Few historical issues have occasioned such discussion since at least the time of Marx as the transition from feudalism to capitalism in Western Europe. The Brenner Debate, which reprints from Past and Present various article in 1976, is a scholarly presentation of a variety of points of view, covering a very wide range in time, place and type of approach. Weighty theoretical responses to Brenner's first formulation followed from the late Sir Michael Postan, John Hatcher, Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie and Guy Bois; more particular contributions came from Patricia Croot, David Parker, Arnost Klima and Heide Wunder on England, France, Bohemia and Germany; and reflective pieces from R. H. Hilton and the late J. P. Cooper. Completing the volume, and giving it an overall coherence, are Brenner's own comprehensive response to those who had taken part in the debate, and also R. H. Hilton's introduction that aims to bring together the major themes in the collection of essays. The debate has already aroused widespread interest among historians and scholars in allied fields as well as among ordinary readers, and may reasonably be regarded as one of the most important historical debates of prevailing years.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
还是Brenner的论述更清晰有力。
评分十年前看过。因为要教课又翻了一下。之前竟然没发现Brenner的阶级分析用得这么灵活。
评分B站标签：万恶之源，简单翻阅，Brenner堪称正统马克思主义打不死无敌小霸王。虽非加州学派、不讨论中国资本主义问题，但界定了整个大辩论的议题：马尔萨斯陷阱（人口增长导致人均福利/生产率与经济发展停滞）是否为真，马尔萨斯到底说了什么，马克思主义理论是否能推翻马尔萨斯陷阱（尤其是生产力和生产/阶级关系，封建地主与农民关系，租值与土地所有权制度的变化）而成为比人口问题更根本的推动西欧（英国）向资本主义发展的历史动力，以及（后来在加州学派中非常重要的）斯密与马克思的政治经济理论是否能融成一个整体性的资本主义发生学理论（社会分工、市场扩展，工厂生产出现，农业主体的工业化等）。
评分十年前看过。因为要教课又翻了一下。之前竟然没发现Brenner的阶级分析用得这么灵活。
评分十年前看过。因为要教课又翻了一下。之前竟然没发现Brenner的阶级分析用得这么灵活。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有