Why Nations Fail

Why Nations Fail pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025

德隆·阿西莫格魯是麻省理工學院(MIT)的基利安經濟學教授。2005年,他獲得瞭奬給40歲以下對經濟學思想和知識做齣重大貢獻的經濟學傢的約翰·貝茨·剋拉剋奬。

詹姆斯·A. 羅賓遜,政治學傢和經濟學傢,是哈佛大學的大衛·弗羅倫斯政府學教授。世界著名的拉美和非洲問題專傢,他長期在博茨瓦納、毛裏求斯、塞拉利昂和南非工作。

出版者:Random House Audio
作者:Daron Acemoglu
出品人:
頁數:14
译者:
出版時間:2012-3-20
價格:CAD 58.00
裝幀:Audio CD
isbn號碼:9780307987457
叢書系列:
圖書標籤:
  • 政治經濟 
  • 英文原版 
  • 社會 
  • 政論 
  • 政治學 
  • 思考方法 
  • 學者 
  • 聽說不錯相看看 
  •  
想要找書就要到 小哈圖書下載中心
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁
你會得到大驚喜!!

Brilliant and engagingly written, Why Nations Fail answers the question that has stumped the experts for centuries: Why are some nations rich and others poor, divided by wealth and poverty, health and sickness, food and famine?

Is it culture, the weather, geography? Perhaps ignorance of what the right policies are?

Simply, no. None of these factors is either definitive or destiny. Otherwise, how to explain why Botswana has become one of the fastest growing countries in the world, while other African nations, such as Zimbabwe, the Congo, and Sierra Leone, are mired in poverty and violence?

Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson conclusively show that it is man-made political and economic institutions that underlie economic success (or lack of it). Korea, to take just one of their fascinating examples, is a remarkably homogeneous nation, yet the people of North Korea are among the poorest on earth while their brothers and sisters in South Korea are among the richest. The south forged a society that created incentives, rewarded innovation, and allowed everyone to participate in economic opportunities. The economic success thus spurred was sustained because the government became accountable and responsive to citizens and the great mass of people. Sadly, the people of the north have endured decades of famine, political repression, and very different economic institutions—with no end in sight. The differences between the Koreas is due to the politics that created these completely different institutional trajectories.

Based on fifteen years of original research Acemoglu and Robinson marshall extraordinary historical evidence from the Roman Empire, the Mayan city-states, medieval Venice, the Soviet Union, Latin America, England, Europe, the United States, and Africa to build a new theory of political economy with great relevance for the big questions of today, including:

- China has built an authoritarian growth machine. Will it continue to grow at such high speed andoverwhelm the West?

- Are America’s best days behind it? Are we moving from a virtuous circle in which efforts by elites to aggrandize power are resisted to a vicious one that enriches and empowers a small minority?

- What is the most effective way to help move billions of people from the rut of poverty to prosperity? More

philanthropy from the wealthy nations of the West? Or learning the hard-won lessons of Acemoglu and Robinson’s breakthrough ideas on the interplay between inclusive political and economic institutions?

Why Nations Fail will change the way you look at—and understand—the world.

具體描述

讀後感

評分

围绕本书主旨的争论其实至少早在英文原版成书前十年就开始了。正如很多评论都提到的,本书两位作者与长期合作伙伴 Simon Johnson (合称 AJR)2001年发表论文[1]以计量手段论证:制度是经济绩效的根本性决定因素,而纬度、气候、资源等则影响甚微。这就直接否定了认为地理等因...  

評分

非虚构类,多细节,总有一点你所不知道的。关于版本选择问题,我自己打印的台版无删节版,这个版本也是众多网友共同努力制作而成的,在此向那些热心网友表示感谢。中文版肯定有删节,比如,第一章讲的是阿拉伯之春,估计肯定要被和谐。关于英语原版,我推荐将mobi格式转化成wor...  

評分

我为了这本书思考了很久,然后在网上看了一篇,能解释我的疑惑,特地来豆瓣注册账号发表一下,文章转自方绍伟同志。 从制度方面探寻经济发展的原因,一直是近几十年来西方学术界的一个热门话题。2012年3月,麻省理工学院的德隆·阿西莫格鲁教授与当时任教于哈佛大学的詹姆斯·...  

評分

一直到最近兩位作者戴倫.艾塞默魯、詹姆斯.羅賓森的新書《自由的窄廊》出了,才忽然想起之前買的這本《國家為什麼會失敗》還沒看。這本推薦的人很多,批評的當然也不少。這是一個很廣很大,爭議性高的題目,因為導致這個結果的變數太多,其實很難歸納出一套完整的論述去說明...  

評分

这个书是看到任志强提起过,后来翻看了一下英文版,里面讲到挺多有关制度的问题,诸如这些观点:一个国家只要采取了攫取性政治制度和攫取性经济制度,那么注定会失败,发达的国家都是采取了包容性的制度。我想这个书出版简体版本怕是遥遥无期,没想到时隔两年就有引进大...

用戶評價

评分

(inclusive institutions & extractive institutions )其實就是近代史,Acemoglu分瞭 類,不覺得有這必要。

评分

(inclusive institutions & extractive institutions )其實就是近代史,Acemoglu分瞭 類,不覺得有這必要。

评分

(inclusive institutions & extractive institutions )其實就是近代史,Acemoglu分瞭 類,不覺得有這必要。

评分

(inclusive institutions & extractive institutions )其實就是近代史,Acemoglu分瞭 類,不覺得有這必要。

评分

(inclusive institutions & extractive institutions )其實就是近代史,Acemoglu分瞭 類,不覺得有這必要。

本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有