马泰·卡林内斯库(Matei Calinescu),美国印第安纳大学比较文学教授。著有《文学与政治》(1982)、《现代主义与意识形态》(1986)等。
"Five Faces of Modernity" is a series of semantic and cultural biographies of words that have taken on special significance in the last century and a half or so: "modernity," "avant-garde," "decadence," "kitsch," and "postmodernism." The concept of modernity--the notion that we, the living, are different and somehow superior to our predecessors and that our civilization is likely to be succeeded by one even superior to ours--is a relatively recent Western invention and one whose time may already have passed, if we believe its postmodern challengers. Calinescu documents the rise of cultural modernity and, in tracing the shifting senses of the five terms under scrutiny, illustrates the intricate value judgments, conflicting orientations, and intellectual paradoxes to which it has given rise.
"Five Faces of Modernity" attempts to do for the foundations of the modernist critical lexicon what earlier terminological studies have done for such complex categories as "classicism," "baroque," "romanticism," "realism," or "symbolism" and thereby fill a gap in literary scholarship. On another, more ambitious level, Calinescu deals at length with the larger issues, dilemmas, ideological tensions, and perplexities brought about by the assertion of modernity.
导读(译者言) 两种尖锐冲突而相互依存的现代性:社会现代性(资产阶级的现代性)和审美现代性(文化现代性和文学现代性) 现代主义:十九世纪和二十世纪之交的产物,并不号称终于历史,忠于当下鲜活的个人经验。 先锋派:十九世纪,先锋派的概念只是现代性的一种激进化的、高...
评分西方文学理论看得很少,所以这本很有名的《现代性的五副面孔》我没有看太懂,呃……其实基本看懂了书里在说什么,但是很惭愧看完后没有什么自己的见解,所以借豆瓣整理一下思路。 一.现代性的概念 ·以古今之争分析了现代和古代的关系,从“古代巨人肩膀上的现代侏儒”到“螺...
评分诚如译者在前言中所说的那样,我们似乎生活在一个言必称现代性的时代。人们常常使用现代一词去指称十八九世纪工业革命以来人们的经济生活与社会生活发生的革命性变化,科技与理性在其中起着重要的作用,从二十世纪一直到今天,这个词在大众的认知里又被更新为互联网的普及及其...
评分现代性 社会现代性和审美现代性是一对矛盾。前者是指科学进步、工业革命、资本主义带来的全面经济社会变化的产物。而后者自浪漫派的开端就倾向于激进的反资产阶级态度。通过反叛、无政府、天启主义、自我流放等多样手段来表达厌恶。 资本主义体制产生于新教伦理...
评分卧槽这么多页怎么可能下周就写出review来???拙计!!!
评分only introduction
评分a very easy read. His analysis on revolutionary politics and Utopia is esp. relevant to regard the modernity in China.
评分more factual than Benjamin, more readable than Nietzsche
评分2018
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有