Professor G. S. Graham sets broadly and clearly in perspective the limiting factors which permitted British predominance at sea in the nineteenth century. He introduces the British fleet in its European, Atlantic and Indian Ocean contexts and examines the local as well as the general conditions for its superiority. Naval supremacy is seen as one expression of Britain's industrial and commercial lead, enabling trading routes to be secured, competitors and enemies confined, far-flung geographical entities manipulated. Sea power could not meet the sudden diplomatic crisis on a land-based frontier which might rapidly alter the litoral conditions under which a fleet operated, but, Dr Graham points out, this could scarcely happen around the Indian Ocean or the Pacific. Until the emergence of Japan, followed by the United States in this arena, these oceans offered ideal conditions for the exercise of sea power.
评分
评分
评分
评分
海军政策与帝国政策的联系。 十九世纪“大不列颠海外行动的自由源于欧洲对手的无力”。该书可视为对海权至上论的反驳。
评分海军政策与帝国政策的联系。 十九世纪“大不列颠海外行动的自由源于欧洲对手的无力”。该书可视为对海权至上论的反驳。
评分海军政策与帝国政策的联系。 十九世纪“大不列颠海外行动的自由源于欧洲对手的无力”。该书可视为对海权至上论的反驳。
评分海军政策与帝国政策的联系。 十九世纪“大不列颠海外行动的自由源于欧洲对手的无力”。该书可视为对海权至上论的反驳。
评分海军政策与帝国政策的联系。 十九世纪“大不列颠海外行动的自由源于欧洲对手的无力”。该书可视为对海权至上论的反驳。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有