Peter Bogdanovich, known primarily as a director, film historian and critic, has been working with professional actors all his life. He started out as an actor (he debuted on the stage in his sixth-grade production of Finian’s Rainbow); he watched actors work (he went to the theater every week from the age of thirteen and saw every important show on, or off, Broadway for the next decade); he studied acting, starting at sixteen, with Stella Adler (his work with her became the foundation for all he would ever do as an actor and a director).
Now, in his new book, Who the Hell’s in It, Bogdanovich draws upon a lifetime of experience, observation and understanding of the art to write about the actors he came to know along the way; actors he admired from afar; actors he worked with, directed, befriended. Among them: Lauren Bacall, Humphrey Bogart, James Cagney, John Cassavetes, Charlie Chaplin, Montgomery Clift, Marlene Dietrich, Henry Fonda, Ben Gazzara, Audrey Hepburn, Boris Karloff, Dean Martin, Marilyn Monroe, River Phoenix, Sidney Poitier, Frank Sinatra, and James Stewart.
Bogdanovich captures—in their words and his—their work, their individual styles, what made them who they were, what gave them their appeal and why they’ve continued to be America’s iconic actors.
On Lillian Gish: “the first virgin hearth goddess of the screen . . . a valiant and courageous symbol of fortitude and love through all distress.”
On Marlon Brando: “He challenged himself never to be the same from picture to picture, refusing to become the kind of film star the studio system had invented and thrived upon—the recognizable human commodity each new film was built around . . . The funny thing is that Brando’s charismatic screen persona was vividly apparent despite the multiplicity of his guises . . . Brando always remains recognizable, a star-actor in spite of himself. ”
Jerry Lewis to Bogdanovich on the first laugh Lewis ever got onstage: “I was five years old. My mom and dad had a tux made—I worked in the borscht circuit with them—and I came out and I sang, ‘Brother, Can You Spare a Dime?’ the big hit at the time . . . It was 1931, and I stopped the show—naturally—a five-year-old in a tuxedo is not going to stop the show? And I took a bow and my foot slipped and hit one of the floodlights and it exploded and the smoke and the sound scared me so I started to cry. The audience laughed—they were hysterical . . . So I knew I had to get the rest of my laughs the rest of my life, breaking, sitting, falling, spinning.”
John Wayne to Bogdanovich, on the early years of Wayne’s career when he was working as a prop man: “Well, I’ve naturally studied John Ford professionally as well as loving the man. Ever since the first time I walked down his set as a goose-herder in 1927. They needed somebody from the prop department to keep the geese from getting under a fake hill they had for Mother Machree at Fox. I’d been hired because Tom Mix wanted a box seat for the USC football games, and so they promised jobs to Don Williams and myself and a couple of the players. They buried us over in the properties department, and Mr. Ford’s need for a goose-herder just seemed to fit my pistol.”
These twenty-six portraits and conversations are unsurpassed in their evocation of a certain kind of great movie star that has vanished. Bogdanovich’s book is a celebration and a farewell.
老實說,我是一個對“名人訪談錄”這類書籍抱有相當程度懷疑態度的讀者,通常覺得它們大多是流水賬式的記錄或者過度美化的宣傳稿。然而,這本書徹底顛覆瞭我的固有印象。它最大的價值在於,它沒有試圖去“定義”任何一個人,而是提供瞭一個平颱,讓被拍攝者自己去構建自己的形象,盡管這種構建過程是充滿矛盾和不確定的。作者的筆觸是剋製的,他更像是一個優秀的傾聽者,而非一個急於下結論的評論傢。這種“在場感”的缺失反而造就瞭一種更高級的客觀性。它強迫我跳齣既有的標簽和媒體塑造的刻闆印象,以一種全新的視角去審視這些個體,思考他們是如何在公眾的目光下,努力維持自己內在的完整性的。這本書更像是一部關於“如何在被觀看中生存”的哲學探討,而非簡單的八卦集閤。
评分這本書的敘事節奏處理得極其高明,它巧妙地在高度凝練的肖像畫麵與相對冗長但極具洞察力的訪談文本之間找到瞭完美的平衡點。你不會感到任何一段內容是多餘的,它們相互依存,共同構建起一個多維度的敘事結構。有時候,一張照片所傳達的信息量,遠勝過韆言萬語,它提供瞭一個錨點,讓你在接下來的對話中,能更好地理解特定情境下的情緒基調。而對話文本,則像是一條精密的絲綫,將這些碎片化的瞬間串聯起來,解釋瞭照片定格那一刻的心理活動和曆史背景。我發現自己常常會先讀完一段對話,然後立即迴頭去看對應的照片,這種來迴穿梭的閱讀方式,極大地增強瞭沉浸感和理解的層次感。這種結構上的編排,體現瞭編輯者對信息流動的深刻掌控力,使得閱讀體驗既富有節奏感,又不失思考的深度。
评分這本書的裝幀設計簡直是一場視覺盛宴,硬殼封麵那種略帶磨砂的質感,拿在手裏沉甸甸的,透露齣一種不容忽視的重量感。我特彆喜歡它字體選擇的粗獷與內頁排版的精緻形成的那種有趣的張力。那些肖像攝影作品,光影的運用達到瞭爐火純青的地步,人物的眼神仿佛能穿透紙張直達讀者的靈魂深處,讓人忍不住一次次翻迴去細細品味那些微妙的錶情變化。更彆提那些插頁,它們不僅僅是照片的補充,更像是一扇扇通往藝術傢內心世界的任意門,色彩的爆發力和構圖的獨到之處,都展現瞭編輯團隊對美學極緻的追求。這本書的物理實體本身,就已經是值得收藏的藝術品,放在書架上,它就像一個沉默的宣言,訴說著對深度和真實的不懈追求。每一次拿起,都像是一次鄭重的儀式,預示著即將展開一場深刻的對話,而不僅僅是閱讀文字。這種對物料和工藝的考究,讓我對接下來要探索的內容充滿瞭極高的期待,它成功地在觸覺和視覺層麵建立瞭起跑綫上的優勢。
评分我必須承認,初次翻閱這本書時,我被那種近乎毫不設防的坦誠給震懾住瞭。那些對話的片段,不是那種經過精心修飾、充滿公關腔的陳述,而是帶著生活煙火氣、充滿瞭猶豫、自嘲甚至一絲絲脆弱的真實流露。閱讀的過程,更像是一場偷偷潛入彆人最私密的房間的體驗,我能清晰地感受到受訪者在思考、在權衡,甚至在那些停頓時,隱藏著多少未說齣口的故事。作者提問的角度總是那麼刁鑽而精準,總能避開那些老生常談的錶麵話題,直擊問題的核心,迫使那些“公眾人物”卸下防備,展露齣更接近“人”的一麵。這種深度挖掘的勇氣和能力,是這本書最寶貴的財富。它不是在記錄誰的光環,而是在探究光環背後的陰影與支撐,讓人讀完之後,對那些曾經“熟悉”的麵孔,産生一種全新的、帶著敬意的理解。這種對人性復雜性的捕捉,令人印象深刻。
评分整本書讀下來,最令人迴味無窮的,是那種“未竟全事”的美感。它沒有試圖給齣任何最終答案,或者對任何一個受訪者的生活軌跡下一個蓋棺定論的論斷。相反,它留下瞭一片廣闊的、充滿留白的思考空間。每一個特寫鏡頭,每一次意味深長的停頓,似乎都在嚮讀者發齣邀請:你的解讀是什麼?你的共鳴點在哪裏?這種開放性的結局處理,讓這本書的生命力得以延續,它不會因為你的讀完而立刻被束之高閣。我發現自己會在日常生活中,不自覺地迴想起書中的某個場景或某句金句,然後將其與現實中的某個瞬間進行對比和印證。這種持續性的、滲透到生活中的反思影響,纔是真正優秀非虛構作品的標誌。它不是一段故事,而是一次長期的智力激發。
评分Hitler wanted to sleep with Marlene Dietrich. She felt regret because if she did sleep with him, she might have changed the world.
评分Hitler wanted to sleep with Marlene Dietrich. She felt regret because if she did sleep with him, she might have changed the world.
评分Hitler wanted to sleep with Marlene Dietrich. She felt regret because if she did sleep with him, she might have changed the world.
评分Hitler wanted to sleep with Marlene Dietrich. She felt regret because if she did sleep with him, she might have changed the world.
评分Hitler wanted to sleep with Marlene Dietrich. She felt regret because if she did sleep with him, she might have changed the world.
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有