The European Union seems incapable of undertaking economic reforms and defining its place in the world. Public apathy towards the EU is also increasing, as citizens feel isolated from the institutions in Brussels and see no way to influence European level decisions.
Taking a diagnosis and cure approach to the EU's difficulties, Simon Hix tackles these problems with distinct clarity and open-mindedness. What the EU needs, Hix contends, is more open political competition. This would promote policy innovation, foster coalitions across the institutions, provide incentives for the media to cover developments in Brussels, and enable citizens to identify who governs in the EU and to take sides in policy debates. The EU is ready for this new challenge. The institutional reforms since the 1980s have transformed the EU into a more competitive polity, and political battles and coalitions are developing inside and between the European Parliament, the Council, and the Commission.
This emerging politics should be more central to the Brussels policy process, with clearer coalitions and identifiable winners and losers, at least in the short term. The risks are low because the EU has multiple checks-and-balances. Yet, the potential benefits are high, as more open politics could enable the EU to overcome policy gridlock, rebuild public support, and reduce the democratic deficit. This indispensable book will be of great interest to students of the European politics, scholars, policy makers and anyone concerned with the future of the European Union.
Table of Contents
List of Abbreviations.
Preface.
1. Introduction.
2. Why the European Union is More Necessary than Ever.
PART I: THE DIAGNOSIS.
3. Policy Gridlock.
4. Lack of Popular Legitimacy.
5. A Democratic Deficit.
PART II: THE CURE.
6. The Case for `Limited Democratic Politics' in the EU.
7. How the EU is Ready for Limited Democratic Politics.
8. Encouraging Democratic Politics in the EU.
9. A Scenario: The 2009 European Commission President Contest.
10. Conclusion and Response to Potential Critiques.
References
Reviews
"An exciting, rigorous and compelling book. The fix of Hix makes much more sense than the Panglossians who want to do nothing or others who argue that all the EU's problems will be resolved with better PR and more procedural reforms."
International Affairs
"Hix's research makes a convincing case that left-right divisions have deeply penetrated policymaking in the parliament, the council and the commission. Missing is a contest for political power and policymaking between rival groups and policies, with clear winners and losers and a visible link between voting, leadership and outcome."
Irish Times
"[A] short and highly readable book, which began life as a series of policy papers written for the UK government."
Ethics and International Affairs
"Simon Hix's analysis is as authoritative as his case for reform is compelling. Reasoned, rigorous and riveting, this book is a must-read for all who care about the future of the European Union."
Sir Stephen Wall
"An exceptionally clear and provocative argument in favour of 'limited democratic politics' in the EU, showing precisely how it could be applied to the 2009 European elections."
Michael Shackleton, Secretariat of the European Parliament
"Simon Hix is among the leading political analysts of the European Union of his generation. Here he offers a critical yet balanced analysis of Europe's 'democratic deficit', linked to pragmatic proposals for reform. Whether one agrees or not, this slim and readable volume is required reading for anyone seriously concerned about the constitutional future and political legitimacy of Europe."
Andrew Moravcsik, Princeton University
Simon Hix, Professor of European and Comparative Politics
Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science
评分
评分
评分
评分
合上书本后,我发现自己对“欧洲一体化”这个概念的理解发生了根本性的转变。以前,它在我心中可能是一个宏大、略显抽象的政治工程,充满了理想主义的光辉。但读完这本书,我仿佛被带入了各个决策会议室的幕后,看到了那些在利益冲突中挣扎的政治家,听到了那些基于恐惧和短视做出的妥协。它将一个宏大的叙事,成功地拆解成了无数个具体的人为选择和结构性约束的集合。这种“去神圣化”的过程,虽然可能让一些理想主义者感到失落,但对我来说,却是一种极大的启示。它让我明白,解决任何复杂问题,首先必须接受其复杂性和非完美性。这本书并非提供了廉价的灵丹妙药,相反,它更像是一份极其详尽的病理报告,指出了病灶的深度和广度,这本身就是迈向有效治理的第一步,也是最困难的一步。我甚至开始思考,这种对现有体制的深刻理解,是否可以被借鉴到理解其他大型组织或联盟的治理难题中去。
评分初读几章,我立刻察觉到作者在叙事逻辑上的那种近乎苛刻的严密性。他似乎拥有将极其复杂的宏观经济模型和碎片化的政治决策过程,通过一条清晰、几乎是线性的逻辑链条串联起来的魔力。完全没有那种欧洲问题研究中常见的,一会儿跳到布鲁塞尔的官僚体系,一会儿又拉到希腊债务危机的泥潭中打转的混乱感。相反,每一步论证都像是精密的齿轮咬合,前因后果,环环相扣,让人不得不佩服其构建理论框架的能力。我特别欣赏他引用历史先例时那种信手拈来的从容,仿佛他不是在“引用”,而是在讲述一个早已内化于心的故事。这种深厚的学术功底,使得即便是对于我这样对欧盟历史略有涉猎的读者来说,也常常有茅塞顿开之感。他对待数据和文献的态度,也体现了一种近乎偏执的求真精神,绝不满足于表面现象,而是要深挖到底层的结构性病灶,这种深度剖析的写作方式,极大地提升了阅读的智力回报率。
评分这本书的语言风格,用“犀利而不失风度”来形容最为恰当不过。它不像某些评论家那样,将批判写成了情绪化的口水战,也不是那种晦涩难懂、只有专业人士才能企及的学术黑话。作者的文字充满了力量感,他敢于直面那些被主流媒体刻意回避的敏感话题,用一种近乎手术刀般精准的措辞,解剖那些盘根错节的体制弊端。但这种批判性,却始终保持着一种绅士风度,没有沦为无端的谩骂或阴谋论的渲染。读到某些段落时,我甚至会忍不住拍案叫绝,不是因为观点有多么出乎意料,而是因为他能够用如此简洁、优雅的方式,将一个复杂的、积重难返的困境,描绘得入木三分。这种文笔上的张力和思想上的深度完美结合,使得整本书读起来酣畅淋漓,简直像是在进行一场高强度的思维体操训练,让人欲罢不能,恨不得一口气读完,领略其全部的论断。
评分这本书的封面设计简直是视觉上的盛宴,那种深邃的藏蓝色调,配上烫金的标题,立刻就给人一种沉甸甸的、严肃的学术研究的既视感。我是在一家老式的独立书店里偶然发现它的,当时是被它散发出的那种“必读”的气场所吸引。内页的装帧也相当考究,纸张的质感温润,印刷的字体清晰有力,排版疏密得当,即便是面对如此厚重的篇幅,阅读起来也不会感到压迫。作者似乎在每一个细节上都倾注了心血,这绝不是那种粗制滥造、只为蹭热点的快餐读物。我甚至花了好几分钟端详了扉页上的那段拉丁文引言,那种对古典智慧的致敬,一下子就将我的期待值拉高到了一个非同寻常的境界。光是这份对“物件本身”的尊重,就让我觉得购买是绝对值得的,它不仅仅是一本书,更像是一件值得收藏的艺术品,放在书架上,都能感受到一种无声的力量在散发。这种对细节的极致追求,往往预示着内容本身也绝非等闲之辈,让人忍不住想立刻翻开,探索隐藏在精美外壳之下的核心思想。
评分这本书最让我感到震撼的,是它在处理不同利益集团之间的张力时所展现出的那种惊人的平衡感。它没有简单地将矛头指向某个特定的国家或某个特定的政策制定者,而是将欧盟的困境视为一个系统性的、多维度相互作用的结果。当讨论到财政纪律时,它不会忽略成员国在主权让渡上的犹豫不决;当批评官僚主义的低效时,它也会同时阐释这种冗余机制在维护多元文化平衡上的“必要之恶”。这种多角度的审视,使得全书的论述充满了立体感,完全避免了非黑即白的简单化倾向。我感觉作者像是站在一个极高、极远的位置,俯瞰着整个欧洲大陆的政治生态,以一种近乎历史学家的超然视角,进行着冷静的诊断。这种成熟的处理方式,远超出了普通政治评论所能企及的范畴,它提供了一种看待欧洲未来走向的更具韧性、更少偏见的框架。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有