Everyone seems to agree that brutal dictators and despotic rulers deserve scorn and worse. But why have historians been so willing to overlook the despotic actions of the United State's own presidents? You can scour libraries from one end to the other and encounter precious few criticisms of America's worst despots.
The founders imagined that the president would be a collegial leader with precious little power who constantly faced the threat of impeachment. Today, however, the president orders thousands of young men and women to danger and death in foreign lands, rubber stamps regulations that throw enterprises into upheaval, controls the composition of the powerful Federal Reserve, and manages the priorities millions of swarms of bureaucrats that vex the citizenry in every way.
It is not too much of a stretch to say that the president embodies the Leviathan state as we know it. Or, more precisely, it is not an individual president so much as the very institution of the presidency that has been the major impediment of liberty. The presidency as the founders imagined it has been displaced by democratically ratified serial despotism. And, for that reason, it must be stopped.
Every American president seems to strive to make the historians' A-list by doing big and dramatic things—wars, occupations, massive programs, tyrannies large and small—in hopes of being considered among the "greats" such as Lincoln, Wilson, and FDR. They always imagine themselves as honored by future generations: the worse their crimes, the more the accolades.
Well, the free ride ends with Reassessing the Presidency: The Rise of the Executive State and the Decline of Freedom, edited by John Denson.
This remarkable volume (825 pages including index and bibliography) is the first full-scale revision of the official history of the U.S. executive state. It traces the progression of power exercised by American presidents from the early American Republic up to the eventual reality of the power-hungry Caesars which later appear as president in American history. Contributors examine the usual judgments of the historical profession to show the ugly side of supposed presidential greatness.
The mission inherent in this undertaking is to determine how the presidency degenerated into the office of American Caesar. Did the character of the man who held the office corrupt it, or did the power of the office, as it evolved, corrupt the man? Or was it a combination of the two? Was there too much latent power in the original creation of the office as the Anti-Federalists claimed? Or was the power externally created and added to the position by corrupt or misguided men?
There's never been a better guide to everything awful about American presidents. No, you won't get the civics text approach of see no evil. Essay after essay details depredations that will shock you, and wonder how American liberty could have ever survived in light of the rule of these people.
Contributors include George Bittlingmayer, John V. Denson, Marshall L. DeRosa, Thomas J. DiLorenzo, Lowell Gallaway, Richard M. Gamble, David Gordon, Paul Gottfried, Randall G. Holcombe, Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Jeffrey Rogers Hummel, Michael Levin, Yuri N. Maltsev, William Marina, Ralph Raico, Joseph Salerno, Barry Simpson, Joseph Stromberg, H. Arthur Scott Trask, Richard Vedder, and Clyde Wilson.
• Introduction by John V. Denson
• Rating Presidential Performance, by Richard Vedder and Lowell Gallaway
• George Washington: An Image and Its Influence, by David Gordon
• Thomas Jefferson: Classical-Liberal Statesman of the Old Republic, by H. Arthur Scott Trask
• Supreme Court as Accomplice: Judicial Backing for a Despotic Presidency, by Marshall L. DeRosa
• The Electoral College as a Restraint on American Democracy: Its Evolution from Washington to Jackson, by Randall G. Holcombe
• Martin Van Buren: The American Gladstone, by Jeffrey Rogers Hummel
• Abraham Lincoln and the Triumph of Mercantilism, by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
• Lincoln and the First Shot: A Study of Deceit and Deception, by John V. Denson
• President Andrew Johnson: Tribune of States’ Rights, by H. Arthur Scott Trask and Carey Roberts
• William McKinley: Architect of the American Empire, by Joseph R. Stromberg
• Theodore Roosevelt and the Modern Presidency, by Thomas E. Woods, Jr
• The Use and Abuse of Antitrust From Cleveland to Clinton: Causes and Consequences, by George Bittlingmayer
• From Opponent of Empire to Career Opportunist: William Howard Taft as Conservative Bureaucrat. by William Marina
• Woodrow Wilson’s Revolution Within the Form, by Richard M. Gamble
• Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal: From Economic Fascism to Pork-Barrel Politics, by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
• Roosevelt and the First Shot: A Study of Deceit and Deception, by John V. Denson
• Despotism Loves Company: The Story of Franklin D. Roosevelt and Josef Stalin. by Yuri N. Maltsev and Barry Dean Simpson
• Harry S. Truman: Advancing the Revolution, by Ralph Raico
• From Kennedy’s "New Economics" to Nixon’s "New Economic Policy": Monetary Inflation and the March of Economic Fascism, by Joseph T. Salerno
• The Managerial President, by Paul Gottfried
• The President as Social Engineer, by Michael Levin
• The Impossibility of Limited Government and the Prospects for a Second American Revolution, by Hans-Hermann Hoppe
• The American President: From Cincinnatus to Caesar, by Clyde N. Wilson
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书给我带来的最大震撼,来自于其批判性思维的深度与广度。它没有满足于对既有观点的重复叙述,而是大胆地提出了许多挑战性的假设,并用令人信服的证据链条去支撑这些假设。每一次当我觉得自己似乎已经把握了作者的立场时,下一页的内容就会带来一个意想不到的转折,迫使我重新审视自己原有的认知。这种不断推翻和重建认知结构的过程,是真正的高质量阅读体验。书中的案例选择极具代表性,它们不仅仅是孤立的事件,而是被精心挑选出来,用以串联起一个更加宏大、更具普遍性的理论框架。作者在构建这些框架时,展现出惊人的耐心和对细节的痴迷,每一个数据点的选取似乎都经过了反复的推敲,以确保其论证的强度。对于任何渴望超越表面现象,探究事物深层驱动力的读者来说,这本书无疑是一份宝贵的地图,它指引我们探索那些通常被忽略的角落,发现隐藏的规律。
评分我必须承认,这本书的阅读门槛不低,它要求读者具备一定的背景知识储备,但一旦跨越了最初的适应期,其回报将是无与伦比的丰厚。作者的文字风格偏向于学术的严谨,但穿插其中的一些精妙的比喻和对历史人物性格的精准刻画,有效地缓和了这种严肃性。书中对不同时期和不同意识形态下权力运作模式的对比分析,尤为精妙,它揭示出了一些看似截然不同实则内核相通的运作逻辑。我尤其欣赏作者那种近乎人类学的观察视角,仿佛他站在一个超然的位置,冷眼旁观着人类政治活动的循环往复。这本书不是在“讲述”历史,而是在“解释”历史的内在逻辑,这是一种更高层次的理解。它不是提供简单的答案,而是提供了一套强大的分析工具,让读者自己去应对未来的复杂性。对于那些不满足于泛泛而谈的深度思考者来说,这绝对是一剂强心针。
评分这本书的结构简直是教科书级别的范例,每一个章节的过渡都处理得极其自然流畅,仿佛作者是一位经验老到的向导,带着你穿越一片知识的迷雾。初读之下,你会被其严谨的逻辑和扎实的论据所折服。作者似乎对每一个论点都进行了地毯式的搜索和审视,确保没有任何疏漏。尤其是在处理那些历史上有争议的议题时,作者展现出了惊人的平衡感,既不偏袒任何一方,又能深入挖掘出不同视角下的细微差别。那种将复杂问题层层剥开,最终呈现出清晰脉络的能力,令人叹为观止。阅读过程中,我常常需要停下来,回味那些精妙的措辞和构建完美的论证链条。它不是那种快餐式的读物,需要你投入时间去消化,去思考,但回报是巨大的——你不仅仅是获取了信息,更是提升了自己分析问题的能力。那种阅读完之后,感觉自己的知识体系被重新校准和强化的满足感,是极少数书籍能给予的体验。作者在叙事上的克制也值得称赞,没有过多的情感渲染,全凭事实和推理来打动读者,显得无比可靠和专业。
评分坦率地说,我一开始对这类题材的书籍抱持着一种审慎的期待,毕竟市面上充斥着太多华而不实的评论。然而,这本书完全打破了我的固有印象。它最引人注目之处在于其对“权力运作机制”的深度剖析,那种对幕后交易、政治博弈的细致描摹,让人感觉仿佛置身于决策的核心圈。作者的笔触如同手术刀般精准,直指问题的关键,却又不会显得过于冷酷或教条。我特别欣赏它在引用一手资料时的审慎和恰当,那些被引用的文献和访谈录,都像是为整本书的论点添砖加瓦,而非单纯的堆砌。这本书的行文风格非常具有画面感,即便是描述枯燥的政策演变过程,也能被作者写得引人入胜,充满了戏剧张力。它成功地将宏大的历史叙事与微观的个体决策联系起来,让读者清晰地看到每一个关键选择背后所承载的重量和后果。读完之后,我对理解当代政治动态的基石有了更坚实的基础,这种“洞悉本质”的感觉非常过瘾。
评分读完这本书,我感觉自己像进行了一次彻底的思维排毒。作者的行文节奏控制得炉火纯青,既有稳扎稳打的理论铺陈,也有突然爆发的观点冲击力,张弛有度,引人入胜。它成功地将原本可能显得晦涩难懂的政治哲学与现实政治操作紧密地结合在一起,使得理论不再是空中楼阁,而是能指导我们理解日常新闻事件的实用工具。书中对“理想与现实”之间永恒张力的探讨,尤为触动人心,作者并没有给出一个简单的“好”或“坏”的裁决,而是深入剖析了这种张力是如何塑造历史进程的。这种对灰色地带的坦诚描绘,显得极其成熟和可靠。我特别欣赏它在提供结论时所展现的谦逊,作者似乎在提醒我们,即便是最精妙的分析,也只是对现实的一种暂时的、或许不完美的摹写。这使得整本书的基调充满了理性的温度,而不是冰冷的教条。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有