Malcolm Gladwell is a former business and science writer at the Washington Post. He is currently a staff writer for The New Yorker. This is his first book.
The Tipping Point is that magical moment when an idea, trend, or social behaviour crosses a threshhold, tips, and spreads like wildfire. Just as a sick individual in a crowded store can start can epidemic of the flu, so too can a small but precisely targeted push cause a fashion trend or the popularity of a new restaurant to take off overnightor crime or drug use to taper off. Gladwell has explored this theory to great acclaim in several articles in The New Yorker. Here, he shows how very minor adjustments in products and ideas can make them more likely to become hugely popular. He reveals how east it is to cause group behaviour to tip in a desirable direction by making small changes in our immediate environment. The Tipping Point contains a profoundly hopeful idea that people will embrace for its sense and simplicity: one imaginative person, applying a well-placed lever, can move the world. Examples are recognizable: in the New York subways, removing graffiti caused a dramatic reduction in crime; a specific hip group of teenagers wore Hush Puppies and suddenly sparked a national craze. This is a book that should be read by everyone in business, politics, marketing, advertising, and anyone interested in trends, fashion, fads, policy making, and human behaviour. In other words, all of us.
理论论叙太多,看不到亮点。 本书只能做为已发生的现象分析,没有从中学到,到底要做什么事才有可能会引爆流行。 中文译本翻译错误还是有蛮多。 个人觉得本书如果叫《群体效应》可能会更贴主题。
评分春节期间,花了点时间读了这本书。中信出版社出版的,可能是翻译上的问题吧,觉得有些地方不是很通顺,但是不影响对主题的理解。 老外就是有科学的研究精神,很常见的流行事件,能用科学的思维方式去加以概括,并指引人去解释生活中的流行事件,进而去引发、创造流行事件。 ...
评分理论论叙太多,看不到亮点。 本书只能做为已发生的现象分析,没有从中学到,到底要做什么事才有可能会引爆流行。 中文译本翻译错误还是有蛮多。 个人觉得本书如果叫《群体效应》可能会更贴主题。
评分引爆点-Malcolm Gladwell 这本书结构看起来很简单,典型的德国哲学家黑格尔"三段式",即“认为一切发展都经历三个阶段,即发展的起点(正题),对立面的显现(反题),对立面的统一(合题)。反题否定正题,合题否定反题,合题是否定之否定。黑格尔把三段式作为论证其客观...
评分理论论叙太多,看不到亮点。 本书只能做为已发生的现象分析,没有从中学到,到底要做什么事才有可能会引爆流行。 中文译本翻译错误还是有蛮多。 个人觉得本书如果叫《群体效应》可能会更贴主题。
Not as good as Outliers or Blink
评分例证啰唆,反复地说……
评分例证啰唆,反复地说……
评分the strength of weak ties. mavens. social networks. communication styles. 写得实在太罗嗦了!
评分the strength of weak ties. mavens. social networks. communication styles. 写得实在太罗嗦了!
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有