In the two related works in this volume, Bentham offers a detailed critique of William Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765-9). In 'Comment on the Commentaries', on which Bentham began work in 1774, he exposes the fallacies which he claims to have detected in Blackstone, and criticizes the theory of the Common Law. He goes on to provide important reflections on the nature of law, and more particularly on the nature of customary and of statute law, and on judicial interpretation. A Fragment on Government, which was published in 1776, was detached from the 'Comment on the Commentaries'. Concentrating on a passage of five or six pages in which Blackstone discusses the origin of society and government, Bentham offers three main criticisms. First, he criticizes Blackstone's methodology for failing to distinguish between the role of the expositor and the role of the censor, and thereby confusing the question of what the law is with the question of what the law ought to be. Second, he criticizes Blackstone's assumption that the theory of the social contract represents an adequate justification of the obligation to obey government.Third, he criticizes Blackstone's theory of sovereignty, which claims that in every state there must exist some absolute, undivided power, whose commands are law. Bentham points to the existence of states where sovereign power is both divided and limited. In these two works, published by OUP for the first time, Bentham outlines a number of themes which he goes on to develop in his later works: the principle of utility; the importance of a 'natural arrangement' for a legal system; the point at which resistance to government becomes justifiable; the exposition of legal terms; and much more. The volume also contains Bentham's 'Preface' intended for, but not published in, the second edition of A Fragment on Government, which appeared in 1823. Having by this committed himself to political radicalism, Bentham uses this occasion to reflect on the text and the circumstances in which it was produced. The text has been edited by H.L.A. Hart and J.H. Burns, whose reputations in their respective fields of legal theory and history of political thought are unsurpassed. The volume contains an Editorial Introduction which explains the provenance of the text, and the method of presentation.The texts are fully annotated with textual and historical notes, and the volume is completed with a detailed subject index, based on a methodology devised by Hart.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的气质是沉郁而内敛的,它散发着一股老派学院派的严谨气息,仿佛刚刚从某个尘封已久的图书馆深处被发掘出来。阅读它,就像是与一位深谙世故、却又对知识抱有近乎虔诚态度的老教授进行一对一的交流。他的语言富有层次感,一个长句往往承载着多重否定的复杂逻辑,需要我们像解开古代密码一样去层层剥离。我发现,很多时候,我需要搁置书本,去查阅那些被作者引用但未作详细介绍的原始文献,这本身就构成了一种有趣的“阅读体验”——它强迫我们将阅读从被动接受转变为主动建构知识网络的过程。这种互动性,恰恰是许多当代作品所缺乏的。它不是要告诉你“是什么”,而是引导你去思考“为什么会是这样”,以及“有没有可能是另一种方式”。那些关于既有评论的评论,看似是重复劳动,实则是在对既有框架进行反复的压力测试,探寻其极限和盲区。
评分坦白说,这本书的阅读体验是极具挑战性的,它拒绝走捷径,毫不留情地将读者置于一个充满学术术语和历史典故的漩涡之中。它要求的不只是理解,更是共情——共情作者在面对前人论述时那种既敬畏又批判的复杂心境。全书的节奏是缓慢而坚定的,如同冰川的移动,虽然看似静止,实则蕴含着巨大的、不可逆转的力量。我特别留意到作者处理“政府”这一概念时,那种近乎病态的精确性,仿佛每一个词汇的选择都经过了无数次的称量。这使得本书成为了一面镜子,映照出我们自身语言使用的随意与模糊。对于那些追求清晰、即时满足感的读者而言,这本书可能会显得冗长和晦涩难懂,但对于那些真正热爱思想的慢行者来说,它提供的精神滋养是无可替代的。它不是一个结论的终点,而是一个永无止境的质疑的起点。
评分这部作品,初读时便觉其如同一座宏伟的书房,层层叠叠的知识与思想,需要耐心细致地去探索和品味。它绝非那种一目了然的畅销书,倒更像是一部需要反复摩挲、才能体会其中深意的古籍。作者的笔触极为细腻,尤其是在处理那些看似微不足道的论点时,那种近乎苛刻的推敲,让人不禁思考,在看似稳固的理论基石之下,究竟隐藏了多少被忽略的细枝末节。我常常在阅读中停下来,闭上眼睛,想象着作者当年伏案沉思的场景,那份对真理的执着追求,仿佛穿越时空,与我进行着一场跨越世纪的对话。这种体验是极其宝贵的,它迫使读者跳出既有的思维定式,去审视那些被历史反复强调的“公论”,用一种近乎挑剔的眼光去重新衡量其价值。全书的结构如同一个精密的钟表,每一个章节的衔接都像是齿轮咬合般严丝合缝,然而,这种严谨也带来了一种挑战:对于不熟悉相关学术背景的读者来说,初期的门槛无疑是高耸的。但一旦跨过那道坎,便会发现内部的世界是何等的富饶与辽阔,充满了令人醍醐灌顶的洞察。
评分读完这本书,我脑海中浮现的不是具体的结论,而是一种近乎哲学的震撼感。它更像是一场关于“论证的艺术”的深度剖析,而不是对某个特定议题的简单阐述。作者的思维路径如同迷宫般曲折,他似乎总是在绕过显而易见的答案,去挖掘那些隐藏在字里行间的潜台词。这种写作风格,对于习惯了直接了当的现代读者来说,可能需要一定的适应期。我尤其欣赏作者在处理那些历史遗留问题时所展现出的那种近乎冷酷的客观性——他仿佛站在一个绝对高处,冷眼旁观着世人对同一概念的不同解读和争论。这种旁观者的视角,使得全书充满了一种疏离的、超然的美感。它没有试图去讨好任何一方,更没有提供廉价的慰藉,相反,它要求读者投入全部的心智资源去参与这场智力上的角力。对于那些热衷于学术辩论,渴望深入理解文本背后权力运作机制的读者来说,这无疑是一份厚礼,它揭示了看似坚不可摧的知识体系是如何一步步构建,又如何在细微的注释中暴露其自身的脆弱性。
评分这部作品最迷人的地方,在于它对“注释”和“边注”的精妙运用,这本身就构成了一种独特的叙事结构。作者似乎在用这种方式告诉我们,真正的思想往往诞生于主体论述的边缘地带,那些被略去不计的“脚注”里,可能藏着颠覆一切的关键。阅读过程中,我仿佛被卷入了一场关于文本权威性的内部革命。作者对前代评论家的引述和反驳,那种看似礼貌实则犀利的交锋,展现了一种极高的知识傲骨。这不是简单的学派之争,而是一场关于“如何阅读”和“如何思考”的本体论探讨。书中的论证逻辑严密到令人窒息,每一个推导都建立在极其坚实的地基之上,使得任何试图轻易反驳的尝试都显得苍白无力。它就像一座用思想的砖石砌成的堡垒,需要你从各个角度去寻找那可能存在的、极小的裂缝,而发现的过程本身,就是对智力最大的犒赏。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有