具體描述
"The thesis is radical," writes Marshall Sahlins of this landmark text inanthropology and political science. "We conventionally define the state as theregulation of violence; it may be the origin of it. Clastres's thesis is thateconomic expropriation and political coercion are inconsistent with the character oftribal society - which is to say, with the greater part of human history."Can therebe a society that is not divided into oppressors and oppressed, or that refusescoercive state apparatuses? In this beautifully written book, Pierre Clastres offersexamples of South American Indian groups that, although without hierarchicalleadership, were both affluent and complex. In so doing he refutes the usualnegative definition of tribal society and poses its order as a radical critique ofour own Western state of power.Born in 1934, Pierre Clastres was educated at theSorbonne; throughout the 1960s he lived with Indian groups in Paraguay andVenezuela. From 1971 until his death in 1979 he was Director of Studies at the fifthsection of the Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes in Paris and held the Chair ofReligion and Societies of the South American Indians there.Robert Hurley is thetranslator of the History of Sexuality by Michel Foucault and cotranslator ofAnti-Oedipus by Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari.
作者簡介
目錄資訊
讀後感
（我原计划出版这本书的中文版，但是选题被公司否决，因此发在这里，如若它对看到的人有微弱的帮助，我也就感到欣慰了。） 社会反对国家 原始社会是没有国家的社会。这一事实论断本身准确无误，而实际上隐含着一种想法，一种会立刻质疑政治人类学是否是一门严格科学的价值判断...
評分（我原计划出版这本书的中文版，但是选题被公司否决，因此发在这里，如若它对看到的人有微弱的帮助，我也就感到欣慰了。） 社会反对国家 原始社会是没有国家的社会。这一事实论断本身准确无误，而实际上隐含着一种想法，一种会立刻质疑政治人类学是否是一门严格科学的价值判断...
評分（我原计划出版这本书的中文版，但是选题被公司否决，因此发在这里，如若它对看到的人有微弱的帮助，我也就感到欣慰了。） 社会反对国家 原始社会是没有国家的社会。这一事实论断本身准确无误，而实际上隐含着一种想法，一种会立刻质疑政治人类学是否是一门严格科学的价值判断...
評分（我原计划出版这本书的中文版，但是选题被公司否决，因此发在这里，如若它对看到的人有微弱的帮助，我也就感到欣慰了。） 社会反对国家 原始社会是没有国家的社会。这一事实论断本身准确无误，而实际上隐含着一种想法，一种会立刻质疑政治人类学是否是一门严格科学的价值判断...
評分（我原计划出版这本书的中文版，但是选题被公司否决，因此发在这里，如若它对看到的人有微弱的帮助，我也就感到欣慰了。） 社会反对国家 原始社会是没有国家的社会。这一事实论断本身准确无误，而实际上隐含着一种想法，一种会立刻质疑政治人类学是否是一门严格科学的价值判断...
用戶評價
The book criticized the western political power, arguing it is only one model of state, but not the only one. The author holds against the 'common knowledge' that our modern state form is the ultimate or superior political configuration.
评分The book criticized the western political power, arguing it is only one model of state, but not the only one. The author holds against the 'common knowledge' that our modern state form is the ultimate or superior political configuration.
评分The book criticized the western political power, arguing it is only one model of state, but not the only one. The author holds against the 'common knowledge' that our modern state form is the ultimate or superior political configuration.
评分The book criticized the western political power, arguing it is only one model of state, but not the only one. The author holds against the 'common knowledge' that our modern state form is the ultimate or superior political configuration.
评分The book criticized the western political power, arguing it is only one model of state, but not the only one. The author holds against the 'common knowledge' that our modern state form is the ultimate or superior political configuration.
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有