具体描述
We humans have known for thousands of years that our mental abilities decline as we grow old but, as a formal academic discipline, the study of age-related changes in cognition began in the early 1950s and it is only during the last thirty years that we have begun to understand how these changes are related to the ageing of the brain and the central nervous system, and to differences in health and demographics. In recent decades governments around the world have been panicked into belated recognition of the consequences of rapidly increasing overpopulation and, particularly, of impending demographic imbalance due to increases in life expectancy. Especially in developed Western economies, but also increasingly in Asia, countries imminently face severe population ageing.Within twenty years the largest population cohort in many countries will be those aged over sixty-five, and the average age will be nearly fifty. In the UK, for example, by 2001 there were more people aged over sixty than under sixteen. And, in Japan, people over sixty-five are expected to make up more than one-quarter of the population by 2020. Moreover, the older population itself is ageing. The '80+ cohort' is the fastest-growing section of the older population and the United Nations estimate that the number of centenarians will increase fifteen-fold from approximately 145,000 in 1999 to 2.2 million by 2050.Governments have hoped that even if ageing cannot be abolished, it may be slowed so that dependency and loss of earning power can be delayed, and that better information about the progress of ageing will at least allow us to recognize and prepare for the implications of changes that we now cannot halt. They have consequently responded with funding initiatives for research that have produced an exponential growth in the numbers of investigators working in these fields, in the research students and post-doctorals that they train and supervise, in the undergraduate and graduate courses in cognitive gerontology, and in the neurophysiology and neuropsychology of ageing that they teach.MSc courses in cognitive gerontology are now common and courses in geriatric medicine have been promoted from a marginal to a core topic in medical schools. In short, cognitive and biological ageing has become a fast-growing and dynamic area of study and research, and the scale of this acceleration in growth makes this new four-volume collection in the "Psychology Press Major Works" series, Critical Concepts in Psychology, especially timely. A primary question is why we and all other complex animals and plants age, a question studied mainly by biologists, and Volume I ('Biological Bases of Ageing') includes key research on models for ethological and evolutionary ageing. It also takes full account of the body of work on the genetics of animal and human ageing and on genes that directly cause, or that interact with environmental influences to cause, individual differences in the rate of age-related changes.A quite distinct field of research has been the development of models for cognitive changes in the brain that are based entirely on behavioural evidence. Volume II ('Cognitive Ageing') gathers together the most important work on the search for the neuropsychological bases of cognitive ageing and in so doing helps to make sense of the rapid growth of developments in this area. The third volume in this collection ('Relating Cognitive Ageing to Brain Ageing') makes available the most significant recent research on how the amounts and time-courses of gross age-related changes in local areas of the brain affect cotemporaneous global and local changes in cognitive performance.Specific relationships between global brain changes and cognitive performance are explored, such as that between: increases in the incidence of white-matter lesions and progressive losses of memory and decision speed; cerebral blood flow and intelligence and information-processing speed; and memory impairment and losses of hippocampal volume. Key findings on the relationships between losses of tissue in the frontal lobes of the brain and changes in planning and intelligence is also gathered here, as is research on relationships between changes in neurotransmitter efficiency and in cognitive performance. Finally, the material collected in Volume IV ('The Effects of Health, Demographics and Social Conditions on Rates of Change in Old Age: Interpreting Data from Large Studies') examines how the methodology of longitudinal studies and cross-sectional studies affects the conclusions that can be reached from each and explores recent statistical models to analyse complex data sets.This volume does not simply describe some of the recent discoveries in statistical modelling and experimental design that enhance our use of longitudinal and cross-sectional data, but illustrates applications of these models to obtain new substantive contributions to our knowledge of how longevity - and so the maintenance of mental abilities in old age - are affected by declining health and the increasing burden of pathologies that accumulate as age advances; by the availability or absence of social and family support; by the extent and quality of social networks, and socio-economic advantage with its concomitant benefits of better education and access to medical care; and by diet and the use of tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs.With comprehensive introductions to each volume, newly written by the editor, which places the collected material in historical and scientific context, the "Psychology of Ageing" is destined to be a useful work of reference and valued by scholars, students, and practitioners as a primary research resource.
作者简介
目录信息
读后感
用户评价
这本书的论述深度停留在表面,虽然涵盖了老龄化的诸多方面,但缺乏真正令人耳目一新的洞见。它更像是一本对现有文献的“综述”而非“创新”。书中列举了大量的研究发现和统计数据,比如关于记忆力下降的百分比、不同文化下对“成功老龄化”的定义差异等等,但这些信息大多是我在其他地方已经接触过的基础知识。我期待从这本书中获得一些更深层次的哲学思考,或者是在跨学科交叉领域中对老年人心理状态的独特解读。比如,在探讨“意义感”缺失时,我希望能看到作者结合存在主义哲学或者更前沿的积极心理学理论,提出一种超越传统临床模型的全新解释框架。然而,这本书只是简单地罗列了已有的几个主流理论,然后用一些平淡的总结收尾,并没有深入挖掘这些理论背后的局限性,也没有勇敢地提出自己的颠覆性观点。这种“面面俱到却无一精深”的写作手法,使得整本书读起来索然无味,缺乏那种能让你拍案叫绝的“啊哈!”时刻。对于一本声称是关于“心理学”的专著而言,这种对核心心理学问题的挖掘深度不足,实在令人感到遗憾。
关于这本书的语言风格,简直是一场灾难。它充斥着大量的行话和晦涩难懂的专业术语,很多时候,我不得不频繁地停下来,拿起手机去查阅那些我根本不认识的学术缩写和特定的心理学概念。作者似乎完全沉浸在自己构建的学术小世界里,忘记了并非所有读者都拥有深厚的心理学背景。举个例子,书中有一段描述“元认知监控的动态调节机制”,我读了整整一段,仍然无法确切理解它到底想表达什么,它对一个步入晚年的人的日常决策过程有什么实际影响。这不仅仅是学术性强的问题,而是表达上的不清晰和故作高深。一本好的科普性或面向专业人士的入门书籍,应当能够将复杂的概念,用清晰、简洁、易懂的语言进行阐释,而不是用更多复杂的词汇来包裹住本可以简单阐述的观点。我希望看到的是一种“翻译”的能力,将冰冷的理论转化为生动的画面或可操作的理解。这本书在这方面做得非常不到位,它的文字密度极高,几乎没有呼吸的空间,让阅读过程充满了挫败感,让人感觉作者对读者的智力水平持有一种预设的、较高的门槛。
这本书的封面设计真是太引人注目了,那种柔和的色调和富有设计感的排版,一下子就抓住了我的眼球。我一直对人类心智随时间推移而发生的变化抱有浓厚的兴趣,所以毫不犹豫地买了它。然而,当我真正翻开第一页,我发现这本书的叙事方式有些过于学术化了,仿佛我不是在阅读一本面向大众读者的书籍,而是在研读一本大学的教科书。作者似乎将过多的精力放在了对各种理论模型的梳理和复杂术语的堆砌上,这使得那些原本可能非常引人入胜的关于老年心理学的议题,变得晦涩难懂。例如,在讨论认知衰退的章节中,作者用了大量的篇幅去解释某些神经科学的缩写,而对于这些现象背后的实际生活意义和对普通人意味着什么,着墨却非常少。我期待的是一种更具人文关怀的视角,能看到那些鲜活的、真实的老年人的故事,而不是一堆冰冷的、抽象的数据和图表。我希望能看到关于如何积极应对老年期挑战的实用建议,或者至少是能让人产生共鸣的深度案例分析。总而言之,这本书在学术深度上或许有其价值,但在可读性和普适性方面,我觉得还有很大的提升空间,它更像是为专业人士准备的工具书,而不是给像我这样对该领域抱有好奇心的普通读者准备的入门指南。我对它抱有的那种“哇,这正是我想要的洞察力”的期待,最终落空了。
这本书的结构组织实在让人摸不着头脑,逻辑跳跃性太大,读起来非常费力。每一章似乎都像是一个独立的小册子,章节之间缺乏平滑的过渡和统一的内在联系。我花了很大力气试图在不同的主题之间建立起一座桥梁,比如,在谈论“社会角色转变”的章节后,下一章突然深入到一个我完全没预料到的关于“老年人的睡眠模式与昼夜节律的生物学基础”的细致讨论。这种突兀的切换让我感觉作者没有为读者构建一个清晰的认知地图。我更喜欢那种循序渐进、层层递进的写作方式,比如先从宏观的社会环境变化入手,然后逐步深入到个体的心理适应机制,最后再讨论具体的干预策略。这本书的问题在于,它似乎把所有相关的资料一股脑地倒在了读者面前,期望读者自己去整理和筛选。这对于想要系统性学习的读者来说,是一个巨大的障碍。我甚至怀疑作者在撰写过程中,是否充分考虑了读者的认知负荷。读完几页之后,我常常需要停下来,回顾前面读过的内容,试图重新组织信息流。这种频繁的中断阅读体验,极大地削弱了阅读的乐趣和效率。它更像是一份详尽的、未加编辑的会议记录,而不是一本精心打磨的、有明确导向性的专著。
书中对不同文化背景下老年人心理差异的探讨,感觉非常敷衍和片面。作者似乎主要集中在西方,特别是北美和西欧的研究成果上,而对非西方世界,尤其是亚洲和非洲的老年心智模式,处理得非常草率。在提到“家庭支持系统”时,作者似乎预设了一个核心家庭的西方模型,对于集体主义文化中代际关系对老年人自我认同和心理健康的影响,只有寥寥数语,且缺乏具体的、细致的田野调查作为支撑。这种视角上的局限性,严重削弱了这本书作为一本全面介绍“老龄化心理学”的权威性。如果一本书想要讨论一个全球性的现象,它必须展现出对多元化经验的尊重和深入研究。我希望看到的是那些跨文化研究中出现的有趣对照,比如在某些文化中,衰老被视为智慧的积累,而在另一些地方则被视为失去价值的开始,而这些差异背后的深层心理机制是什么?这本书只是简单地提到了这些差异存在,然后就迅速转向了另一个话题,仿佛这些重要的文化维度是可以被轻易跳过的支线情节。因此,这本书的普适性和全球视野,在我的阅读体验中,是一个明显的短板。