This versatile casebook, written by authors who are at the forefront of torts scholarship, presents contemporary tort law in a clear and systematic framework. Now in its second edition, Tort Law: Responsibilities and Redress , has been refined based on classroom feedback to make it even more user-friendly and informative to students and professors alike. Among the distinctive characteristics of this unique casebook: Tort law is presented as a coherent whole. Students leave the course with a clear sense of what tort law is and what it does, and how it differs from other bodies of law, such as contracts or criminal law. Painstaking case selection ensures that students will be exposed to memorable opinions that effectively convey the substance of tort doctrine while also enabling the professor to explore from any given intellectual or political perspective underlying issues of policy, process, and theory. Current and classic cases expose students to a diverse array of case law, including decisions from jurisdictions around the country and from trial courts as well as state and federal appellate courts. Modular design of chapters permits the professor to proceed from any of several different starting points, including intentional torts, negligence, or a big-picture overview of the field. Ample explanatory text is provided , particularly in chapters that are likely to be covered early in the course. Additional materials —three appendices and two “modules”— are provided to permit professors who teach 5- or 6-hour courses to cover issues of history, policy, and theory. Substantial expository text offers unparalleled guidance in clarifying key torts concepts such as duty, breach, proximate cause, and intent. The Teacher’s Manual sets the standard for giving professors everything they need to succeed in the classroom. The meticulous revision of this casebook includes: Revised Chapter 2 , The Duty Element , makes the material more accessible to students and enables teachers to proceed more quickly through the duty component of negligence, should they wish to spend more time on other negligence topics or other torts. New cases are more straightforward and more modern than those they have replaced.. Revised Chapter 5 , Proximate Cause and Palsgraf , presents with even greater clarity than the first edition, the topics within negligence law that are most prone to generate student confusion. Revised Chapter 9 , Battery, Assault, and False Imprisonment , contains a new initial sequence of cases and notes carefully designed to support courses that begin with intentional torts. New website that includes ”retired” cases from the First Edition, practice questions, and other materials of interest. Tort Law: Responsibilities and Redress, Second Edition , offers a contemporary approach to teaching torts without sacrificing attention to the conceptual underpinnings necessary to an in-depth understanding of tort law’s operation in the modern legal system. An author website to support classroom instruction using this title is available at http://www.aspenlawschool.com/goldberg2
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的结构设计非常精妙,它不是按照传统侵权法那样线性地铺陈“过失”、“故意”和“严格责任”,反而像一个精巧的钟表,将各个部分以一种出乎意料的方式组合在一起,形成一个动态的、相互影响的系统。我特别欣赏作者在论述“损害赔偿”时所采取的非传统视角。它没有停留在计算经济损失的层面,而是深入挖掘了非物质损害(如精神痛苦、生活质量下降)在现代社会司法实践中的权重变化。书中有一段描述,关于一家小企业主因竞争对手的不正当商业行为而导致的“机会成本损失”,作者用极其细腻的笔触描绘了那种“眼睁睁看着奋斗成果化为泡影”的无助感,这远比单纯的数字更有说服力。这本书的厉害之处在于,它成功地将冰冷的法条温度,用富有同理心的文字重新加热,让读者明白,每一个判决背后,都是真实人生的巨大转折。读完后,我对“修复性正义”的理解都有了质的飞跃,它不再是一个空泛的口号,而是一种需要精心设计的司法干预。
评分老实说,这本书的阅读体验,完全不像是在啃一本法律专业书籍,更像是在参与一场高智商的辩论赛。作者的论证风格极其犀利和挑衅,他毫不留情地挑战了社会对“合理注意义务”的固有认知。比如,书中关于新兴科技领域,特别是人工智能在自动驾驶事故中责任归属的探讨,简直是超前的。他没有给出确定的答案,而是设置了一系列几乎无法解决的“电车难题”的变体,迫使读者去权衡算法设计者的责任边界与用户对系统的信任程度。这种开放性的探讨,极大地激发了我的批判性思维,让我意识到,法律的发展速度,永远落后于科技的指数级进步,而这本书正好填补了这中间的思维空白。它对于概念的解构和重建能力令人印象深刻,读起来需要全神贯注,但回报绝对是丰厚的。这本书无疑是为那些不满足于“标准答案”的思考者准备的“精神食粮”。
评分这本书的语言风格非常古典而严谨,但其内核却充满了对现代社会弊病的深刻批判。它有一种独特的“古典学者的忧思”,体现在对“罗马法精神”与“盎格鲁-撒克逊实用主义”之间张力的处理上。它似乎在温柔地引导读者,去重建一个更具人文关怀的侵权法框架。作者在比较不同法系的赔偿标准时,用的不是冰冷的表格对比,而是通过历史人物的命运沉浮来烘托不同法律体系对个体尊严的不同侧重。这种叙事手法非常高明,它让原本晦涩的比较法知识变得鲜活且充满情感。对我个人而言,最大的收获是理解了“不作为的责任”,即在某些特定关系中,未能伸出援手本身就是一种侵权行为。这本书没有提供廉价的解决方案,它提供的更像是工具箱,里面装满了精密的思维工具,让你自己去面对这个日益复杂的侵权世界。阅读它,是一种智力上的享受,也是一次深刻的自我教育。
评分如果非要用一个词来形容这本书给我的感受,那一定是“触目惊心”。它没有用耸人听闻的语言,但它所揭示的那些隐藏在日常表象之下的、关于权利与界限的模糊地带,却让人不寒而栗。作者在处理“邻里纠纷”或“职业疏忽”这类看似微小事件时,其透视力如同X光一般,直达社会结构性的不平等。我尤为欣赏书中对“举证责任倒置”在特定情境下所引发的权力失衡的分析。它不仅仅是在解释规则,更是在剖析规则背后的权力运作逻辑。阅读过程中,我多次停下来,反思自己生活中那些未曾察觉的“小侵权行为”,思考自己是如何在无意中侵犯了他人的合法权益,或者在遭受不公时,如何因为规则的不对称而处于劣势。这本书的深度在于,它成功地将枯燥的法律逻辑,转化成了一套关于日常社会生存的“道德导航系统”。
评分哇,这本书简直是法学殿堂里的一颗璀璨明珠,但它绝对不是那种一本正经、让你昏昏欲睡的教科书。我得说,作者的叙事功力一流,仿佛置身于一个充满法律灰色地带的迷宫中,每一步都充满了未知的挑战与惊喜。它没有直接聚焦于那些枯燥的案例分析和条文的堆砌,而是通过一系列引人入胜的虚构场景,巧妙地将“侵权责任”的核心精神渗透到读者的思维深处。比如,书中对“可预见性”的探讨,不是简单地引用判例,而是构建了一个极为复杂的伦理困境,让读者去思考,在信息不对称的情况下,一个理性人究竟应该承担多大的预见义务。文字的张力十足,那种对社会正义的追问,贯穿始终,使得阅读过程更像是一场思想的角力,而不是简单的知识吸收。对于初涉法律领域的新手来说,它提供了一个极佳的、充满画面感的入口;而对于资深人士,它提供的却是那些被主流教科书刻意淡化的、关于司法哲学层面的深刻反思。我强烈推荐给所有对“我们为何需要法律来规范人与人之间的伤害”这个问题感兴趣的人。
评分虽然不是他教但是仍然为Zipursky打call
评分虽然不是他教但是仍然为Zipursky打call
评分虽然不是他教但是仍然为Zipursky打call
评分虽然不是他教但是仍然为Zipursky打call
评分虽然不是他教但是仍然为Zipursky打call
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有