图书标签: 肖斯塔科维奇 英文 Volkov Shostakovich Polemic
发表于2024-12-22
Shostakovich Reconsidered pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
Allan Ho and Dmitry Feofanov systematically address all of the accusations levelled at Testimony and Solomon Volkov, Shostakovich's amanuensis, amassing an enormous amount of material about Shostakovich and his position in Soviet society and burying forever the picture of Shostakovich as a willing participant in the communist charade. Their analysis is complemented by a generous number of other essays, many of them by Shostakovich's close friends and acquaintances, and an interview with Solomon Volkov in which he explains how he worked with Shostakovich to help him write Testimony. Other contributors include the composer's son, Maxim, the cellist and conductor Mstislav Rostropovich and the poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko, whose verses of protest Shostakovich set in the Thirteenth Symphony. The book concludes with a bravura examination by Ian MacDonald of Shostakovich's political attitudes considered against the contemporary events that shaped them. The book does more than set the record straight -- it establishes beyond any doubt the enormous courage of one of the moral giants of the age.
书太厚,800页,读不完,努力读了一半。两位作者旗帜鲜明地力挺伏尔科夫,像律师在法庭上慷慨陈词,详细列举证据,试图将质疑派一举驳倒。论辩中时有逻辑不通、诡辩、人身攻击,而且质疑派曾暗示Ho的俄文都不甚好。但二位收集材料和证据十分齐备(当然会出现不提不利于己方证据的情况),对于Fay和Taruskin等人的某些质疑,确有合理的反击。虽然火气较大,大字报味道稍浓,但作为相反意见的代表,也不可完全忽略。总之,有一定的价值。
评分书太厚,800页,读不完,努力读了一半。两位作者旗帜鲜明地力挺伏尔科夫,像律师在法庭上慷慨陈词,详细列举证据,试图将质疑派一举驳倒。论辩中时有逻辑不通、诡辩、人身攻击,而且质疑派曾暗示Ho的俄文都不甚好。但二位收集材料和证据十分齐备(当然会出现不提不利于己方证据的情况),对于Fay和Taruskin等人的某些质疑,确有合理的反击。虽然火气较大,大字报味道稍浓,但作为相反意见的代表,也不可完全忽略。总之,有一定的价值。
评分书太厚,800页,读不完,努力读了一半。两位作者旗帜鲜明地力挺伏尔科夫,像律师在法庭上慷慨陈词,详细列举证据,试图将质疑派一举驳倒。论辩中时有逻辑不通、诡辩、人身攻击,而且质疑派曾暗示Ho的俄文都不甚好。但二位收集材料和证据十分齐备(当然会出现不提不利于己方证据的情况),对于Fay和Taruskin等人的某些质疑,确有合理的反击。虽然火气较大,大字报味道稍浓,但作为相反意见的代表,也不可完全忽略。总之,有一定的价值。
评分书太厚,800页,读不完,努力读了一半。两位作者旗帜鲜明地力挺伏尔科夫,像律师在法庭上慷慨陈词,详细列举证据,试图将质疑派一举驳倒。论辩中时有逻辑不通、诡辩、人身攻击,而且质疑派曾暗示Ho的俄文都不甚好。但二位收集材料和证据十分齐备(当然会出现不提不利于己方证据的情况),对于Fay和Taruskin等人的某些质疑,确有合理的反击。虽然火气较大,大字报味道稍浓,但作为相反意见的代表,也不可完全忽略。总之,有一定的价值。
评分书太厚,800页,读不完,努力读了一半。两位作者旗帜鲜明地力挺伏尔科夫,像律师在法庭上慷慨陈词,详细列举证据,试图将质疑派一举驳倒。论辩中时有逻辑不通、诡辩、人身攻击,而且质疑派曾暗示Ho的俄文都不甚好。但二位收集材料和证据十分齐备(当然会出现不提不利于己方证据的情况),对于Fay和Taruskin等人的某些质疑,确有合理的反击。虽然火气较大,大字报味道稍浓,但作为相反意见的代表,也不可完全忽略。总之,有一定的价值。
评分
评分
评分
评分
Shostakovich Reconsidered pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024