具体描述
Amazon.com Review
Robert Eisenman, one of the most eminent researchers of early Christianity working today, has produced an exhaustive study of the historical milieu at the time of Jesus and come to the conclusion that James, rather than Peter, was heir to his teachings. Because the historical material regarding James is actually quite plentiful, a clear picture arises not only in regard to who James was, but by extension, who Jesus was also. Controversy is assured; still, given a patient reading, one will discover that Eisenman's research is meticulous, his arguments cogent, and his conclusions persuasive. This should prove to be a popular and influential book.
From Library Journal
In previous writings (most recently, The Dead Sea Scrolls Uncovered, LJ 2/1/93), Eisenman drew attention to apparent parallels between the Qumran community reflected in the scrolls and the early Jewish Christian community led by James, the brother of Jesus. In his latest work, he attempts to examine further those parallels and to rescue James from "the scrapheap of history." Eisenman believes James's role in early Christianity has been downplayed in the tradition(s) preserved in the New Testament, primarily the Gospels and Acts. Vestiges of the real James are blurred. Eisenman, therefore, chooses to place more confidence in extra-biblical writings, especially the Dead Sea Scrolls, for understanding James and his role in early Christianity.
作者简介
目录信息
读后感
用户评价
没细看，大概翻了下。学术界公认此书不靠谱。艾老以自己对耶稣兄弟雅各身份的诠释，最早跳出来叫板James Tabor那些拿伪造的雅各骨棺说事的人，也是蛮拼的。
没细看，大概翻了下。学术界公认此书不靠谱。艾老以自己对耶稣兄弟雅各身份的诠释，最早跳出来叫板James Tabor那些拿伪造的雅各骨棺说事的人，也是蛮拼的。
没细看，大概翻了下。学术界公认此书不靠谱。艾老以自己对耶稣兄弟雅各身份的诠释，最早跳出来叫板James Tabor那些拿伪造的雅各骨棺说事的人，也是蛮拼的。
没细看，大概翻了下。学术界公认此书不靠谱。艾老以自己对耶稣兄弟雅各身份的诠释，最早跳出来叫板James Tabor那些拿伪造的雅各骨棺说事的人，也是蛮拼的。
没细看，大概翻了下。学术界公认此书不靠谱。艾老以自己对耶稣兄弟雅各身份的诠释，最早跳出来叫板James Tabor那些拿伪造的雅各骨棺说事的人，也是蛮拼的。
