To be modern may mean many different things, but for nineteenth-century Europeans 'modernity' suggested a new form of life in which bourgeois activities, people, attitudes and values all played key roles. Jerrold Seigel's panoramic new history offers a magisterial and highly original account of the ties between modernity and bourgeois life, arguing that they can be best understood not in terms of the rise and fall of social classes, but as features of a common participation in expanding and thickening 'networks of means' that linked together distant energies and resources across economic, political and cultural life. Exploring the different configurations of these networks in England, France and Germany, he shows how their patterns gave rise to distinctive forms of modernity in each country and shaped the rhythm and nature of change across spheres as diverse as politics, money and finance, gender relations, morality, and literary, artistic and musical life.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
去階級鬥爭的角度寫歐洲的現代化發展和資産階級生活，有意思。我贊同作者的觀點，歐洲，尤其英法德三國，其現代化曆程在曆史寫作和思考中是不應該provincialization的。
评分去階級鬥爭的角度寫歐洲的現代化發展和資産階級生活，有意思。我贊同作者的觀點，歐洲，尤其英法德三國，其現代化曆程在曆史寫作和思考中是不應該provincialization的。
评分去階級鬥爭的角度寫歐洲的現代化發展和資産階級生活，有意思。我贊同作者的觀點，歐洲，尤其英法德三國，其現代化曆程在曆史寫作和思考中是不應該provincialization的。
评分去階級鬥爭的角度寫歐洲的現代化發展和資産階級生活，有意思。我贊同作者的觀點，歐洲，尤其英法德三國，其現代化曆程在曆史寫作和思考中是不應該provincialization的。
评分去階級鬥爭的角度寫歐洲的現代化發展和資産階級生活，有意思。我贊同作者的觀點，歐洲，尤其英法德三國，其現代化曆程在曆史寫作和思考中是不應該provincialization的。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有