In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Western scientific interest in China focused primarily on natural history. Prominent scholars in Europe as well as Westerners in China, including missionaries, merchants, consular officers, and visiting plant hunters, eagerly investigated the flora and fauna of China. Yet despite the importance and extent of this scientific activity, it has been entirely neglected by historians of science.
This book is the first comprehensive study on this topic. In a series of vivid chapters, Fa-ti Fan examines the research of British naturalists in China in relation to the history of natural history, of empire, and of Sino-Western relations. The author gives a panoramic view of how the British naturalists and the Chinese explored, studied, and represented China’s natural world in the social and cultural environment of Qing China.
Using the example of British naturalists in China, the author argues for reinterpreting the history of natural history, by including neglected historical actors, intellectual traditions, and cultural practices. His approach moves beyond viewing the history of science and empire within European history and considers the exchange of ideas, aesthetic tastes, material culture, and plants and animals in local and global contexts. This compelling book provides an innovative framework for understanding the formation of scientific practice and knowledge in cultural encounters.
Fa-ti Fan is Assistant Professor of History at the State University of New York at Binghamton.
□江晓原 ■ 刘 兵 □此书首先引起我注意的,是开头提出的“科学帝国主义”(scientific imperialism)观念。作者使用这个观念,指的是“科学与帝国殖民事业两者的共生关系,说明科学发展与帝国想象的扩张,在某些情况下构成了一个相互作用的反馈回圈”。这种弯弯绕的...
評分这是具体链接: http://www.dfdaily.com/html/1170/2011/12/17/716734.shtml “博物学”(natural history)在我们目前的知识框架中居于很边缘的地位,因为在当代科学中已经没有了它的正统位置。当然,在科学史研究领域中,博物学史仍然占有重要的地位。但是,读完范发迪教授...
評分2011年11月13日上海《东方早报》文章 王洪波 提到“科学”二字,一般人首先想到的必定是物理、化学之类,“博物学”一词很难跳进脑海里。这准确反映了博物学已经衰落的现实。近年来一直有人为博物学鸣不平,刘华杰就是其中有代表性的一位。最近,由他主编的《好的归...
評分新史學十六卷三期 二○○五年九月 評介Fa-ti Fan, British Naturalists in Qing China: Science, Empire and Cultural Encounter Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2004, xi+238pp. 祝平一 中央研究院歷史語言研究所副研究員 范發迪(Fa-ti Fan)的近著探討十九世...
評分http://www.sociologyol.org/yanjiubankuai/tuijianyuedu/tuijianyueduliebiao/2011-12-03/13600.html 文化遭遇与知识网络:了解中国博物学的新路径及其限度 ——范发迪《清代在华的英国博物学家》译后赘言 袁 剑 本文发表于《读书》2011年第11期 还记得之前关于熊猫是“...
題目、論點、文字都不錯,但缺少中國這一邊的史料是硬傷,導緻很多可以深挖的“文化遭遇”隻能一筆帶過。
评分關於native agency和最後一章fieldwork 的討論很漂亮。理論的使用似乎有點過瞭?另外,學力和閱讀能力所限,我還是不太清楚,對近代中國“的”科學發展而言,對聯繫和比較英帝國科學在其他殖民地的發展經驗而言,這段英國博物學者在華的遭遇故事,是不是能提供更多的啟示?
评分it tells us exactly what its title says: no more, no less.
评分一本難得的好書
评分題目、論點、文字都不錯,但缺少中國這一邊的史料是硬傷,導緻很多可以深挖的“文化遭遇”隻能一筆帶過。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有