Take Back Our Future pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025
Ming Sing is associate professor at Hong Kong University of Science & Technology. His research interests include include comparative study of democracy and democratization, political culture, civil society, and Hong Kong politics. He has been the author or editor of five books and has published in the Journal of Politics, Journal of Democracy, Democratization, Government and Opposition, Social Indicators Research, among others. He has also been an active commentator on Hong Kong politics, whose comments have been solicited by local and international media.
Ching Kwan Lee is Professor of Sociology at the University of California-Los Angeles. She is author of The Specter of Global China.
- 香港
- 社會學
- HK
- 社會運動
- 李靜君
- UmbrellaMovement
- Sociology
In a comprehensive and theoretically novel analysis, Take Back Our Future unveils the causes, processes, and implications of the 2014 seventy-nine-day occupation movement in Hong Kong known as the Umbrella Movement. The essays presented here by a team of experts with deep local knowledge ask: how and why had a world financial center known for its free-wheeling capitalism transformed into a hotbed of mass defiance and civic disobedience?
Take Back Our Future argues that the Umbrella Movement was a response to China's internal colonization strategies—political disenfranchisement, economic subsumption, and identity reengineering—in post-handover Hong Kong. The contributors outline how this historic and transformative movement formulated new cultural categories and narratives, fueled the formation and expansion of civil society organizations and networks both for and against the regime, and spurred the regime's turn to repression and structural closure of dissent. Although the Umbrella Movement was fraught with internal tensions, Take Back Our Future demonstrates that the movement politicized a whole generation of people who had no prior experience in politics, fashioned new subjects and identities, and awakened popular consciousness.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
視角相對局限，理論比較陳舊，現象隻用事件串聯不做解釋性研究，社科人文大雜燴，因為僅用倆民意調研數據，或者對比或者相關，也撐不起行動的篇幅。所以纔要加點文化進去。解釋力度一般。JSTOR可分章下載 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctvfc54dj
评分視角相對局限，理論比較陳舊，現象隻用事件串聯不做解釋性研究，社科人文大雜燴，因為僅用倆民意調研數據，或者對比或者相關，也撐不起行動的篇幅。所以纔要加點文化進去。解釋力度一般。JSTOR可分章下載 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctvfc54dj
评分視角相對局限，理論比較陳舊，現象隻用事件串聯不做解釋性研究，社科人文大雜燴，因為僅用倆民意調研數據，或者對比或者相關，也撐不起行動的篇幅。所以纔要加點文化進去。解釋力度一般。JSTOR可分章下載 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctvfc54dj
评分視角相對局限，理論比較陳舊，現象隻用事件串聯不做解釋性研究，社科人文大雜燴，因為僅用倆民意調研數據，或者對比或者相關，也撐不起行動的篇幅。所以纔要加點文化進去。解釋力度一般。JSTOR可分章下載 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctvfc54dj
评分視角相對局限，理論比較陳舊，現象隻用事件串聯不做解釋性研究，社科人文大雜燴，因為僅用倆民意調研數據，或者對比或者相關，也撐不起行動的篇幅。所以纔要加點文化進去。解釋力度一般。JSTOR可分章下載 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctvfc54dj
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有