图书标签: 法学  法哲学  思想史   

喜欢 Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence 的读者还喜欢

第六章论述弱立场自然法理论会必然走入强立场自然法理论精妙而难懂。有空再看。理论史鲜明活泼，理解形式主义与实证主义、法律实证主义和社会学实证主义之间的差别，很重要。

三年前只有我一个人标记，三年后还是如此。。。作者显然同情包容性实证主义，但这场争论已经快被大家遗弃。对过程学派的描述最为细致，只是将实证主义和形式主义的关系颠倒过来，反倒认为前者是更大范畴，这令人略微惊讶。

三年前只有我一个人标记，三年后还是如此。。。作者显然同情包容性实证主义，但这场争论已经快被大家遗弃。对过程学派的描述最为细致，只是将实证主义和形式主义的关系颠倒过来，反倒认为前者是更大范畴，这令人略微惊讶。

三年前只有我一个人标记，三年后还是如此。。。作者显然同情包容性实证主义，但这场争论已经快被大家遗弃。对过程学派的描述最为细致，只是将实证主义和形式主义的关系颠倒过来，反倒认为前者是更大范畴，这令人略微惊讶。

第六章论述弱立场自然法理论会必然走入强立场自然法理论精妙而难懂。有空再看。理论史鲜明活泼，理解形式主义与实证主义、法律实证主义和社会学实证主义之间的差别，很重要。

Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence Anthony J. Sebok Cambridge University Press, 1998. Page2. The fact that the term legal positivism was rarely used before 1940,and probably never used before 1927,does not mean that the theoretical content of lega...

Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence Anthony J. Sebok Cambridge University Press, 1998. Page2. The fact that the term legal positivism was rarely used before 1940,and probably never used before 1927,does not mean that the theoretical content of lega...

Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence Anthony J. Sebok Cambridge University Press, 1998. Page2. The fact that the term legal positivism was rarely used before 1940,and probably never used before 1927,does not mean that the theoretical content of lega...

Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence Anthony J. Sebok Cambridge University Press, 1998. Page2. The fact that the term legal positivism was rarely used before 1940,and probably never used before 1927,does not mean that the theoretical content of lega...

Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence Anthony J. Sebok Cambridge University Press, 1998. Page2. The fact that the term legal positivism was rarely used before 1940,and probably never used before 1927,does not mean that the theoretical content of lega...