图书标签: Shakespeare 莎学 莎士比亚 英文 文论 历史
发表于2024-11-13
Contested Will pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
For more than two hundred years after William Shakespeare's death, no one doubted that he had written his plays.Since then, however, dozens of candidates have been proposed for the authorship of what is generally agreed to be the finest body of work by a writer in the English language. In this remarkable book, Shakespeare scholar James Shapiro explains when and why so many people began to question whether Shakespeare wrote his plays. Among the doubters have been such writers and thinkers as Sigmund Freud, Henry James, Mark Twain, and Helen Keller. It is a fascinating story, replete with forgeries, deception, false claimants, ciphers and codes, conspiracy theories—and a stunning failure to grasp the power of the imagination. As Contested Will makes clear, much more than proper attribution of Shakespeare's plays is at stake in this authorship controversy. Underlying the arguments over whether Christopher Marlowe, Francis Bacon, or the Earl of Oxford wrote Shakespeare's plays are fundamental questions about literary genius, specifically about the relationship of life and art. Are the plays (and poems) of Shakespeare a sort of hidden autobiography? Do Hamlet, Macbeth, and the other great plays somehow reveal who wrote them? Shapiro is the first Shakespeare scholar to examine the authorship controversy and its history in this way, explaining what it means, why it matters, and how it has persisted despite abundant evidence that William Shakespeare of Stratford wrote the plays attributed to him. This is a brilliant historical investigation that will delight anyone interested in Shakespeare and the literary imagination.
Shapiro这本书可以看过从外往内的莎剧批评史,从莎士比亚研究的“在野党”——否认莎士比亚写了莎剧的野生专家们——的知识脉络来整理18世纪以降的现代文学批评的基本设定,莎士比亚造神史和历史主义文学批评应该如何控制自己的代入冲动。尊重历史事实距离的同时把过去作家的作品介绍给现代人永远都是个挑战,但是正如Shapiro一直指出的,假设过去的世界和现在是按照同一套基本常识运行是自大狭隘的。
评分Shapiro这本书可以看过从外往内的莎剧批评史,从莎士比亚研究的“在野党”——否认莎士比亚写了莎剧的野生专家们——的知识脉络来整理18世纪以降的现代文学批评的基本设定,莎士比亚造神史和历史主义文学批评应该如何控制自己的代入冲动。尊重历史事实距离的同时把过去作家的作品介绍给现代人永远都是个挑战,但是正如Shapiro一直指出的,假设过去的世界和现在是按照同一套基本常识运行是自大狭隘的。
评分果然我对Shakespeare无爱么。。。不过里面那个女学者Delia Bacon我倒是挺感兴趣的~
评分Shapiro这本书可以看过从外往内的莎剧批评史,从莎士比亚研究的“在野党”——否认莎士比亚写了莎剧的野生专家们——的知识脉络来整理18世纪以降的现代文学批评的基本设定,莎士比亚造神史和历史主义文学批评应该如何控制自己的代入冲动。尊重历史事实距离的同时把过去作家的作品介绍给现代人永远都是个挑战,但是正如Shapiro一直指出的,假设过去的世界和现在是按照同一套基本常识运行是自大狭隘的。
评分Shapiro这本书可以看过从外往内的莎剧批评史,从莎士比亚研究的“在野党”——否认莎士比亚写了莎剧的野生专家们——的知识脉络来整理18世纪以降的现代文学批评的基本设定,莎士比亚造神史和历史主义文学批评应该如何控制自己的代入冲动。尊重历史事实距离的同时把过去作家的作品介绍给现代人永远都是个挑战,但是正如Shapiro一直指出的,假设过去的世界和现在是按照同一套基本常识运行是自大狭隘的。
评分
评分
评分
评分
Contested Will pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024