横竖放不进正常的书丛里面去,从印刷的角度讲,可真是浪费了纸张。好在内容尚可一观,对扯淡,有一些非常有趣的论述。不过,通篇读下来,将扯淡与放屁、狗屁、瞎扯、胡扯等词之间的差异未能讲清楚,比较遗憾...
評分李敖在《中国性研究》里面讲过这样一个有趣的笑话: 兄弟二人,赴京赶考,兄中状元,弟弟落第。弟弟先返乡,弟媳不乐。入夜,弟弟语其妻曰:“别以为考上状元有什么好,考上后,那话儿就没有了!”弟媳信以为真,破涕为笑,反倒庆幸自己丈夫落第。第二天,偷偷告诉嫂嫂,说哥...
評分李敖在《中国性研究》里面讲过这样一个有趣的笑话: 兄弟二人,赴京赶考,兄中状元,弟弟落第。弟弟先返乡,弟媳不乐。入夜,弟弟语其妻曰:“别以为考上状元有什么好,考上后,那话儿就没有了!”弟媳信以为真,破涕为笑,反倒庆幸自己丈夫落第。第二天,偷偷告诉嫂嫂,说哥...
評分刚读完《论扯淡》。 一本绝对变态的书。 且慢,绝非变相的夸赞这本书无比绝妙酣畅淋漓的谈论这对事。这是我在当当网买到的书最为意外的一本。书很薄,这也罢了,为了显厚,外加一硬皮包装,又来一腰封,扯掉硬皮包装后。Oh,my god!还有一厚厚的红色封皮,上书三个大字“论扯...
評分这也许是一个难以接受的现实,但无法否认的是,我们生活在一个充满废话的社会里。 有些时候,废话是人际沟通的润滑剂,没有这些废话,大家都会觉得很尴尬。我们可以设想这样一个情境:你与一个点头之交同乘一趟电梯,除你们之外没有其他人,你会说些什么呢?天气、着装、要去...
關於鬍說八道的哲學分析。 如果更年輕的時候讀這個,可能會覺得這本書本身就是在扯淡,但是現在讀,的確是感受到瞭其中進行的哲學分析。還蠻有意思的一本小書
评分Holy crap, can't get the point.
评分尼瑪就是GRE閱讀,難以相信這本書竟然是紐約時報暢銷書。買瞭的人肯定都後悔買瞭這麼一本把bullshit作為主題的學術著作。
评分Interesting points on bullshit. Great methodology guide on how to unravel a concept as a research topic. [CRM 8102 Course reading]
评分sincerity itself is bullshit
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有