圖書標籤: 音樂學  音樂  論文必讀   

喜歡 Music and Society 的讀者還喜歡

Mclary's "The Blasphemy of Talking Politics in Bach Year" is one of the most preposterous things i've ever read in a long time. Subsuming the hierarchical organisation of tonality under bourgeois values... what the?! Didn't most 18th c. composers worked either under the patronage of the aristocracy or the auspices of the Church?

Mclary's "The Blasphemy of Talking Politics in Bach Year" is one of the most preposterous things i've ever read in a long time. Subsuming the hierarchical organisation of tonality under bourgeois values... what the?! Didn't most 18th c. composers worked either under the patronage of the aristocracy or the auspices of the Church?

Mclary's "The Blasphemy of Talking Politics in Bach Year" is one of the most preposterous things i've ever read in a long time. Subsuming the hierarchical organisation of tonality under bourgeois values... what the?! Didn't most 18th c. composers worked either under the patronage of the aristocracy or the auspices of the Church?

Mclary's "The Blasphemy of Talking Politics in Bach Year" is one of the most preposterous things i've ever read in a long time. Subsuming the hierarchical organisation of tonality under bourgeois values... what the?! Didn't most 18th c. composers worked either under the patronage of the aristocracy or the auspices of the Church?

Mclary's "The Blasphemy of Talking Politics in Bach Year" is one of the most preposterous things i've ever read in a long time. Subsuming the hierarchical organisation of tonality under bourgeois values... what the?! Didn't most 18th c. composers worked either under the patronage of the aristocracy or the auspices of the Church?