New England blossomed in the nineteenth century, producing a crop of distinctively American writers along with distinguished philosophers and jurists, abolitionists and scholars. A few of the female stars of this era-Emily Dickinson, Margaret Fuller, and Susan B. Anthony, for instance-are still appreciated, but there are a number of intellectual women whose crucial roles in the philosophical, social, and scientific debates that roiled the era have not been fully examined.
Among them is the astronomer Maria Mitchell. She was raised in isolated but cosmopolitan Nantucket, a place brimming with enthusiasm for intellectual culture and hosting the luminaries of the day, from Ralph Waldo Emerson to Sojourner Truth. Like many island girls, she was encouraged to study the stars. Given the relative dearth of women scientists today, most of us assume that science has always been a masculine domain. But as Renée Bergland reminds us, science and humanities were not seen as separate spheres in the nineteenth century; indeed, before the Civil War, women flourished in science and mathematics, disciplines that were considered less politically threatening and less profitable than the humanities. Mitchell apprenticed with her father, an amateur astronomer; taught herself the higher math of the day; and for years regularly "swept" the clear Nantucket night sky with the telescope in her rooftop observatory.
In 1847, thanks to these diligent sweeps, Mitchell discovered a comet and was catapulted to international fame. Within a few years she was one of America's first professional astronomers; as "computer of Venus"-a sort of human calculator-for the U.S. Navy's Nautical Almanac, she calculated the planet's changing position. After an intellectual tour of Europe that included a winter in Rome with Sophia and Nathaniel Hawthorne, Mitchell was invited to join the founding faculty at Vassar College, where she spent her later years mentoring the next generation of women astronomers. Tragically, opportunities for her students dried up over the next few decades as the increasingly male scientific establishment began to close ranks.
Mitchell protested this cultural shift in vain. "The woman who has peculiar gifts has a definite line marked out for her," she wrote, "and the call from God to do his work in the field of scientific investigation may be as imperative as that which calls the missionary into the moral field or the mother into the family . . . The question whether women have the capacity for original investigation in science is simply idle until equal opportunity is given them." In this compulsively readable biography, Renée Bergland chronicles the ideological, academic, and economic changes that led to the original sexing of science-now so familiar that most of us have never known it any other way.
评分
评分
评分
评分
当我的目光掠过《Maria Mitchell and the Sexing of Science》这个书名时,一股强烈的学术探究的冲动油然而生。这个书名,与其说是一个简单的书名,不如说是一道引人深思的命题。我预感,这本书将带领我深入到一个鲜为人知的科学史领域,去探寻Maria Mitchell这位科学家的不凡经历。我猜想,作者很可能不仅仅满足于介绍她的科学发现,而是会着重刻画她如何在那个充满性别壁垒的时代,凭借非凡的才智和毅力,在科学界开辟出属于自己的一片天地。而“Sexing of Science”这个词组,则为本书增添了更加深刻的维度。它让我思考,科学知识本身是否也曾被赋予了性别色彩,或者说,科学理论的构建过程中,是否存在着某种“性别偏见”?这是一种令人兴奋的视角,它挑战了我们对科学的传统认知,促使我们去审视科学话语背后可能存在的社会性影响。我期待这本书能提供一个独特而有力的视角,去理解科学发展过程中的性别议题。
评分读到《Maria Mitchell and the Sexing of Science》这个名字,我首先想到的是,这会不会是一本关于女性在科学探索中被边缘化或被误读的历史?Maria Mitchell这个名字,我虽然有所耳闻,但对其具体贡献和所处的时代背景并不十分了解,所以这个书名立刻激起了我探索的欲望。我猜想,作者很可能在书中详细阐述了Maria Mitchell这位女性科学家如何突破当时社会对女性角色的限制,投身于科学研究,并取得了令人瞩目的成就。而“Sexing of Science”这个部分,则让我认为,作者不仅仅停留在讲述一个人的故事,而是更进一步地去分析科学研究本身是否曾受到性别观念的影响,或者说,是否存在一种“男性视角”主导了科学的发展轨迹?这是否意味着,科学知识的生产和传播,并非如我们所想象的那般纯粹客观,而是同样受到社会文化和性别权力关系的影响?我非常期待,这本书能够为我提供一些颠覆性的见解,让我重新审视科学史,并认识到性别议题在科学发展中所扮演的重要角色。
评分这本书的书名本身就带着一种引人入胜的神秘感,"Maria Mitchell and the Sexing of Science"。初次读到这个名字,脑海中便浮现出许多疑问:Maria Mitchell究竟是何许人也?她与科学有着怎样的联系?而“sexing”这个词,又暗示了怎样的冲突或视角?是关于性别在科学研究中的地位,还是对科学理论本身的性别解读?这本书会不会探讨历史上女性科学家所面临的性别歧视,以及她们如何在这种环境中坚持自己的研究,甚至改变科学的进程?我猜测,作者可能在书中深入挖掘了Maria Mitchell这位女性科学家的故事,通过她的个人经历,来折射出科学界在特定历史时期对于性别的态度和认知。或许,书中会涉及当时社会对女性参与科学的态度,以及女性科学家是如何在重重阻碍下,证明自己的才华和价值的。我尤其好奇,“sexing”这个词,是否意味着作者试图解构科学研究中存在的性别偏见,或者揭示科学知识本身可能存在的性别建构性。这本书无疑提供了一个独特的切入点,让我能够以一种全新的视角去审视科学史,去理解那些被历史尘埃掩盖的女性智慧和贡献。
评分这本《Maria Mitchell and the Sexing of Science》的书名,在我的脑海中激起了一种强烈的求知欲。我预感这本书不仅仅是关于一位名叫Maria Mitchell的科学家的传记,它更像是一把钥匙,将我引向一个关于科学、性别与社会力量之间复杂交织的深邃领域。我想象着,作者必定花费了大量的心血,去考证Maria Mitchell的生平事迹,去还原她所处的时代背景,以及那个时代对于女性在科学领域扮演角色的固有观念。我猜测,书中很可能通过Richly detailed的叙述,展现Maria Mitchell如何克服重重障碍,在天文学或其他科学领域取得非凡成就。而“Sexing of Science”这个词组,则让我联想到,作者或许在探讨科学知识本身是否也曾受到性别视角的影响,或者说,科学的“客观性”在多大程度上受到了当时社会性别规范的塑造。这是一种非常令人振奋的思考方式,它挑战了我们对科学“中立性”的传统认知,促使我们去思考科学话语背后隐藏的权力结构。我期待着,这本书能够为我揭示一段被忽视的历史,并让我对科学的本质有更深刻的理解。
评分《Maria Mitchell and the Sexing of Science》这个书名,像一个精心设计的谜语,立刻抓住了我的注意力。它不仅仅是关于一个名字,更像是开启了一个关于科学、性别以及历史交汇点的宏大叙事。我猜想,作者并非简单地罗列Maria Mitchell的科学成就,而是试图在她的人生轨迹中,挖掘出更深层的社会文化含义。特别是“Sexing of Science”这个概念,它让我联想到,这本书可能会深入探讨在科学发展的历史进程中,性别因素是如何被构建、被理解,甚至是被利用的。这可能意味着,书中会揭示科学研究的某些方面,是如何受到当时社会性别规范的制约,或者反之,是如何被女性科学家所挑战和重塑的。我非常好奇,作者将如何通过Maria Mitchell的故事,来呈现这种复杂而微妙的互动关系。这本书,仿佛承诺了一次深入的、批判性的历史考察,让我能够看到科学的光辉背后,也可能隐藏着性别的不平等与抗争。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有