In total passenger miles, air travel has never been more popular. But as any frequent flyer knows, air travel problems are growing even faster - long lines, lost luggage, overbooking, flight delays, and serious safety issues. And instead of doing something about it, the traveling public seems simply to be sitting down, buckling in, and allowing itself to be treated like sheep.But it doesn't have to be this way. There are solutions to our air travel problems, real solutions that can make real differences. And they don't require 15 years to implement.With decades of experience in civil aviation and policy, Drs. George Donohue and Russell Shaver are well qualified to assess the problems in the system and offer responsible, workable solutions. Dr. Donohue, the current Director of the Center for Air Transportation Systems Research and a Professor of Systems Engineering at George Mason University (GMU), has extensive high-level experience at the Federal Aviation Administration and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Dr. Shaver, formerly a senior RAND Corporation research analyst and now a visiting research fellow at GMU, served as chief scientist for policy analysis at the MITRE Center for Advanced Aviation System Development.The stories they tell are compelling. There are high-profile horror stories - passengers stranded for hours on the tarmac, flights cancelled for 'bad weather' when there's not a drop of rain anywhere near the flight path - as well as an overall sense of apathy and obstructionism among those responsible for managing the industry. Interestingly, these problems are not the inevitable result of the size or complexity of the U.S. system. Air transportation in Europe, with almost identical air traffic control systems and safety standards, is far better.Amsterdam moves 30 per cent more passengers than Newark, but the average flight delay is an order of magnitude lower. In addition, a European Passenger's Bill of Rights - giving distressed passengers the right to substantial and immediate compensation - has been a powerful incentive for non-U.S. airlines to maintain their schedules.So just how did we get where we are in the U.S. system today? Donohue and Shaver cite multiple reasons that have combined to create the chaos we now face. These causes include airline deregulation, multiple governmental agencies with no central oversight or responsibility, multiple corporate entities with conflicting agendas, and a technologically outdated air traffic control system. Even more importantly, there seems to be a complete absence of advocacy for the customer - the passengers. The authors also explain that our air travel problems, if left unaddressed, are on a direct course to greatly impact the overall U.S. economy and harm our global competitiveness. In 2006 alone, delays and cancellations cost U.S. travelers an estimated $3.2 billion. And in 2004 and 2005, the U.S. tourism industry is estimated to have lost $98 billion in revenue due to our air travel mess.Fortunately, Donohue and Shaver don't leave us in this state of chaos. Their provocative analysis not only identifies the causes and extent of the problems, but also provides us with a course heading to put us on the path to recovery. The solutions they propose include holding the government decision-makers responsible, expanding the capacity of airports and airplanes, modernizing the air traffic control system, and implementing what the authors call the '30 per cent solution' to significantly reduce congestion.In short, this book should be read by every airline passenger traveling in or through the United States. As a country, we simply can't afford to let the chaos continue.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的配乐——如果我能这么称呼的话——是一种令人不安的和谐。它的语言风格极其古怪,充满了那种十九世纪末期神秘主义者才会使用的词汇,夹杂着一些我从未在文学作品中见过的技术术语,这些术语或许是作者自己杜撰的,但它们在上下文中的作用却无比清晰。我感觉自己像是在听一场用一种古老乐器演奏的现代电子乐,音色是陌生的,但韵律感却又莫名地吸引人。尤其在描述那些位于“边界地带”的场景时,作者的用词变得极其感官化,你仿佛能闻到空气中硫磺和旧书页混合的味道,能感觉到皮肤上细微的电流颤动。这种对感官的过度刺激,使得这本书更像是一种沉浸式的体验,而不是简单的阅读。它成功地营造了一种强烈的“异化感”,让我对日常生活中习以为常的现实规则产生了深刻的怀疑。我甚至开始留意窗外的云朵形状,试图从中寻找作者在书中暗示的某种深层结构。这是一次彻底的智力冒险,但冒险的地图是手绘的,而且很多地方的标记都用的是古怪的符号。
评分说实话,这本书的文学野心之大,让人望而生畏。它不像是一部完成的作品,更像是一个正在进行中的、庞大且失控的艺术项目。它涉及了太多的哲学流派和晦涩的科学理论,感觉作者为了表达一个核心观点,不惜将整个知识体系都倾倒在了纸面上。我必须承认,我跳过了好几页关于“非欧几里得时间序列分析”的讨论,因为那超出了我现有的知识储备,但这似乎并没有完全妨碍我对主线剧情的理解——或许,理解主线剧情本身就不是作者的目的。这本书的真正价值可能在于它抛出的问题,而不是它提供的答案。它不断地诘问读者:你所认为的“真实”是由什么构成的?你的感官是否可靠?你对秩序的追求,是否只是对混乱的一种恐惧的投射?这些问题以一种近乎粗暴的方式在你面前展开,没有温和的引导,没有循序渐进的铺垫。对于那些寻求安慰或简单娱乐的读者来说,这本书无疑会是一场灾难;但对于那些渴望被挑战,被推到认知边缘的人来说,它简直是无价的宝藏。
评分阅读过程极其孤独,这可能是我读过的最“冷”的一本书。书中的人物关系如同冰冷的机械齿轮般运转,充满了功能性,缺乏传统意义上的温暖和共鸣。我没有为任何角色感到悲伤或快乐,更多的是一种旁观者对某种复杂系统的观察。作者对情感的描绘非常克制,几乎是手术刀式的精确,但这反而凸显了那种弥漫在整个文本中的疏离感。它成功地描绘了一种极致的、技术性的存在状态,在那里,逻辑和概率取代了爱与恨。我特别喜欢那种夹杂在叙事中的“技术日志”片段,它们看起来像是从某个失落的数据库中恢复出来的文件,用最枯燥的语言描述着最惊悚的事件。这种并置产生了奇特的张力——当冰冷的记录面对着可能是宇宙终结的灾难时,那种“无动于衷”比任何歇斯底里的描写都更具震撼力。这本书要求读者完全进入一种理性的、甚至有些反人性的视角去审视一切,它像一面镜子,映照出我们内心深处对“意义”的焦虑,同时又冷漠地告诉我们,也许意义本身就是一个统计学上的错误。
评分这本书给我的感觉就像是误入了一个迷宫,但这个迷宫的墙壁是用最尖锐的哲学和最狂野的想象力砌成的。我花了很长时间才弄明白作者到底想说什么,坦白地说,我可能至今也没完全理解。它不是那种让你看完能立刻合上书本然后带着一个清晰的结论走开的作品。恰恰相反,它在你脑海里播下了一堆种子,有些是关于时间悖论的,有些是关于一个不存在的文明如何通过音乐来控制量子场。阅读过程就像是在攀登一座湿滑的花岗岩山峰,你时不时地会滑落,但每一次跌倒都让你离顶峰更近了一点点,即使那个“顶峰”可能只是一个幻觉。文字的密度令人咋舌,句子结构复杂到需要我反复回读才能捕捉到其中的微妙转折,尤其是在描绘那些跨越维度的场景时,作者似乎毫不费力地将高维几何与人类最原始的情感纠缠在一起。我必须承认,这本书挑战了我的阅读习惯,它要求你完全放下对传统叙事的依赖,去迎接一种近乎巴洛克式的、过度饱和的、同时又极度精确的表达方式。它更像是一份经过加密的编码手册,而不是一本小说,读完后我感觉自己的认知边界被拓宽了,但也留下了一种挥之不去的、关于“我到底读了什么”的迷茫感。
评分我不得不说,这本书的节奏掌控简直是个谜团。有时,它会像一场突如其来的暴风雪,信息量和情感冲击在极短的篇幅内倾泻而下,让我喘不过气来,需要放下书本冷静几分钟才能重新投入。而在另一些时候,叙事又会慢到令人发指的地步,仿佛时间本身被拉伸成了无限长,每一个动作、每一次呼吸、甚至每一个微小的环境光影变化都被细致入微地解剖。这种极端的对比,使得阅读体验充满了不确定性。我一度怀疑是不是我的阅读状态出了问题,直到我注意到作者似乎故意为之——他似乎在用叙事节奏本身来模仿某种不稳定的物理现象。最让我印象深刻的是对“记忆的侵蚀”那几章的处理,那些段落里充满了省略号和断裂的对话,你感觉自己正在亲身经历一个角色心智崩溃的过程,那种破碎感是如此真实,以至于我开始怀疑我自己的记忆是不是也出现了类似的漏洞。这本书对读者的耐心是个极大的考验,但如果你能坚持下来,你会发现这种故意制造的“断裂”和“停滞”恰恰是构建其宏大主题的关键支柱。它不是在讲故事,它是在模拟一种存在状态。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有