By a wide measure of assent, Edward Said was one of the most important scholars examining society, politics and culture. A Palestinian-American, his life had been shaped by the cross-currents of race, globalization and nationalist violence. Said emerged as a leading figure in the dialogue between occidentalism and orientalism, making seminal contributions to our understanding of colonialism, postcolonialism and the responsibilities of criticism. He was one of the figures cited most frequently in the Social Science Citation Index, and one of the few, genuinely global, public intellectuals.</p>
</p>
This exhaustive and unparalleled collection draws together the essential writings on Said's thought in a collection which any serious student of contemporary social thought will find indispensable. Planned and produced with a view to provide an accessible and reliable survey of all aspects of Said's voluminous writings, the collection is divided into four sections.</p>
</p>
Section 1: Intellectuals and Critics: Positions and Polemics</p>
</p>
Included here are reflections on some of the master-themes in Said's thought: the question of the displacement of the intellectual critic; the metaphysics of critical `homelessness', the challenges of exile; Said's relation to post-colonialism; and the important debates between Said, Aijaz Ahmad and Walzer. The challenging and controversial nature of many of Said's ideas are fully explored and the originality of his position on intellectual criticism and post-colonialism is properly acknowledged.</p>
</p>
Section 2: Versions of Orientalism</p>
</p>
Said's study of orientalism was arguably a break-through work, rapidly establishing him as a central cultural critic of modern times. Said's study was instrumental in opening up postcolonialism as an area of analysis. In this section the relevance of orientalism to the study of culture is examined, and the antinomies of orientalism are surveyed. Said was fully aware that he was writing about a contested subject when he published Orientalism. Here, the axes of contestation are brought together, and their power is compared and contrasted. The section includes discussions of the relevance of orientlaism to the study of Japan; Barthes and orientalism; China and orientalism; orientalism and the Third World; feminism, imperialism and orientalism; orientalism, the West and Islam and orientalism and technology. </p>
</p>
Section 3: Cultural Forms, Disciplinary Boundaries</p>
</p>
Said's interest in the politics of power and domination is richly explored in his thought on disciplinary boundaries. His work can be partly understood as an attack on certain forms of institutionalized epistemology, but always, with a conviction that the necessity of truth is the sine quo non of academic debate. This section provides readers with insights into the breadth and quality of Said's writings. It includes reflections on Said's Culture and Imperialism; nationalism, colonialism and post-colonialism; music, literature and emotion; Said and the study of history; Said, anthropology and ethnography; language and war; representations of domination through aesthetic forms; and multiculturalism, geography and postcolonial theory. What comes through most powerfully is the sheer expanse and inspired relevance of Said's thought to understanding the present and the relationship between history and the present.</p>
</p>
Section 4: Theory and Politics</p>
</p>
The questions that Said devoted himself to studying have very wide implications into the organization of self and society. Indeed, Said was an exemplary political writer, in as much as he never stints on his attempt to demonstrate the relevance of theory for practice. This section fully explores these aspects of Said's work. It includes discussions of colonialism and discrimination; the cult of theory; the politics of nonidentity; the power of the word; the relationship between Jameson and Said; Said and cultural relativism; Fanon and Said; Chomsku and Said; the relevance of Said's thought to understanding minority culture; Palestine and the betrayal of history; and the psychology of nationalism.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的风格是那种古典而又带着强烈现代批判性的混合体,它让我联想到了某些十九世纪的伟大思想家面对工业革命的冲击时所流露出的那种复杂情绪——既有对知识体系的极度自信,又不乏对时代精神迷失的深切忧虑。作者的叙事节奏并非线性推进,而是像音乐中的赋格曲,不同的主题不断交织、回响,主题和变奏在不同的篇章中反复出现,每一次的重逢都带来了新的理解层次。我特别喜欢他处理引文和案例时的那种克制与精准,他从不滥用他人的智慧,而是将引用的材料熔铸成自己论证的有机组成部分。读到后半部分,我感觉自己已经完全沉浸在了作者构建的那个思想宇宙中,一种宏大叙事下的个体能动性与结构性限制之间的永恒拉锯,被描绘得淋漓尽致。这绝非易读之物,但其思想的深度和广度,足以让任何一个严肃的阅读者付出时间去探索。
评分这本书的文本质感,初读时便给我一种深沉的、近乎压抑的智识重量感。它并非那种可以轻松翻阅的消遣之作,更像是一块需要用尽全力去雕琢的璞玉,每一次触碰都能感受到作者在思想的深处挖掘的决心与痛苦。我尤其欣赏它那种近乎百科全书式的博学,但这种博学并非炫耀式的堆砌,而是内化为一种看待世界的底层逻辑,像是一张精密的网,将看似无关的文化现象、历史断层和社会结构无形地连接起来。阅读的过程,与其说是知识的吸收,不如说是一场漫长的精神洗礼,作者总能精准地抓住那些我们习以为常却从未深思的悖论,并用一种近乎残忍的清晰度将其剖开。那种在不同语境、不同时代之间自由穿梭的叙事能力,让人惊叹于作者的心智疆域之广阔。他仿佛站在历史的最高点,以一种近乎悲悯的视角俯瞰着人类文明的起伏跌宕,文字里流淌着一种难以言喻的沧桑感,读罢掩卷,周遭的世界似乎都蒙上了一层全新的、更复杂的色彩。
评分说实话,这本书的阅读体验是极具挑战性的,它要求读者具备极高的耐心和相当的背景知识储备,否则很容易在那些迂回的论证和密集的学术引证中迷失方向。但一旦你跟上了作者的思维节奏,那种豁然开朗的体验是无与伦比的。作者对于“他者”构建的细腻分析,简直像一位高明的心理侧写师,层层剥开权力话语是如何将异质的文化简化、异化,直至服务于某种既定叙事的需要。我反复咀嚼了其中关于“东方主义想象”那几章的论述,那种将文化地理学与政治权力分析相结合的笔法,简直是教科书级别的范例。它不仅仅是在批判一种思潮,更是在揭示一种深刻的认知陷阱——我们如何通过“看见”来“构建”世界,以及这种构建如何反过来塑造了我们自身的存在状态。语言的密度极高,毫不拖泥带水,每一个句子的背后似乎都蕴藏着数年的研究和深思熟虑,让人不得不放慢速度,逐字逐句地去品味其内在的张力。
评分我必须承认,这本书的阅读过程更像是一场持久的智力马拉松,而非轻松的短跑。它那种对西方中心主义叙事模式的彻底解构,是建立在极其扎实的文本细读和历史考察之上的。作者展现出的那种对文化霸权的深刻理解,不是停留在口号式的批判,而是落实到了对具体话语实践的微观分析上。比如,他对某些经典文本的重新解读,简直像是在做一场“思想考古”,挖出了那些被光鲜外表所掩盖的、权力运作的陈旧地基。这种解构的力度是极强的,它让你对自己阅读过的很多“常识”产生怀疑,这正是好书的标志之一。全书的结构非常严谨,逻辑链条环环相扣,即便在探讨最抽象的概念时,作者也能巧妙地将其锚定在具体的历史场景中,使得理论的阐述既保持了思辨的高度,又不失文本的温度。这是一种罕见的、将宏大理论与精微文本分析完美结合的典范。
评分这本书给我的感觉,就像是走进了一座宏伟却布满了迷宫的图书馆,你不知道下一转角会遇到的是启蒙时代的哲学手稿,还是十九世纪的殖民地报告。作者的笔锋极为犀利,他有一种穿透表象直达核心的本领,尤其是在探讨文化与地缘政治的共谋关系时,那种洞察力令人不寒而栗。他构建的理论框架如同一个精密的钟表,各个齿轮——无论是文学批评、历史地理学还是政治经济学——都咬合得天衣无缝,共同驱动着对现代性危机的一次深刻叩问。阅读过程中,我经常需要停下来,合上书本,在房间里踱步,试图消化那些颠覆性的观点。这本书的价值,不在于提供一个轻松的答案,而在于它强迫你放弃所有舒适的既有立场,去直面那些令人不安的复杂性。它不是一本让人读完后心情愉悦的书,但它绝对是一本能重塑你认知地图的杰作。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有